DO CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION CME ARTICLES FOSTER SHARED DECISIONMAKING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

DO CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION CME ARTICLES FOSTER SHARED DECISIONMAKING

Description:

Physicians must have a clear understanding of this information to ... M decin du Qu bec. 1,3 - 4,8. 3,3. 3,0 1,6. CMAJ. tendue. M diane. Moyenne cart-type ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jean307
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DO CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION CME ARTICLES FOSTER SHARED DECISIONMAKING


1
DO CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION (CME) ARTICLES
FOSTER SHARED DECISION-MAKING?
  • Michel Labrecque
  • Valérie Lafortune
  • Judith Lajeunesse
  • Anne-Marie Lambert-Perrault
  • Hermes Manrique
  • Johanne Blais
  • France Légaré

Canada Research Chair in Implementation of
Shared Decision Making in Primary Care
2
RELEVANCE
  • Providing the best available evidence on benefits
    and harms of all available options is an
    essential step to Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
    and Shared Decision-Making (SDM).
  • Physicians must have a clear understanding of
    this information to translate it to the patients.
  • CME articles reviews on clinical topics in
    medical journals - constitute one of physicians
    main sources of clinical information.
  • CME articles should provide this knowledge to
    physicians.

3
OBJECTIVE
  • To assess whether CME articles on therapeutic or
    preventive interventions provide the
    evidence-based information on benefits and harms
    of available options.

4
METHODOLOGY CME Articles
5
METHODOLOGY CME Articles
6 most recent CME articles on therapeutic or
preventive interventions in each journal Total
30
6
METHODOLOGY Evaluation Tool
  • A 10-item checklist based on the first two
    sections of the quality framework criteria of
  • Providing information about options in sufficient
    detail for decision making
  • Presenting probabilities of outcomes in an
    unbiased and understandable way.

7
METHODOLOGY Evaluation Tool
8
METHODOLOGY Evaluation Process
  • Independent evaluation
  • Each article randomly assigned to 2 residents in
    Family Medicine
  • Independent evaluation using the 10-item
    checklist
  • Consensus meeting
  • For each article
  • Comparison of score attributed to each of the 10
    items
  • Discrepancies discussed referring to the article
    as necessary
  • Consensus on each item (present 1 absent0)
  • Total score on 10

9
Mean and Median Score (on 10) of the 30 CME
Articles According to Journal
3.6
3.5
3.3
2.4
1.3
Kruskal-Wallis test, p 0.05
10
Mean and Median Scores of Each Item (n30)
11
BOTTOM LINE
Do CME articles foster evidence-based patient
choice and shared decision-making?
NO
12
BOTTOM LINE
Medical journals should require authors of CME
articles to describe information deemed essential
for evidence-based patient choice and SDM to
occur.
13
Thank you!
14
Statistiques descriptives du score consensuel
(sur 10) des articles de FMC selon le journal
Test de Kruskal-Wallis, p 0,05
15
Scores moyen (sur 10) des 10 présentations de FMC
présentées du 13-09-2007 au 20-11-2007 selon le
type
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com