Last Day - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Last Day

Description:

As mentioned, one way to compare portfolios is to examine the return earned by ... Recall: manger's should be evaluated based on their ability to pick securities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: kirkco
Category:
Tags: day | last | manger

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Last Day


1
Last Day
  • Started Portfolio Evaluation

2
Today
  • Portfolio Evaluation contd

3
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • As mentioned, one way to compare portfolios is to
    examine the return earned by alternative
    portfolios of the same risk
  • The most examined type of funds are mutual funds
  • Many authors have used the above technique to
    examine the performance of mutual funds under a
    number of scenarios

4
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • NOTE
  • If the investor desired a risk different from
    that offered by the fund, she/he could modify
    risk by lending and/or borrowing.
  • The relevant definition of performance may change
    if the problem is examined from the point of view
    of the fund manager
  • This leads us directly to our second measure of
    performance
  • Differential Return with Risk Measured by S.D.

5
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Differential Return with Risk Measured by S.D.
  • Recall mangers should be evaluated based on
    their ability to pick securities and combine them
    into a portfolio, given the risk level at which
    she/he is constrained to operate.
  • To illustrate this evaluation technique, consider
    the following example.

6
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Assume
  • We are evaluating a manager of an all-equity
    portfolio
  • Risk level is determined by the client
  • The manager is the only equity manager, so total
    risk is important
  • What should be evaluated in this case?
  • The managers ability to adhere to clients wishes
    and pick securities accordingly for the portfolio

7
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • To evaluate the manager we could compare how well
    they do in relation to the naïve strategy
  • This strategy relies on investing partly in the
    market portfolio and part in the riskless asset
  • Sound familiar?
  • It should, since weve dealt with this type of
    analysis already, but in a different context.

8
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Consider the case of evaluating fund A, where
    risk is determined by the client
  • To evaluate the managers performance, we compare
    the naïve strategys result to fund A.
  • To examine how the manager has done, consider the
    following diagram

9
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
Market Portfolio
A
M
Differential Return
A
RF
10
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • RECALL the slope of the ray connecting RF and M
    is
  • Using the intercept, which we know is RF we can
    write the equation of the line as

11
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • How would we determine the return on portfolio A
    in our earlier diagram?
  • It is determined by substituting the s.d. of A in
    the preceding formula and solving for the return
    of A
  • The differential return (what were interested in
    calculating) is, of course, then just the
    difference between the return earned on A and A.

12
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Example
  • Given

We get
Differential Return
13
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • With this measure, funds would be ranked
    according to their differential return
  • The best performing fund would obviously be the
    one with the highest differential return.
  • NOTE
  • It is important to realize that the relative
    ranking of funds will be affected by the choice
    of performance measure
  • To see this consider the following example

14
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
Which fund would be ranked first?
A
B
M
A
RF
B
15
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • What we have just done is evaluate the fund
    managers performance using the s.d. as the risk
    measure
  • But, what if nondiversifiable risk is deemed to
    be the appropriate measure of risk?
  • In that case, our analysis would change slightly,
    but luckily enough the two measures just
    discussed have counterparts to go along with this
    change is risk.

16
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Excess Return to Nondiversifiable Risk
  • This is similar to the first case we discussed
    (Sharpe measure), but is in expected return beta
    space this measure is often called the Treynor
    measure
  • The slope of the line connecting the riskless
    asset and risky portfolio is now
  • Once again the investor would prefer the most
    counterclockwise ray emanating form the riskless
    asset

17
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
A
The Treynor Measure
B
C
RF
D
18
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • NOTE The equation of the line is the same as
    before, except with betas

19
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • The final measure examines differential return
    when beta is the risk measure
  • Again, lets consider the line connecting the
    riskless rate and the market portfolio.
  • A manager could obtain any point along this line
    by investing in the market portfolio and mixing
    this with the riskless asset to obtain the
    desired risk level.

20
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Suppose managers choice is to actively manage
    the fund
  • Then the managers performance is the difference
    in return earned by actively managing the fund
    and the return that would have been earned by
    passively managing the fund
  • Passively managing here is referring to the rate
    that would have been earned if the manager
    invested in the market portfolio and riskless
    asset
  • NOTE we are comparing the performance based on
    the same risk level

21
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Given our comparison, the slope of the line
    connecting the riskless asset and the market
    portfolio is
  • Given this, we can write the equation of the line
    as,

22
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • The differential return, in this case, is the
    actual return less the return on the portfolio of
    identical Beta
  • NOTE the portfolio of identical Beta is lying on
    the line connecting the riskless asset and the
    market portfolio
  • To calculate the return it is simply a matter of
    plugging the beta of the portfolio into the
    previous equation

23
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Example
  • Market return is 10
  • Risk-free rate is 5
  • Beta on the portfolio being evaluated is 0.8
  • What is the expected return of a mixture of the
    market portfolio and the riskless asset to obtain
    a Beta of 0.8?

24
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Example contd
  • What is the differential return?
  • It is just the difference between the return on
    the portfolio and the 9 we just calculated.
  • NOTE
  • This measure was first proposed by Jensen
  • It is often referred to as the Jensen
    differential performance index

25
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Jensen Measure
  • Has special appeal because of its relationship to
    the CAPM.
  • While weve presented the relationship between
    the return on a fund and the return on a
    portfolio constructed by mixing the riskless
    asset and the market portfolio to obtain the same
    risk, there is another way to view it

26
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • The other way to view the Jensen measure is to
    use the CAPM equation to calculate the
    differential return
  • In this case the differential return is the
    difference in the return earned by the fund vs.
    the return the CAPM implies should be earned.
  • To see this more clearly consider the example of
    the following slide

27
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Example
  • Assume a zero beta version of the CAPM
  • This implies that the expected return on
    portfolio i is
  • This formula is used to calculate the exp.return
    implied by the zero Beta CAPM for a portfolio
    with the same risk as the portfolio being
    evaluated
  • The differential return is the return on the
    portfolio being evaluated, less the return
    implied by the zero Beta CAPM

28
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Techniques
  • Decomposition of overall evaluation
  • When attempting to decompose performance, were
    trying to determine what factors led to the
    success/failure of a manager.
  • That is, were interested in various aspects of
    performance that might affect overall
    performance.
  • One of the most widely referenced decompositions
    if by Eugene Fama (this is the fellow who came up
    with EMH)
  • His decomposition is illustrated in the following
    diagram

29
Portfolio Performance Decomposition
Net Selectivity
Return from Selectivity
Diversification
M
Total Excess Return
Return from Managers Risk
Return from Investors Risk
RF
30
Portfolio Performance Decomposition
  • In Famas decomposition Diagram
  • The line plotted represents all combinations of
    the riskless asset and portfolio M
  • As discussed, one possible strategy is for the
    manager with a desired risk level to achieve this
    level by holding a portfolio composed of the
    riskless asset and the market (RFM, plots the
    return to all such points)
  • The Jensen measure is A-A (that is the height
    above the line)

31
Portfolio Performance Decomposition
  • Contd
  • NOTE Portfolios A and A have the same beta,
    hence they have the same nondiversifiable risk
  • What they do not have is the same total risk!
  • The risk of the naïve strategy comes about
    because of the fluctuations in the market
    portfolio
  • thus the risk of portfolio A is completely
    nondiversifiable!

32
Portfolio Performance Decomposition
  • Contd
  • Portfolio A, however, is not strictly a market
    portfolio
  • Why not?
  • Remember
  • We are comparing A with a naïve portfolio, NOT
    with the same nondiversifiable risk, but rather
    with the same total risk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com