International Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

International Business

Description:

To profile the evolving understanding of the organization of ... Demoralized lower-level workers Cross-unit coordination and wait for instructions. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:107
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: chow151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Business


1
International Business
  • Chapter Fifteen
  • The Organization of International Business

2
Chapter Objectives
  • To profile the evolving understanding of the
    organization of international business
  • To describe traditional and contemporary
    organizational structures
  • To study the systems used to coordinate and
    control operations
  • To profile the role of organizational culture
  • To examine special situations in the organization
    of international business

3
Introduction
  • Organization the complementary mix of formal
    structure, coordination and control systems, and
    cultural values needed to create value and
    implement an organizations strategy
  • An insightful strategy is a necessary but
    insuf-ficient condition for long-term
    organizational success.
  • Building an organization to implement an
    effective strategy requires the integration of
    different people, teams, groups, and units into
    a smoothly functioning whole.

4
Fig. 15.1 The Organization of International
Business
5
The Causes of Organizational Change
  • Revolutionary changes in the environment and the
    nature of work challenge managers to downsize,
    delayer, restructure, reengineer, and reinvent
    the organization.
  • globalization changes the opportunity set and
    efficiency frontier for firms
  • knowledge an increasingly important engine of
    sus-tainable comparative advantage
  • the Internet an efficient and effective global
    organi-zation of knowledge, people, and other
    resources that challenge conventional notions of
    control
  • continued

6
  • the conduct and context of employees jobs the
    creation of value that exhibits astonishing
    variability, problem solving, and intellectual
    content
  • worldwide employee empowerment decentralized
    decision-making and the development of common
    ideas and ideals to ensure that all employees act
    in the best interests of the firm
  • an expanded social contract between employees and
    organizations includes greater employee
    participation in problem-solving and
    decision-making
  • increasingly sophisticated corporate strategies
    new combinations of key activities leading to new
    organi-zational requirements

7
Organizational Structure
  • Organizational structure the formal arrangement
    of roles, responsibilities, and relationships
    within an organization
  • Organizational differentiation the way in which
    different units and subunits within a firm are
    organized and assigned to work on different
    levels and kinds of tasks
  • A companys choice of structure depends upon
  • the configuration of its value chain in
    terms of the location(s) and
    type(s) of its foreign
    facilities
  • the impact of international operations
    on total corporate performance

8
Vertical Differentiation
  • Vertical differentiation the way in which an
    organization balances centralized vs.
    decentralized decision-making alternatives the
    locus of power
  • Centralization the degree to which high-level
    managers (usually above the country level) make
    decisions and then pass them down to lower levels
    for implementation
  • Decentralization the degree to which
    lower-level managers (at or below the country
    level) make and implement important decisions
  • Usually, centralized decision-making is
    associated with an international or global
    strategy, decentralized decision-making with a
    multidomestic strategy, and a combination of the
    two with a transnational strategy.
  • All organizations must determine who will have
    what authority to
    make which decisions.
  • continued

9
  • The reason for choosing one type of
    decision-making authority over another is partly
    a function of attitude.
  • see Chapter Two regarding the cultural
    environment
  • ethnocentric attitude encourages an
    international or global firm to develop core
    competencies in its home country and then closely
    supervise their transfer and use abroad i.e.,
    centralized decision-making
  • polycentric attitude encourages a multidomestic
    firm to grant decision-making authority to
    foreign subsidiaries, i.e., decentralized
    decision-making
  • geocentric attitude encourages a transnational
    firm to creatively balance the competing needs
    for centralized and decentralized
    decision-making in order to respond to both
    global and local pressures
  • Decision-making should occur at the level of the
    people most directly affected and who have the
    most intimate knowledge about the problemthe
    current trend is toward more decentralized
    structures.

10
The Principles and Practice of Centralization and
Decentralization
  • CENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION
  • Premises Premises
  • Decisions should be made by Decisions
    should be made by senior managers.
    lower-level employees.
  • The effectiveness of the value The
    effectiveness of the value chain depends on
    headqtrs. chain depends on local retaining
    authority. managers authority.
  • Centralized decisions ensure Decentralized
    decisions ensure that operations in
    different that operations in different countries
    help achieve global countries help achieve global
    objectives. objectives by first meeting
    national goals.
  • continued

11
The Principles and Practice of Centralization and
Decentralization
  • CENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION
  • Advantages Advantages
  • Coordination of the value chain Decisions
    are made by those is facilitated. who
    are directly involved.
  • Decisions are consistent with Lower-level
    managers are corporate objectives. allowed to
    exercise initiative.
  • Duplicate activities are pre-.
    Lower-level employees are empted. motivated
    to perform better.
  • The risk of costly, wrong, lower- Flexible
    responses to rapid level decisions is
    reduced. changes are enabled.
  • Consistent dealing with stake- Subsidiary
    managers are held holders is ensured.
    more accountable.
  • continued

12
The Principles and Practice of Centralization and
Decentralization
  • CENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION
  • Disadvantages Disadvantages
  • Initiative among lower-level The
    organization is put at risk employees is
    discouraged. if bad, lower-level decisions
    are made.
  • Demoralized lower-level workers Cross-unit
    coordination and wait for instructions.
    strategic fit are impeded.
  • Information flows from the top Subsidiaries
    likely favor their down thus, bottom-up own
    projects at the expense innovation is
    pre-empted. of global performance.
  • continued

13
The Principles and Practice of Centralization and
Decentralization
  • CENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION
  • Encouraging Factors Encouraging Factors
  • Corporate policies call for global Conditions
    call for local re- integration and uniformity.
    sponsiveness and adaptation.
  • Interdependent subsidiaries The firm is
    geographically share value activities. dispersed
    .
  • Firms need to move resources Economies of
    scale can be from one activity to another.
    achieved nationally.
  • Upper-level managers are more Lower-level
    managers are more experienced decision-makers.
    capable decision-makers.
  • Decisions are important and Decisions are
    relatively minor the risk of loss is great. but
    must be made quickly.
  • The need for foreign nationals
    to reach headqtrs. is low.

14
Horizontal Differentiation
  • Horizontal differentiation the way in which a
    firm is divided into discrete units and sub-units
    that are assigned responsibility for specialized
    tasks
  • Horizontal differentiation describes the way in
    which a firm designs its formal structure in
    order to
  • specify the total set of organizational tasks
  • logically divide those tasks into jobs,
    departments, subsidiaries, and/or divisions
  • assign authority and reporting relationships in
    ways that are designed to support the firms
    strategies
  • Traditionally MNEs have resolved these issues on
    the basis of function, type of
    business/product, geographic region, or
    some combination of the three.

15
The Design of the Formal Structure
  • Functional Structure
  • groups specialized jobs according
    to traditional business
    functions specifies
    roles and relationships
    according to inputs
  • maximizes scales economies by arranging work
    responsibilities and relationships in the most
    efficient format
  • is ideal when a companys products share a common
    technology (a narrow product line) and
    competitive pressures push for a cost-leadership
    strategy
  • The long chain of command that spans many levels
    of hierarchy does not build the
    knowledge-generating and decision-making
    relationships necessary to respond to
    environmental changes requiring coordination
    across departments.
  • continued

16
The Design of the Formal Structure
  • Divisional Structures
  • establish groups according to units, products,
    customers, or regions specifies roles and
    relationships according to outputs
  • International Division creates a critical mass
    of international
    expertise, but may
    struggle to get resources
  • Product Division creates synergies between
    foreign and domestic operations, is well-suited
    for diverse product lines, but lacks
    the means for one
    division to learn from another
  • Geographic Division creates economies of scale
    on a regional basis, works well when foreign
    operations are large but
    not dominated by a
    single region or country, but leads to
    the costly duplication of
    similar value-added activities continued

17
The Design of the Formal Structure
  • Matrix Structure
  • simultaneously attains the benefits of the
    functional and divisional forms theoretically
    equips an MNE to capture the benefits of both
    integration and responsiveness
  • gives functional, product, and geographic groups
    a common focus
  • has dual reporting relationships rather than a
    single chain of command, thus ensuring the
    exchange of information and resources
  • Blurred lines of responsibility and
    relationships confuse the clarity of the chain of
    command, even though groups are required to
    compete for resources and control.
  • Mixed Structure each is idiosyncratic,
    reflecting legacies, executive preferences,
    and/or circumstances a combi- nation of
    functional, regional, and product dimensions

18
Fig. 15.2 Placement of International Activities
within the Organizational Structures for
International Businesses
19
Contemporary Structures
  • Contemporary Structures learning organizations
    that champion limitless spans of control, ad hoc
    teams, and self-organizing groups by eliminating
    vertical, horizontal, and external boundaries
    that hinder information flows
  • Network Structure a small, core organization
    that outsources certain value activities to key
    partners in order to focus on those activities in
    which it creates maximum value
  • Japanese keiretsus rely heavily upon long-term
    personal relationships among high-level
    managers in different companies.
  • Virtual Organization a temporary arrangement
    among partners that can be easily reassembled to
    adapt to market changes permits organizations to
    acquire resources and/or strategic capabilities
    by creating a temporary cluster of partners
  • Project Structure all work is project
    basedteams form, disband, and form again as the
    flow of work requires

20
Fig. 15.3 A Simple Depiction of the
Network Structure
21
Coordination Systems
  • Coordination systems link the operations of
    inter-dependent units and individuals of a firm
  • Coordination by standardization
  • sets universal rules and procedures that apply to
    units worldwide a prescriptive, day-to-day
    infrastructure
  • enforces consistency in the performance of
    activities across geographically dispersed units
  • helps a firm leverage its core competencies and
    bring the advantages of scale to its
    operations
  • is ideally suited for strategies that champion
    constancy and predictability in industries that
    are more stable than volatile, i.e., an
    international or geocentric strategy
  • continued

22
  • Coordination by plan
  • requires interdependent units to meet common
    deadlines and objectives
  • is ideally suited for firms that create value by
    adapting operations to local conditions, i.e., a
    multidomestic strategy
  • Coordination by mutual adjustment
  • requires managers to interact with counterparts
    to enable the flexible exchange of ideas
  • requires that firms adopt a formal structure and
    install standardization and planning systems
  • is ideally suited for firms that find value in
    creating more opportunities and incentives for
    interdependent parties to communicate with one
    another, i.e., when firms face new problems that
    cannot be defined with customary rules or
    procedures

23
Control Systems
  • Control process directs and monitors the
    activities of individuals in order to compel
    actions that support the goals of the firm
  • Control methods
  • market control uses external market mechanisms
    to establish internal performance benchmarks and
    standards complements a geocentric strategy
  • bureaucratic control uses centralized authority
    to install an extensive set of rule and
    procedures to govern a broad range of activities
  • clan control relies upon share values among all
    employees to idealize and moderate preferred
    employee behaviors complements a transnational
    strategy
  • continued

24
  • Control mechanisms
  • reports should be timely to allow an effective
    response
  • subsidiary visits should balance information
    collection and sharing with the offering of
    advise and directives
  • management performance evaluation should
    separate a managers performance from a
    subsidiarys performance
  • cost and accounting comparability should
    interpret different costs and accounting
    practices fairly
  • evaluative measurements should include a
    reliable combination of financial and
    non-financial indicators
  • information systems should periodically
    reevaluate information needs in order to minimize
    costs and ensure relevancy

25
Organization Culture
  • Organization culture the set of fundamental
    assumptions about an organization, its goals,
    and its practices that employees share
  • Key features of a firms organization culture
    include
  • managerial values and principles
  • the work climate and atmosphere
  • patterns of how things are done around here
  • traditions
  • ethical standards
  • Studies confirm a significant link between
    organization culture and the
    financial performance of a firm.

26
Strategy and Organization Culture
  • The shared values of an organization influence
    both employees perceptions as well as the ways
    in which they respond to the world.
  • Sustainable benefits and lasting competitive
    advantage can only be realized when a firm
    exhibits a complemen-tary organization culture
  • an international strategy requires rules,
    regulations, and uniformity
  • a global strategy requires standardizing
    employees views
  • a multidomestic strategy requires greater
    tolerance of the local interpretation of
    corporate goals
  • a transnational strategy requires a strategic
    blending of standardization and adaptation, i.e.,
    dynamic flexibility

27
Fig. 15.4 Organizational Culture Aspects of
Types of Strategies
28
Special Situations
  • Acquisitions the culture of an acquired
    organi-zation may differ because of both company
    and national practices
  • Shared ownership decision-making is limited and
    assumptions and behavior will likely differ when
    two or more entities share ownership
  • Dynamic nature of performance as a firms
    international business evolves, both its
    organiza-tional structure and its coordination
    and control systems must also evolve

29
The Role of Legal Structures
  • When operating abroad, firms choose among legal
    forms that affect their decision-making power,
    their tax exposure, their ability to protect
    intellectual property, and their legal liability.
  • Foreign branch a wholly-owned foreign
    oper-ation that remains legally part of the
    parent company
  • Subsidiary a legally separate company, i.e.,
    a foreign direct investment, whose liability is
    usually limited to the subsidiarys assets
  • continued

30
  • Types of subsidiaries and operating form, i.e.,
    distinc-tions to be heeded in designing a foreign
    operation
  • the ability of the parent to sell its ownership
  • the number of stockholders required to establish
    a subsidiary
  • the percentage of foreigners who can serve on the
    board of directors
  • the amount of required public disclosure
  • whether equity may be acquired by noncapital
    contribu-tions such as goodwill
  • the types of businesses (products) that are
    eligible
  • the minimum capital required for establishing a
    subsidiary

31
Implications/Conclusions
  • Organization is an integrated function of formal
    structure, coordination and control systems, and
    organizational culture.
  • The degree of centralization in an MNE is
    influenced by pressures for global integration
    versus local responsiveness, the competence of
    headquarters versus subsidiary personnel, as well
    as decision importance, expediency, and quality
    expectations.

32
  • Artfully engineering an organization that
    configures globally dispersed resources to meet
    the mandates of multinational operations is the
    frontier of inter-national business.
  • While traditional organizational structures rely
    on hierarchical formats, contemporary structures
    eliminate the horizontal, vertical, and/or
    external boundaries that block the development of
    knowledge-generating and decision-making
    relationships.
  • MNEs need to develop coordination and control
    mechanisms that prevent the duplication of
    efforts, ensure that headquarters does not
    withhold the best resources from international
    operations, and include insights from across the
    entire firm.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com