The Peer Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Peer Review

Description:

What kind of peer review would make a writer want to revise and improve a document? ... Are transitions between sentences and paragraphs smooth or jagged? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Matthew573
Category:
Tags: jagged | peer | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Peer Review


1
The Peer Review
  • Analytical and Rhetorical Writing
  • Matt Barton

2
One Minute Prompt
  • What kind of peer review would make a writer want
    to revise and improve a document?

3
What is a Peer Review?
  • A formal review of a document, usually written by
    a fellow scholar in the same academic field.
  • A description of a documents strengths and
    weaknesses.
  • Advice for improving the document.

4
Whats the point?
  • Journal or book editors may not know enough to
    evaluate a work.
  • Reviewers who are active members of their field
    can tell whether a work is well-researched,
    timely, and accurate.
  • Receiving the support of ones peers and
    colleagues helps a scholar establish credibility
    (ethos).

5
Why should students write peer reviews?
  • Writing students must learn not only how to edit
    their own work, but also the work of other
    writers.
  • Students can greatly benefit from reading other
    essays and identifying their strengths and
    weaknesses.
  • Peer reviews offer students the benefit of seeing
    how their writing affects a variety of readers.
  • Peer reviews let students learn collaboratively.

6
Good Peer Reviewing
  • An effective peer review has
  • A clear set of criteria
  • General comments balanced by specifics
  • Descriptions of what is effective and ineffective
    about a document
  • Specific and helpful advice about how the weak
    areas of a paper can be improved

7
Effective Peer Reviews are Polite, Specific, and
Helpful
I really enjoyed reading your essay. I hope you
will find my comments useful.
8
Bad Peer Reviews are Insulting and Ineffective
How did you get into college? Ive never read
such crap. Did you graduate high school? This is
the worst writing Ive ever read!!!
9
One Minute Writing 2
  • What is the difference between constructive
    criticism and destructive criticism?

10
What are good criteria?
  • All writing can be assessed using five criteria
  • Focus
  • Development
  • Organization
  • Style
  • Conventions

11
Focus
  • Does the document fulfill the requisites
    established by the writing assignment?
  • Is the writers topic too broad or too narrow for
    the length of the document?
  • Does the writer stay on topic, or drift off on
    unhelpful tangents?

12
Development
  • Does the writer provide enough specific details
    and concrete descriptions to balance abstractions
    and generalizations?
  • Has the writer attempted to defend arguments and
    justify assertions?
  • Has the writer explained terms or concepts that
    might confuse the audience?

13
Organization
  • Organization covers three basic areas
  • Titles
  • Introductions
  • Transitions
  • Conclusions
  • Lets talk about each in turn.

14
Titles
  • The title of an essay should
  • Catch the readers attention
  • Clearly indicate what the essay is about
  • Bad titles
  • Project 1, Ideal Learning Experience
  • Better title
  • I Saw the Sine Fun in Geometry

15
Introduction
  • The introduction of an essay should
  • State the issue
  • Establish your position
  • Explain how paper is organized
  • Identify the scope
  • Provide an interesting human angle to engage
    the readers attention

16
Transitions
  • Transitions are words, phrases, or sentences used
    to connect ideas.
  • A paper that lacks good transition will seem
    choppy or jumpy to a reader.
  • Use words and phrases like, However, Another
    point to consider, Despite these facts, and so
    on.
  • Transitions give readers a heads up about
    whats coming next in a paper

17
Conclusion
  • A good conclusion
  • Summarizes the issue, points, and arguments
    raised in the document.
  • Some conclusions also
  • Ask the reader to perform an action
  • Suggest additional reading materials
  • Identify aspects of the paper or the subject that
    need additional research
  • Bring closure to a human interest story raised
    in the introduction

18
Organization
  • Does the introduction identify the documents
    subject, scope, purpose, and organizational
    scheme?
  • Are transitions between sentences and paragraphs
    smooth or jagged?
  • Does the conclusion bring a sense of closure to
    the document and summarize its main points?

19
Style
  • Style refers to how easy and enjoyable it will be
    for an intended audience to read a document.
  • Word Choices Are they appropriate for the
    target audience?
  • Sentence Construction Are sentences clear,
    direct, graceful, and unambiguous?
  • Tone Has the writer maintained a consistent and
    appropriate tone towards the audience and the
    subject matter?

20
Conventions
  • Conventions refers to grammar, mechanics,
    citation methods, and all other matters involving
    rules or expectations regarding form.
  • A paper that strays widely from its discourse
    conventions may not be taken seriously by an
    audience.

21
Conventions
  • Has the writer used correct grammar and usage?
  • Is the citation method correct?
  • Does the document conform to the formatting
    guidelines specified by the assignment?

22
Responding to Essays
  • A student peer review consists of
  • A brief paragraph that describes the document and
    identifies its strengths and weaknesses
  • A series of in-text comments that indicate
    specific parts of the document
  • An invitation to discuss the comments and
    discussion with the writer via email

23
Microsoft Words Comment
Microsoft Word offers a very helpful tool called
Comments on its Reviewing Tool Bar.
24
Instructions for Comment
Make sure Reviewing has a check mark beside it!
Activate reviewing toolbar by clicking on view,
then toolbars, on Words Menu Bar.
25
Word Comments
Highlight parts of the text that you want to
comment on, then hit the button that resembles a
Yellow Post-It Note. This will Add a New Comment.
26
Comments
  • Place an F, D, S, O, or C in front of your
    comment so the reader will know which criteria it
    falls under

27
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Q. What if the paper is so good it doesnt need
    any changes?
  • Ive yet to see such a paper. Look a little
    harder at it and try to find something that can
    be improved! Dont be lazy remember, your peer
    needs your help!

28
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Q. What if I get bad advice in a peer review? Do
    I have to follow it?
  • Dont be silly. Its up to you whether or not you
    want to follow your peers advice. You will get a
    chance to critique your peer reviewers when you
    upload your final draft.

29
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Q. What if my peer reviewers dont do a good job?
  • Unfortunately, theres not a lot I can do about
    this situation. Not all students have the same
    work ethic or skill. Just try to do the best you
    can, and remember that they will not receive a
    good grade for poor peer reviews.

30
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Q. What if my peer reviewers never submit a peer
    review?
  • A. Dont sweat. You wont be penalized, but they
    will receive an F for their review grade.

31
Five Tips for Better Peer Reviews
  1. Always point out specific parts of the paper that
    need improvement.
  2. Ask the writer questions about parts of the paper
    you dont understand.
  3. Spend as much time identifying strengths as you
    do identifying weaknesses.
  4. Be polite and always direct your comments at the
    document, not the writer.
  5. Try to identify patterns of error and offer the
    writer advice about correcting them.

32
One-Minute Writing 3
  • What have you learned about peer reviewing today?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com