Title: Government Influence on Trade: Strategic Trade Theory
1Government Influence on Trade Strategic Trade
Theory
2Strategic Trade Theories
- Response to assumptions in comparative advantage.
- Policy Issue Should the US government
- restrict activities of foreign firms in the
domestic market? - promote the activities of domestic firms in
global markets? - Strategic Trade Policy involves government
intervention.
3Strategic Trade Policy
- Governments sometimes target select industries,
in terms of RD subsidies, import restraints or
export subsidies, etc. - Wherever they think they can succeed
- In rich nations, this often fails
- If the industry were good, private investors
would invest in it - In poor nations, there is often no alternative to
targeting a few industries - Few local investors
- Infrastructure must focus on something
4Traditional arguments for trade protection
- Traditional arguments made for protection
- National Security
- Strategic sectors, military preparedness
- Unfair competition
- Low wages, government subsidies
- Infant industry
- Temporary protection to shield new industry
- Income distribution and employment
- Allows relatively uncompetitive producers to stay
in business - Allows domestic firms to charge higher prices,
pay higher wages
5- Arguments for Strategic Trade Policy
- Increasing returns to scale, learning curves and
imperfect competition - firms can affect market structure and conduct
(preemption, predation, dumping . . .) - RD intensity, technological spillovers
- ability to appropriate rents that would accrue to
foreigners - Possibilities of market failures
- e.g.. incentives to innovate in the presence of
high risk - exit and entry barriers
6Arguments against Strategic Trade Policies and
Protection
- Possibility of retaliation
- loss of export markets
- Special interest groups
- tend to maintain protectionist policies long
after their useful life, especially as benefits
are concentrated, while costs are diffused over
the whole population - Gains from free competition may far outweigh
gains from protection - With protection, firms have no incentive to
become efficient - Further, protection is usually sought by less
efficient sectors of the economy, which leads to
inefficient resource allocation - Can Government pick winners?
- Markets better at this
- Who loses in a globally-integrated economy?
- Could it be American-owned firms?
7Types of Government Intervention
- Laissez-faire -- market forces
- Targeting industries
- Policies on intellectual property rights
- Breadth of patent
- First to file vs. invent
- Picking winners/ and planning death of losers
- Regional integration
8Rationales
- Economic Rationales Noneconomic Rationales
- Prevent unemployment Maintain essential
industries - Protect infant industries Deal with
unfriendly countries - Promote industrialization Maintain spheres of
influence - Improve position compared Preserve
national identity to other countries
9Example International Business Strategy and the
Political Legal Environment
- U.S.-Japanese Auto Trade
- When facing import competition, companies can
- Try to get protection
- Move abroad
- Seek other market niches
- Make domestic output competitive
- Approaches to the International Environment
- What kind of companies have the most to lose from
protectionism? Big or small? Diversified or not?
10Government Instruments of Trade Control
- Tariffs
- Import tariff
- Export tariff
- Transit tariff
- Specific duty
- Quotas
- Subsidies
- Aid and loans
- Customs valuation
6-9
11TRADE RESTRICTIONS BASED ON TARIFFS
12Issues With Sanctions
- Costs of sanctions on innocent people
- Inability of sanctions to induce a change in
leadership - Uneven application among countries
- Review the countrys overall record
- Lack of agreement about the cause being protested
6-11
13Conflicting Results of Policies
- Objectives may conflict
- Economic, social, and political goals of a
country often conflict - May be impossible to help some industries without
hurting others - Proposed reforms of trade regulations results in
heated debates among pressure groups
14GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tarriffs)
- Created in 1947 by 23 countries
- Intended to negotiate reductions in trade
restrictions and develop common procedures for
handling imports and exports - Efforts led to a number of multilateral
reductions in tariffs and nontariff barriers for
member countries - across-the-board reductions
- each country negotiated exceptions to its
reductions - Codes of conduct developed in each of five areas
- Inherent weakness of GATT
- Cumbersome negotiations
- Most-favored nation trade concessions applied to
all trading partners - No mechanism to assure compliance with negotiated
agreements
15WTO(WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION)
- Created in 1995 to replace GATT
- Negotiating process
- Ongoing negotiations about
- restrictions on trade in services
- nontariff barriers to trade
- protection of intellectual-property rights
- investment policies that affect trade
- Granting of normal trade relations
- Apply to WTO members
- Eliminates the free-rider complaint raised during
GATT negotiations - Certain exceptions recognized
- Settlement of disputes
- Clearly defined settlement mechanism
- Sanctions may be applied to countries that do
not comply with rulings
16Regional economic integrationWhy ?
- Despite the World Trade Organization, many tariff
and non-tariff barriers exist - People can often understand each other better
when they live close to each other
17Regional Economic Integration
- Distance goods need to travel between countries
is short - Consumers tastes are likely to be similar
- Distribution channels can be easily established
- Neighboring countries may have common history and
interests - Economic integration prevents wars
7-3
18Basic Types of Regional Economic Integration
- Free Trade Area (FTA) seeks to abolish tariffs
between member nations - Customs union eliminate internal tariffs common
external tariff on goods from outside - Common market same elements as customs union
plus free mobility of production factors such as
labor and capital - Economic integration common economic policies
- Common currency
- Political integration
7-4
19MAJOR REGIONAL TRADING GROUPS
Free Trade Areas European Free Trade
Association Central European Free Trade
Agreement North American Free Trade
Agreement Association of South East Asian
Nations
Customs Union MERCOSUR
Common Market Caribbean Community and Common
Market Central American Common Market Andean
Group
Economic Integration European Union
20Effects of Integration
- Static effects
- Shifting of resources from inefficient to
efficient companies as trade barriers fall - Dynamic effects
- Overall growth in market
- Expanded production
- Greater economies of scale
7-5
21WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE EU ON CORPORATE
STRATEGY?
-
- EU is a tremendous market
- Large, relatively prosperous population
- Likely expansion to Eastern and Central Europe
- More fragmented than U.S. market
- expansion likely to increase fragmentation
- Mergers, takeovers, and spin-offs will continue
22IMPLICATIONS OF NAFTA ON CORPORATE STRATEGY
-
- NAFTA perceived as one big regional market
- Companies can rationalize production, financing
- low-end manufacturing moving south
- sophisticated manufacturing increasing in U.S.
- Canadian and Mexican companies have not been put
out of business - Mexico perceived as a market for U.S. goods, not
just a location for low-cost production
23IMPLICATIONS OF MERCOSUR?
- MERCOSURmajor trading group in South America
- significant because of its size
- signed free trade agreements with other South
American countries - trying to become a customs union
24IMPLICATIONS OF ASIAN TRADING GROUPS?
-
- Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)
- promotes cooperation in industry and trade
- members rely more on U.S. market for exports than
on each other - created ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA)
- goal is to cut tariffs on intrazonal trade
- Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
- objectives are to
- resist protectionist pressures
- counter inward-looking regionalism
- deal with economic conflicts in the region
- size and diversity of members are problems
25PROBLEMS OF INTEGRATION
- problems if new members
- have weak economies
- have serious political problems
26Why a big US trade deficit now?
- Deficit with Europe
- European recession
- High dollar in early 2000s
- Deficit with Japan
- Slow growth of consumption in Japan
- Deficit with China
- Frozen value of Chinese currency
- Poorly developed domestic economy causes slow
growth of imports
27 Review
- Explain trade theories, government intervention
including integration - Discuss how global efficiency can be increased
through free trade - Introduce prescriptions for altering trade
patterns - Explore how business decisions influence
international trade
5-21