Title: Biological Control of Microbial Plant Pathogens
1Biological Control of Microbial Plant Pathogens
- Introduction to the Microbial World of Biological
Control - Ent 447/547, Fall 2005
- http//www.agls.uidaho.edu/ent547biocontrol/
- wchun_at_uidaho.edu
- AgBiotech 109/TLC 231
- 5-5708/5220
2Plant Disease
- Plants can become "sick" due to some infectious
agent, such as fungi, bacteria, nematodes, or
viruses. - In some instances insects and vascular plants may
be considered as plant pathogens. - These agents are capable of infecting plants
and disrupting their normal functioning,
resulting in disease. - Thus, Plant Disease is considered to be the
abnormal physiological response of a plant to the
chronic association with a primary causal agent.
3Plant Disease Expression
- Diseased can be manifested in many ways.
- Blemishes, or lesions, on the leaves, stems,
flowers, or fruit. - Reductions in growth
- Loss of color loss or abnormal growth of leaves,
flowers, or fruit. - Browning or dieback of leaves and shoots
wilting. - Death of the plant.
- Organisms that cause disease in plants generally
do not cause disease in humans or animals. - The science of studying diseases of plants, their
causes, effects, and control, is called Plant
Pathology.
4Plant Pathogens
- Bacteria
- Fungi
- Insects
- Nematodes
- Viruses
- Weeds
Stemphylium fruit spot of papaya caused by
Stemphylium lycopersici
Photograph courtesy W. T. Nishijimafrom the
Compendium of Tropical Fruit Diseases
Plant Damage destruction of plant tissue due to
a single, non-recurring event.
5Fungal Etiology of Late Blight Identified1853 -
Anton de Bary firmly established the fungal
etiology of plant disease. Describes
Phytophthora infestans as the causal agent of the
Irish Potato Famine. Went on to describe the
etiology of many other important diseases of the
time.
6Similarities and Differences (Insect, Plant,
Microbial)
- Similarities
- Employs many of the same principles of biological
control for insects and plants. - Best success with integrative use of control
agents. - Utilizes parasites.
- Utilizes conservation, augmentation, and
importation. - Differences
- Employs ecological management at the microbial
level. - Uses competitors, tricksters and parasites.
- Usually focuses more on conservation and
augmentation rather than importation.
7Challenges Facing Microbial Agents
8The Nature and Practice of Biological Control of
Plant Pathogens Baker and Cook
- Favor the Antagonist
- Adding Amendments - antagonist stimulation
- Alter pH
- Tillage - modify soil structure or aeration
- Planting date selection escape
- Apply organic amendments increase background
flora - Add antagonists
- Trick the Pathogen
- Crop Rotation - lower inoculum density
- Trap plants
- Irrigation Practices
9EPA Biopesticides
- Microbial Pesticides
- Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs)
- Biochemical Pesticides
10Microbial Pesticideshttp//www.epa.gov/pesticides
/biopesticides/
- Microbial pesticides consist of a microorganism
(e.g., a bacterium, fungus, virus or protozoan)
as the active ingredient. Microbial pesticides
can control many different kinds of pests,
although each separate active ingredient is
relatively specific for its target pests. For
example, there are fungi that control certain
weeds, and other fungi that kill specific
insects.
11Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) (EPA)
- PIPs used to be called Plant-pesticides are
pesticidal substances that plants produce from
genetic material that has been added to the
plant. For example, scientists can take the gene
for the Bt pesticidal protein, and introduce the
gene into the plants own genetic material. Then
the plant, instead of the Bt bacterium,
manufactures the substance that destroys the
pest. Both the protein and its genetic material
are regulated by EPA the plant itself is not
regulated.
12Biochemical Pesticides
- Biochemical pesticides Biochemical pesticides are
naturally occurring substances that control pests
by non-toxic mechanisms. Conventional pesticides,
by contrast, are generally synthetic materials
that directly kill or inactivate the pest.
Biochemical pesticides include substances, such
as insect sex pheromones, that interfere with
mating, as well as various scented plant extracts
that attract insect pests to traps. Because it is
sometimes difficult to determine whether a
substance meets the criteria for classification
as a biochemical pesticide, EPA has established a
special committee to make such decisions.
13Early Microbial Biological Control was Accidental
The Aztecs were a warring people who came to the
central valley of Mexico around 1200 AD from the
southwestern United States
14Aztec Microbial Biological Control
- According to legend, a special sign from the gods
would show them the site for their new
settlement. This would be an eagle with a serpent
in its mouth, perched on a large cactus. Sometime
around 1325, they saw such an eagle on an island
in the middle of a lake and settled there. This
site, where Mexico City is located today, became
the center of the Aztec world - Tenochtitlán.
15Aztec Microbial Biological Control
- By 1519, an estimated 200,000 people lived in
Tenochtitlán - Had developed an agricultural system farming
adjacent marshy but rich land - Built floating islands of dirt piled on bound
weeds, surrounded by canals, fertilized with
aquatic weeds and animal manure
http//www.xochimilco.df.gob.mx/turismo/chinampas.
html
16Aztec Microbial Biological Controlhttp//www.silv
ervizion.com/lewis/aztecs/content/foodfarm/chinamp
as.htm
17Vile Concoctions for Tree Wounds
- Nectria galligena a fungus, European Apple
Canker - Austen, 1657 - treat fresh pruning wounds with
cow dung and urine to prevent apple canker
Twig canker
18Vile Concoctions for Tree Wounds
- Forsyth, 1791 - fresh cow dung, lime, wood ashes,
and sand - Le Berryais, 1785 - fresh mud
- MacDonald et al., 1979 - soil applied to American
chestnut caused Endothia parasitica cankers to
heal - Trichoderma sp.?
19The Discovery of Antibiotics Was A Turning Point
In Biotechnology and Plant Pathology
- Roberts, W. 1874
- Penicillium broth inhibitory to bacteria
- Antibiotics, antibiosis
- Sir Alexander Fleming, 1928, penicillin
- Most of the antibiotics discovered since then are
from soil saprophytic microorganisms
20Biological Control With Microbes First Described
- Hartley, 1921
- Autoclaved soil with Pythium debaryanum nearly
100 pine seedling death - Non-sterile soil P. debaryanum 38.5
damping-off. - Added Phoma, Chaetomium, Rhizopus, Trichoderma,
Aspergillus, Rosellinia, Penicillium - 11
damping-off. - Mixed non-sterile soil and 13 microorganisms
together, 16.9 damping-off.
21Second Direct Application
- Millard and Taylor, 1927
- Common scab of potatoes, Streptomyces scabies
- Added green grass cuttings and Streptomyces
praecox in sterilized soil in pot tests - Starving out
22Still on History
- Sanford and Broadfoot, 1931 - first used
Biological Control in plant pathology - 40 bacteria, 24 fungi
- Organisms or culture filtrates in sterile soil
- Found organisms more effective against
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici
23First Demonstration of a Toxin from a BC Agent
- Weindling, 1931 to 1941
- Trichoderma viride antagonistic to soil pathogens
- Purified viridin, gliotoxin (Gliocladium virens)
- 1/300,000 dilution active against Rhizoctonia
solani
24Suppressive Soils
- Reinking and Manns, 1933
- Central America soils
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense - Panama
disease of banana - Pathogen isolated from sandy soil but not from
clay soils - Sandy soil plantings last 10 years (conducive)
- Clay soil planting last 20 years (suppressive)
25Suppressive Soils Have a Microbiological Reason
- Gerlagh, 1968
- 4 successive crops in soil increased suppression
of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici - Steaming destroys antagonists
26Biological ControlA Microbiologists Perspective
- Pest suppression with biological agents operating
in a background of integrated control that does
not depend on host resistance, sterilization of
the target pathogen, or modification of pest
behavior
27Biological Control Mechanisms
- Competition
- Antibiosis
- Parasitism
- Induced resistance
- Disease agent transfer
28Microbial Control Results inA Microbiologists
Perspective
- Destruction of the propagative units or biomass
of the pathogen - Prevention of inoculum formation
- Weakening or displacement of the pathogen in
infested residue - Reduction of vigor or virulence of the pathogen
by agents such as mycoviruses or hypovirulence
determinants - Nothing
29Agrobacterium radiobacter Galltrol-A, Nogall,
Diegall, Norbac 84C Bacillus subtilis Epic,
Kodiak , Rhizo Plus , Serenade , System_3
Burkholderia cepacia Intercept Pseudomonas
fluorescens BlightBan A506, Conquer, Victus
Pseudomonas syringae Bio-save100, Bio-save 110
Streptomyces griseoviridis Mycostop
Ampelomyces quisqualis AQ10 Candida oleophila
Aspire Coniothyrium minitans Contans , KONI
Fusarium oxysporum Biofox C, Fusaclean
Gliocladium virens SoilGard Gliocladium
catenulatum PreStop, Primastop Phlebia
gigantea Rotstop, P.g. Suspension Pythium
oligandrum Polygandron Trichoderma harzianum
and other spp. Bio_Fungus, Binab_T, RootShield,
T-22G, T-22 Planter Box, Bio-Trek), Supresivit,
Trichodex, Trichopel, Trichoject, Trichodowels,
Trichoseal , Trichoderma 2000
30Reasons Why Biological Control is not Very Popular
- Wait until something is wrong.
- Chemicals are faster and less complicated and
usually give better results. - Active grower engagement.
- Marketing
- Extension pathology.
- Decline in interest in ecology.
- Poor biological control products (haste).
31Final Points
- Finding biological control organisms
- Suppressive soils
- Old world
- Plant pathogens
- Strange and unusual places
- How do you use microorganisms as BC agents?
- Application methods
- In IPM programs