yudkevichhse'ru

1
????????????????? ?????????

• ??-???

2
??????? ????? ????????

• ??????? ?? ?????
• yudkevich_at_hse.ru
• ????????? ? ?????????? ?? ?????
• http//new.hse.ru/sites/nie

3
??? ????? ????? ?? ??????

• ????????? ?????
• ????? ?????? ? ?????????
• ?????????? ??????
• ?????? ?????? ??? ????????
• ???????? ???????
• ???? ? ??????? ????????? ????????????????? ?????
• ???????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ???????????
  ?????
• ??????? ???????? ?? ?????
• ??????? ? ????????

4
?????? 1. ?????? ?????????????????? ???????
5
????? ??????? ????? ????????????

• ??????????? ??????????????? ??????
• ??? ??????????? ????????????????? ???????
• ????????????????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????????
  ????????????????? ??????

6

• Sometimes anything additional to or critical of
  the classical or hedonic economics is deemed to
  be institutional. Sometimes that is dynamic
  instead of static, or a process instead of
  commodities, or activity instead of feelings, or
  management instead of equilibrium, or control
  instead of laissez-faire, seems to be
  institutional economics.
• J. Commons

7
??????????????? ??????

• ???????????????? ?????????????
• ??????????? ?????????????? ???????
• ?????? ? ??????????? ??????????
• ????????? ??????-??????????
• ???????????? ???????
• ????? ???????? ?????? ???????
• ??? ???????????? ?????? ????? ??????????????
  ????????? ??????????????

8
???????? ?????? ????????? ??? ???????????? ?????

• ????????? ? ???????? ??? ??????? ???????
• ???????????? ????????? ??? ????????? ????????
• ??????? ????????????????? ??????????????
• ???????? ? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????????????? ?
  ????????????? ????????
• ?????

9

• For only individuals can feel wants. Certain
  assumptions concerning those wants and the
  effects of satisfaction on their intensity give
  us our utility curves, which, therefore, have a
  clear meaning only for individuals Society as
  such, having no brain or nerves in physical
  sense, cannot feel wants and has not, therefore,
  utility curves like those of individuals.
• Again, the stock of commodities existing in the
  country is at the disposal, not of society, but
  of individuals and individuals do not meet to
  find out what the wants of society are. They
  severely apply their means to the satisfaction of
  their own wants.
• Theory doesnt suggest that these wants are
  necessarily of an exclusively egoistical
  character. We want many things not for ourselves,
  but for others and some of them, like
  battleships, we want for the interest of
  community only. Even such altruistic and or
  social wants, however, are felt and taken account
  of by individuals or their agents, and not by
  society as such.
• Josef Schumpeter, 1909

10
???????????????? ?????????????

• ???????? ????????? ??? ? ??????? ?????????????
  ???????
• ???????????? ???????? ????? ??????????????
  ????????
• ??????????? ?????????? ????? ?????????? ???????
  ????? ?????? ?????????????? ????????.

11

• The hedonic conception of man is that of a
  lighting calculator of pleasures and pains, who
  oscillates like a homogeneous globule of desire
  of happiness under the impulse of stimuli that
  shift him about the area, but leave him intact.
  He has neither antecedent nor consequent. He is
  as isolated, definitive human datum, in stable
  equilibrium except for the buffets of the
  impinging forces that displace him in one
  direction or another.
• Veblen, 1898

12
???????????????????

• ???????????????? ?????????????
• ????????? ??????-??????????
• ?????????????? ????????? ?????????
• ?????????????? ? ????????? ??????????
• ?????????????? ??????
• ???????? ???????????? ? ?????? ???? ?????????????

13
????????? ?????

• ?????? ?????????????????? ???????
• ????????? ? ????????????? ???????
• ?????? ?????????????? ????????
• ?????? ??????????
• ?????? ???? ?????????????
• ?????? ???????????
• ????????????????? ?????? ???????????
• ?????? ????????????????? ?????????

14
??????????

• ????????? ?.?., ?????????? ?.?., ??????? ?.?.
  ???? ????????????????? ????????? ?????????,
  ????, ?????????????? ???????? ? ?????????,
  ??-???, 2005.
• ??????????, ?. ????????????? ????????? ?
  ?????????, 2002.
• ????, ?. ?????????, ????????????????? ?????????
  ? ???????????????? ?????????, 1997
• ???????, ?.?., ??????????, ?.?., ????????, ?.?.
  ?????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ? ??????,
  2002.