Title: Jay S. Newman, Esq.
1Promotions That Make the Grade Sweepstakes Law
101
Presented by Jay S. Newman, Esq. Fish
Richardson P.C. 1425 K Street, N.W. Suite
1100 Washington, DC 20005
2Win Big Prizes!
- Enter by texting A to 703-963-5761 from your
cell phone - One grand prize winner and one runner-up prize
winner will be randomly selected - Standard text messaging fees will apply
- Or, enter online by sending an e-mail to
newman_at_fr.com with Make the Grade! in the
subject line and A in the body of the message - Or, enter by mail by sending a 3½? x 5 ½?
postcard to me at my work address - All entries must be received tonight
3Issues to Consider
- Lottery laws
- Clear disclosure of material terms
- Unique state requirements
- Oops! . . . Promotions that did not make the grade
4Avoiding Lottery Laws
- Lotteries consist of the following three
elements - A prize
- Awarded by chance
- For consideration
- State-run lotteries are generally legal
- Non-profit raffles may be legal
- Commercial entities generally cannot conduct
lotteries - One of the three lottery elements must be
eliminated for a commercial entity to conduct a
lawful promotion
5What is Consideration?
- Payment to participate
- Purchase of a product or service
- Substantial effort
- Multiple store visits?
- Fill-out lengthy survey?
- Disclosure of personal information? (commercial
benefit theory)
6What is NOT Consideration?
- Examples of entry methods that are not
consideration - Mail-in entry
- Calling a toll-free number
- Watching a TV show
- Completing a brief survey
- Online access?????
- Standard text messaging charges????? (Definitely
not premium billed charges)
7How Do You Offer a Legal Game of Chance?
- Offer free method of entry
- Clearly disclose existence of free method of
entry - Comply with Equal Dignity Rule
8Equal Dignity Doctrine
- All paid entries and free entries must be
treated equally - Same entry limit for all entrants
- Same deadlines for all methods of entry
- Same prize pools
- No appearance of favoring paid entries over
free entries - Special concerns regarding instant win games
- Consider text messaging example
9Contests
- Examples Trivia contest, essay contest, photo
contest, etc. - Winner is selected based on skill, not chance
- Skill must be bona fide
- In many states (not all) consideration is allowed
10Skill Criteria
- Entrants must have opportunity to exercise skill
- Class of entrants must possess the skill
- Skill must sufficiently govern the result
- Ties must be broken on the basis of skill
- Judging criteria must be clearly disclosed
- Judging criteria must be objective
- Judges must be qualified to apply criteria
- Entrants must compete on equal playing field
11Recap Skill vs. Chance
- Skill
- Talent contest
- Cooking contest
- Writing contest
- Spelling contest
- Math contest
- Art Contest
- No Skill
- Guessing number of jelly beans
- First 50 to respond
- Predicting the result of a game or event
- Random draw sweepstakes
12Additional Issues Related to Consideration
- Post consideration may be acceptable
- FTC has ruled that consumers may be required to
provide consideration to claim prizes they have
already won - Many states have special prize pre-notification
statutes (disclosure requirements) - Potential concern in some states
- Preexisting consideration is generally
permissible - Sweepstakes limited to existing customers
- Should limit the frequency of these sweepstakes
- Make no representation that customer-only
sweepstakes will be offered
13Disclosure of Material Terms and ConditionsAd
Copy and Official Rules
- Not misleading or deceptive re nature of prize,
conduct of promotion, chances of winning - Key disclosures
- No Purchase Necessary
- Free method of entry
- Entry deadlines
- Subject to Official Rules
- Basic geographic and age eligibility requirements
- Odds of winning
- Identification of sponsor
- Voided states
14Ad Copy Where, When and How to Disclose
- Some states have specific requirements for
advertising - Requirements may vary depending on medium
- Print (e.g. Florida)
- Television/Radio (e.g., FCC and network
requirements) - On-site
- Telemarketing
- Direct Mail (e.g., Deceptive Mail Prevention and
Enforcement Act) - Advertising must be consistent with, and disclose
key elements of, Official Rules - Disclosures must be clear and conspicuous
15Official Rules
- Official Rules are a binding contract between
Sponsor and participants and should be easily
accessible and available without purchase - Elements
- Identification of Sponsor(s)
- Eligibility Requirements
- Start and End Dates (Specific time, time zone)
- Entry Particulars methods of entry, deadlines,
limits - Odds of Winning
- Prize Descriptions number awarded, values,
restrictions, taxes
16Prize Description
- Automobiles
- Year, make, model and all options
- ARV
- Drivers license and insurance
- Trips
- Days/nights
- ARV
- Hotel accommodations, meals, activities
- Travel documents
- To/from
- Age of companion
17Additional Elements of Official Rules
- Winner Selection/Prize Claim Requirements
- Limitations on Liability
- Ownership of Entries
- Use of Winner Image/Intellectual Property
- Instructions to Obtain Winners List/Copy of
Official Rules - Additional requirements for skill contests
18Unique State Laws
- Registration and Bonding Requirements
- Advertising Requirements
- Other
19State Bonding and Registration Requirements
- Registration
- Florida and New York if prize in game of chance
exceeds 5,000 - Rhode Island if retail establishment offers a
prize in a game of chance valued at more than
500 - Arizona if intellectual skill contest requiring
purchase to enter - Bonding
- Florida and New York for games of chance with
prizes exceeding 5,000
20Advertising Requirements
- Advertising Disclosures
- e.g., California requires special disclosures for
contests and sweepstakes when a store visit is
required - Posting Rules at Retail (FL, MA, MI, NY, RI, TX)
- Publication and Distribution of Winners List
(NY, FL, Others) - Awarding of All Prizes (FL, Others)
- Retain Records (NY, FL, Others)
21Other Unique State Law Requirements
- No SASE for Official Rules or Entry (Vermont)
- No required publicity release (Tennessee)
- No entry fee for games of skill (Florida,
Maryland, Delaware, others)
22Oops . . . Problem Promotions
- Daily News
- Kraft
- McDonalds
23Daily News Fiasco (March 2005)
- Scratch N Match in-paper game
- News published numbers to be scratched on game
pieces - 13 was published instead of 12
- Printing error resulted in thousands of players
thinking that they had won the 100,000 prize - Employee of sweepstakes administrator hit the
wrong key and mistake was not caught - News refused to honor prize claims, but offered
to hold drawing for 1 million in prizes for
claimants
24Daily News Fiasco The Fallout
- Protests from angry players at News building
- Meet the Match Coalition
- Organized by angry players to increase payouts,
supported by Councilman Charles Barron - Threatened to approach News major advertisers,
boycott News and stop newspapers delivery trucks - Rival New York Post published critical articles,
editorials and cartoons sent 1 million peanuts
to News building (claimed News offer of 1
million drawing was peanuts) - Lawsuits filed by prize claimants alleged breach
of contract and negligence
25Daily News Fiasco Lawsuits
- Dismissed by two NY courts, upholding Official
Rules - Breach of contract Official Rules made it clear
that - No more than stated number of prizes would be
awarded - Chance of winning was very remote
- In event of error, winner would be determined by
random drawing from all claims received - Negligence Official Rules provided that neither
News nor administrator would be liable in event
of printing, production or other error - Court A party may contractually absolve itself
from negligence
26Kraft Ready to Roll Sweepstakes (June 1989)
- Game cards placed inside packages of cheese
slices - Odds of winning Grand Prize (car) 1 in
15,160,000 - Mistakenly printed and seeded far too many
winning game pieces, resulting in virtually all
pieces being winners - Attempts to cancel contests resulted in class
action lawsuits and regulatory attention
(potential exposure of 270 million) - Ultimately settled disputes for 10 million
- Now, Official Rules include Kraft clause
protecting Sponsor/administrator in event of error
27McDonalds Monopoly Sweepstakes
- Since 1995, security chief of sweepstakes
administrator (Simon Marketing) stole 13 million
worth of winning game pieces, distributed them to
others and received kick-backs from winnings - On receiving a tip, FBI initiated investigation,
with cooperation of McDonalds - Simon Marketing lost accounts of McDonalds, then
Kraft and Philip Morris (77 of its business) - McDonald's conducted Instant Giveaway awarding
10 million in prizes over five days through
visits to 55 randomly chosen locations
28The Ultimate Nightmare . . . KDND-FM (Sacramento,
CA)
- Death of contestant in radio stations
water-drinking contest - Wrongful death suit, Sheriff investigation result
29Affidavits/Releases
- Collect from winner before awarding prize
- Function
- Affidavit Affirmation that winner has met
eligibility requirements - Liability/Publicity Release
- Releases Sponsor from liability in connection
with Sweepstakes, prize - Gives Sponsor right to use winners name,
likeness, etc. in promotions - Addresses intellectual property rights when
entrant-generated content is at issue - If winner may be accompanied by guest(s), collect
Affidavits/Releases from guest(s) as well
30Other Potential Issues/Laws to Consider
- Online Promotions
- Contests Involving Participant-Generated Content
- Security
- COPPA and other laws applicable to privacy
- Direct Mail
31Questions?
- newman_at_fr.com
- (202) 626-6388