Competition for the MMPI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Competition for the MMPI

Description:

344 items, 22 scales (4 validity, 11 clinical, 5 treatment consideration, 2 ... Z - Debasement. Validity Index. V - Validity. Report ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:222
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: cfe61
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competition for the MMPI


1
Competition for the MMPI
  • The 800-Pound Gorilla effect
  • Criticisms of the MMPI
  • Too long
  • Confusing-named Scales
  • Scale overlap
  • Too focused on maladaptive functioning
  • Forced answer format
  • Not directly tied to DSM-IV

2
Personality Assessment Inventory
  • 1991 Leslie Morey (Texas AM)
  • 344 items, 22 scales (4 validity, 11 clinical, 5
    treatment consideration, 2 interpersonal
    functioning)
  • Likert-scale items
  • Non-overlapping scales
  • 4th grade reading level
  • Interpretive software
  • Theoretical item development (high face validity)
  • Good reliability

3
PAI-SP Clinical Report Full Scale Profile -
Antisocial Personality Disorder Example
4
PAI-SP Clinical Report Subscale Profile -
Antisocial Personality Disorder Example
5
PAI overview
  • Reasonable alternative to MMPI, good test overall
  • Does not have wealth of data that MMPI does
  • Software provides suggested diagnoses
  • Better tied to DSM-IV
  • A little easier to fake (but has validity
    scales which help)
  • Likert items confusing to some respondents

6
California Psychological Inventory
  • Designed to produce culturally fair personality
    test for non-clinical populations
  • 434 forced answer items
  • 5th grade reading level
  • Has been translated into 29 languages
  • Validity scales related to faking good, bad and
    christmastreeing

7
CPI
  • Class I (Interpersonal adequacy) scales
    Dominance, Capacity for Status, Sociability,
    Social Presence, Self-Acceptance, Independence,
    Empathy
  • Class II (values) Responsibility, Socialization,
    Self-Control, Good Impression, Communality,
    Well-Being, Tolerance

8
CPI Continued
  • Class III (Achievement) Achievement via
    conformance, Achievement via independence,
    Intellectual efficiency
  • Class IV (Personal styles) Psychological
    mindedness, Flexibility, femininity/masculinity
  • Generally doesnt tell you much of clinical
    utility

9
Uses
  • Probably a good measure for people interested in
    their personality and self-exploration
  • Not likely useful for clinical diagnosis,
    treatment outcome, etc
  • Unlikely to be reimbursed by most insurance
    companies (even those that reimburse for
    psychological testing)

10
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory
  • Has typical validity scales and some clinical
    scales (thought disorder, depression, anxiety,
    etc.)
  • Focus is on Axis II, however
  • 175 forced answer
  • 8th grade reading level

11
Scales List
  • Clinical Personality Pattern Scales (DSM-IV, Axis
    II)1 - Schizoid2A - Avoidant2B - Depressive3
    - Dependent4 - Histrionic5 - Narcissistic6A -
    Antisocial6B - Sadistic (Aggressive)7 -
    Compulsive8A - Negativistic (Passive-Aggressive)
    8B - Masochistic (Self-Defeating)
  • Severe Personality Pathology ScalesS -
    SchizotypalC - BorderlineP - Paranoid
  • Clinical Syndrome Scales (DSM-IV, Axis I)A -
    AnxietyH - SomatoformN - Bipolar Manic D -
    DysthymiaB - Alcohol DependenceT - Drug
    DependenceR - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Severe Syndrome ScalesSS - Thought DisorderCC -
    Major DepressionPP - Delusional Disorder
  • Modifying IndicesX - DisclosureY -
    DesirabilityZ - Debasement
  • Validity IndexV - Validity

12
Report
  • http//www.pearsonassessments.com/reports/mcmi3pro
    file.pdf
  • Generally keeps to DSM-IV
  • Views PDs as dimensional
  • Includes some not in DSM-IV (or included for
    further study)
  • Passive-Aggressive, Dependent, Sadistic,
    Self-Defeating,

13
Summary
  • Shorter, reliable, generally valid measure
  • Good if concerned about Axis II
  • Some concerns about its validity in forensic
    populations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com