Army CIO Executive Board Opening Remarks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Army CIO Executive Board Opening Remarks

Description:

Identity Management & Security Framework Tiger Team. Active Directory Consolidation ... 21. Army's Governance Model. Chief, NGB (as required) Objective: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:559
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: gerryle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Army CIO Executive Board Opening Remarks


1
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
LandWarNet Conference 2009
Track 3 Army Knowledge Management
Army CIO/G-6 SAIS-GK How We Govern An Army
Enterprise in conjunction with the DoD
Enterprise Ms. Sonya Phillips, Chief Governance
Program Office
Session 3 19 Aug 2009 / 0945-1100
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
2
UNCLASSIFIED
LandWarNet 2009
  • PURPOSE To provide an overview of how the
    Armys IT Governance framework supports DoD
    capabilities
  • OBJECTIVES By the end of this presentation you
    will
  • Be knowledgeable of the DOD Governance framework
  • Understand how the Armys LandWarNet DoD
    governance frameworks integrate
  • Understand the roles and responsibilities of the
    Armys IT Governance forums and how decisions
    are made

3
Agenda
  • DOD Governance Overview
  • Armys LandWarNet Governance Framework
  • Army Governance Boards and Forums
  • Actions to Date
  • Questions

4
DOD Implementation and Governance
A shared vision, mission and governing principles
5
DOD CIO Governance Structure
DoD CIO
DoD CIO Executive Board
  • Vision high level interpretation compliance
  • Top cover
  • Recommends directly to the DoD CIO
  • Tie breaker
  • Escalated problem resolution

CIO/C4
Information Assurance Senior Leaders Chair DASD
(CIIA)
  • DoD CIO vision interpretation, strategies
    policies
  • Capability architectures approval
  • Acquisition oversight (Non-MAIS MDAP)
  • DBSMC Cert/IRB
  • Issue adjudication

Enterprise Guidance Board Chair DoD DCIO
  • IA policy and guidance
  • GIAP guidance

Enterprise Operations Oversight Committee Chairs
Dir, Enterprise Operations STRATCOM Rep
Enterprise Services Review Group Chairs DISA
(PEO GES) Dir, Enterprise Svcs Integration
Technical Standards Enterprise Architecture
Review Group Chairs Dir, Enterprise
Architecture Standards DISA CSE (GES-G)
IA Enterprise Review Group Chair PD DASD CIIA
  • Compliance/Enforcement of Net Ops/Operational IA
    (policy, guidance)
  • GIG certification accreditation
  • Compliance/Enforcement of sustained operations
    through
  • - Configuration management
  • - Architecture
  • - GIG Waivers
  • - Operational connections process
  • - Test integration
  • - Interoperability and supportability
  • ES strategic planning, policy implementation
  • Data/Service strategies coord
  • Solution synchronization
  • Information sharing
  • Service registries
  • Interoperability
  • ES to tactical edge
  • IA Architecture approval and engineering guidance
  • IA Standards and configuration management
  • Assure integration and compliance of capabilities
    solutions
  • Architecture approval at the enterprise level
  • Manage architecture federation
  • Define architecture compliance criteria
  • Maintain authoritative sources of IT standards
    and implementation-level specifications

6
CIO Policy, Guidance, Oversight
On-Going Corresponding Army Efforts
  • Unity of Command and Global Authentication
  • NetOps Directive Strategic Vision
    Implementation Plan
  • Identity Management Security Framework Tiger
    Team
  • Active Directory Consolidation
  • Joint Infrastructure and Common Standard,
    Policies Procedures
  • Enterprise Service Designation Governance
    Process Policy
  • Installation Common IT Catalog and Delivery Plan
  • Identity Management Security Framework
  • Enterprise eMail Consolidation
  • Information Services From The Edge
  • Net-Centric Capability Portfolio Management
  • Compliance Reviews (e.g. ED-NetCentric, DBSMC and
    CCA)
  • SNaP-IT/DITPR Alignment Effort
  • Performance Budget Management Indicators
  • Compliance Tracking Enforcement
  • DOD CIO Governance Structure (CIO-EB, EGB and
    C2CIB)
  • DOD Information Enterprise Architecture
    Transition Plan
  • Net Centric Portfolio CDP and CDI

7
Army LWN Governance Framework
Governance Tiers
Tier 5
Army Executive Board
Objective Establish and manage a LWN Enterprise
Governance framework to effectively deliver
relevant, interoperable and affordable capability
in support of the Army Enterprise.
ARFORGEN
Readiness
IMCOM
  • Provide strategic guidance
  • Conflict resolution
  • Establish accountability
  • Maintain situational awareness

FORSCOM
AMC
TRADOC
Strategic
Chair VCSA/AAE
CIO
BMA Executive Board
Tier 4
Business Processes
Operational
Technology
Enterprise Process Owners Council (EPOC)
Enterprise Guidance Board
LWN/BC Decision Forum
Tier 3
Technology Enterprise Architecture
Decisions
Operational
Capability Set Management Board (CSMB)
Council of Colonels LWN/BC
Tier 2
Capability Development Processes
G3/5/7 TRADOC
CIO/G6 TRADOC
DUSA/CIO/G6
Battle Command Segment
Generating Force Enterprise Activity Segment
Network Segment
Tier 1
Tactical
Sub-Segments
Sub-Segments
Sub-Segments
Tier 0
8
CIO / G-6 IT Governance - Process View
OPERATING / GENERATING FORCE
CAPABILITY SET-BASED REQUIREMENTS
CAPABILITY SET-BASED REQUIREMENTS
IT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
  • SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
  • Enterprise Guidance Board
  • Senior IT decision forum
  • Alignment of IT to Army priorities
  • Ensure IT financial transparency
  • Compliance Enforcement
  • GNEC CoC
  • EGB CoC
  • GNEC IMS Oversight
  • Adjudicate escalate

GOVERNANCE COMPLIANCE
PLAN
MEASURE
  • SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
  • ARMY ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD
    (Notional)

SERVICE MANAGEMENT
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
  • SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
  • OPERATIONS OVERSIGHT BOARD
  • ENGINEERING REVIEW BOARD

CIO / G-6
  • Oversee Enterprise IT Architecture
  • Approve AEA policy and standards
  • Adjudicate non-standard requirements
  • Integrate across architectural domains
  • IT Service Management oversight
  • SLA Service catalog oversight
  • Engineering standards

INTEGRATE
TECHNOLOGY DOMAINS
IT SERVICES
IT SOLUTIONS
TECHNOLOGY DOMAINS
Army Capability SETS
9
Governance Boards Forums
10
Actions To Date
  • EGB Actions and Tiger Teams
  • Status of Operations Oversight and Engineering
    Review Boards
  • Transformation Process Integration
  • Wikis, Blogs, and Knowledge Centers
  • Governance Workshops

11
In Summary
The Armys Enterprise IT Governance is an
on-going effort and will take several years to
reach full maturity. To keep abreast of all our
activities and accomplishments, please visit our
wiki at https//www.intelink.gov/wiki/Army_CIO_G
6_GOVERNANCE
12
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
QUESTIONS?
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
13
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
BACKUP
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
14
BRAC Use Case Assumptions
  • Impacted organizations provide the DOIM their
    individual 1-n requirements
  • G-3/5/7 validated Capabilities List exists for
    authorized services / capabilities
  • BRAC IT Office acts as the CIO/G-6s advocate in
    synchronizes and reconciles services requirements
    and new IT capabilities.
  • Impacted organization in conjunction with BRAC IT
    Office submit Waiver Request, e.g. Goal 1 Waiver
  • Normalized IT Requirements Have been vetted
    against Services List and organized to identify 1
    Common services being used by everyone, 2
    Exceptions to common service usage, e.g. JWICS, 3
    Common and unique applications, and 4 New
    valid requirements
  • IT Portfolio Management and Army Enterprise
    Architecture related Courses of Action (COA) are
    performed by the CIO/G-6.
  • Signoffs will be required by CIO/G-6, impacted
    ACOM, and BRAC IT Office before plan is approved
    by BRAC Office (ACSIM)
  • BRAC Office is responsible for all communications
    to all stakeholders throughout the planning and
    execution lifecycle.
  • Unplanned funding requiring escalation will need
    review by BRP CoC.

15
BRAC IT Support Stakeholders
16
BRAC IT Support Stakeholders
17
Site Assessment Working Group (SAWG)
Each Army Installation impacted by BRAC will
establish a Site Assessment Working Group (SAWG).
The SAWG is to evaluate all existing IT
shortfalls, Installation IT initiatives (e.g.,
I3MP, Single DOIM), and other Stationing actions
that include Grow the Army, Global Defense
Posture Realignment, etc. when evaluating BRAC IT
requirements. The primary deliverable of the SAWG
will be a consolidated and prioritized 1-n
listing of all BRAC and non-BRAC IT requirements
impacting the Installation. The SAWG memberships
consists of the following
  • The Senior Commander (SC) of Impacted
    Installation (Chair)
  • 7th Signal Command representative
  • DOIM
  • Impacted tenants
  • DPW
  • BRAC IT Office (ISEC)
  • PM NSC
  • Representatives from HQDA

MCA_BRAC Annex - Military Construction Army
(MCA) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 05
IT Requirements (DRAFT)
18
IT BRAC Process Map SAMPLE Use
CaseRequirements ? Planning
19
Definition and Objectives of Governance
  • Governance is knowing who makes decisions and who
    gets to provide input before the decision is made
    gt Sharing power and influencing behavior.
  • and
  • Management is accountable for the execution of
    decisions made by the governance process.
  • Requirements for good decisions
  • Right people have the right information
  • Right people have right level of responsibility
    and accountability
  • Effective Governance occurs when
  • Decision-making process is defined
  • Each organization in the decision-making process
    has a clearly defined role and has what they need
    (authority and information) to make the decisions
    assigned to them
  • Each organization in the decision-making process
    knows what theyre responsible for doing and
    accountability metrics (feedback) mechanism is
    clear
  • In short, everyone is clear on how they can
    affect what affects them

Governance is decisions, management is execution
20
Goal and Objectives of IT Governance
  • Goal To establish a decision-enabling framework
    that directs and controls enterprise IT and
    assigns accountability, to support the Army
    mission
  • Objectives
  • Develop an Integrated IT Governance Framework
  • Adopt Performance Metrics
  • Establish Enforceable Policies
  • Monitor and Enforce Compliance
  • Communicate the Strategies and Policies

Transforming and integrating IT into the Army
enterprise
21
Armys Governance Model
Secretary of the Army
Chief of Staff of the Army
Army Enterprise Board
Chief, NGB (as required)
PPBE
HQDA (Secretariat ARSTAF)
Assessment
Future Requirements
Policy Formulation
Trained and Ready Forces for the Combatant
Commanders
Strategy Development
Acquisition
Oversight
Objective Effective Delivery of Outcomes
Readiness
CE Core Enterprise
22
IT Governance Enablers
  • IT Portfolio Management - Align IT solution sets
    with capability set requirements
  • Service Management - Deliver core service
    capabilities that are strategically aligned and
    successfully impact on mission effectiveness
  • Enterprise Architecture - Develop and manage the
    big IT picture through effective technology
    planning
  • Performance Management Measure performance
    execution
  • Governance Office Monitor and oversee process
    execution
  • Decision Forums Prioritize, adjudicate and
    escalate

Mature processes enable good decisions
23
Tiered Decision Approach
A multi-tier decision model is recommended to
institutionalize the Armys IT governance to
ensure that 1) transparency of IT assets and
associated cost, 2) effective leveraging of IT
capabilities, and 3) opened and consistent
communications Army-wide.
Oversight
Goals
Scope
Involves
  • Communicate the strategic alignment and
    integration of IT with the Army planning
    processes
  • Ensure cooperation of federated IT activities
    throughout the enterprise
  • Enterprise strategic vision
  • Comprehensive IT / Business strategy

IT Strategy
  • Army CIO, BRP, AEB
  • Ensure that IT initiatives are aligned to Army
    priorities and capability sets
  • Ensure IT assets are identified and properly
    vetted against bona fide requirements.
  • Resolve resource and priority conflicts
  • Risk mitigation oversight
  • IT Assets (networks, platforms, applications,
    systems, etc)
  • IT Programs / Projects
  • EGB-
  • CSMB
  • Acquisition Managers

Portfolio Management
  • AEA, ERB, SOS SE
  • Senior IT technical representatives
  • Oversee and adopt revisions to Enterprise
    Architecture
  • Incorporate new or changed standards, evaluate
    new technologies, and realign with changing
    business priorities
  • Provide adjudication of non-standard requirements
  • Business Architecture
  • Applications Architecture
  • Data Architecture
  • Technology Architecture
  • IT Services

Enterprise Architecture
  • Ensure interoperation between all IT enterprise
    capabilities and environments
  • Oversee IT shared services, support to data
    sharing of data, transactional capabilities and
    the efficient operation of cross-functional and
    cross-organizational processes.
  • Risk mitigation oversight
  • Datacenters
  • Networks
  • Applications
  • Databases
  • Seat Management
  • OOB , Relationship Managers
  • Senior IT technical representatives

Service Management
  • ASCC
  • DRU
  • CIO/G6
  • ACOM

24
Current Maturity State of IT Governance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com