Title: Army CIO Executive Board Opening Remarks
1UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
LandWarNet Conference 2009
Track 3 Army Knowledge Management
Army CIO/G-6 SAIS-GK How We Govern An Army
Enterprise in conjunction with the DoD
Enterprise Ms. Sonya Phillips, Chief Governance
Program Office
Session 3 19 Aug 2009 / 0945-1100
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
2UNCLASSIFIED
LandWarNet 2009
- PURPOSE To provide an overview of how the
Armys IT Governance framework supports DoD
capabilities - OBJECTIVES By the end of this presentation you
will - Be knowledgeable of the DOD Governance framework
- Understand how the Armys LandWarNet DoD
governance frameworks integrate - Understand the roles and responsibilities of the
Armys IT Governance forums and how decisions
are made
3Agenda
- DOD Governance Overview
- Armys LandWarNet Governance Framework
- Army Governance Boards and Forums
- Actions to Date
- Questions
4DOD Implementation and Governance
A shared vision, mission and governing principles
5DOD CIO Governance Structure
DoD CIO
DoD CIO Executive Board
- Vision high level interpretation compliance
- Top cover
- Recommends directly to the DoD CIO
- Tie breaker
- Escalated problem resolution
CIO/C4
Information Assurance Senior Leaders Chair DASD
(CIIA)
- DoD CIO vision interpretation, strategies
policies - Capability architectures approval
- Acquisition oversight (Non-MAIS MDAP)
- DBSMC Cert/IRB
- Issue adjudication
Enterprise Guidance Board Chair DoD DCIO
- IA policy and guidance
- GIAP guidance
Enterprise Operations Oversight Committee Chairs
Dir, Enterprise Operations STRATCOM Rep
Enterprise Services Review Group Chairs DISA
(PEO GES) Dir, Enterprise Svcs Integration
Technical Standards Enterprise Architecture
Review Group Chairs Dir, Enterprise
Architecture Standards DISA CSE (GES-G)
IA Enterprise Review Group Chair PD DASD CIIA
- Compliance/Enforcement of Net Ops/Operational IA
(policy, guidance) - GIG certification accreditation
- Compliance/Enforcement of sustained operations
through - - Configuration management
- - Architecture
- - GIG Waivers
- - Operational connections process
- - Test integration
- - Interoperability and supportability
- ES strategic planning, policy implementation
- Data/Service strategies coord
- Solution synchronization
- Information sharing
- Service registries
- Interoperability
- ES to tactical edge
- IA Architecture approval and engineering guidance
- IA Standards and configuration management
- Assure integration and compliance of capabilities
solutions
- Architecture approval at the enterprise level
- Manage architecture federation
- Define architecture compliance criteria
- Maintain authoritative sources of IT standards
and implementation-level specifications
6CIO Policy, Guidance, Oversight
On-Going Corresponding Army Efforts
- Unity of Command and Global Authentication
- NetOps Directive Strategic Vision
Implementation Plan - Identity Management Security Framework Tiger
Team - Active Directory Consolidation
- Joint Infrastructure and Common Standard,
Policies Procedures - Enterprise Service Designation Governance
Process Policy - Installation Common IT Catalog and Delivery Plan
- Identity Management Security Framework
- Enterprise eMail Consolidation
- Information Services From The Edge
- Net-Centric Capability Portfolio Management
- Compliance Reviews (e.g. ED-NetCentric, DBSMC and
CCA) - SNaP-IT/DITPR Alignment Effort
- Performance Budget Management Indicators
- Compliance Tracking Enforcement
- DOD CIO Governance Structure (CIO-EB, EGB and
C2CIB) - DOD Information Enterprise Architecture
Transition Plan - Net Centric Portfolio CDP and CDI
7Army LWN Governance Framework
Governance Tiers
Tier 5
Army Executive Board
Objective Establish and manage a LWN Enterprise
Governance framework to effectively deliver
relevant, interoperable and affordable capability
in support of the Army Enterprise.
ARFORGEN
Readiness
IMCOM
- Provide strategic guidance
- Conflict resolution
- Establish accountability
- Maintain situational awareness
FORSCOM
AMC
TRADOC
Strategic
Chair VCSA/AAE
CIO
BMA Executive Board
Tier 4
Business Processes
Operational
Technology
Enterprise Process Owners Council (EPOC)
Enterprise Guidance Board
LWN/BC Decision Forum
Tier 3
Technology Enterprise Architecture
Decisions
Operational
Capability Set Management Board (CSMB)
Council of Colonels LWN/BC
Tier 2
Capability Development Processes
G3/5/7 TRADOC
CIO/G6 TRADOC
DUSA/CIO/G6
Battle Command Segment
Generating Force Enterprise Activity Segment
Network Segment
Tier 1
Tactical
Sub-Segments
Sub-Segments
Sub-Segments
Tier 0
8CIO / G-6 IT Governance - Process View
OPERATING / GENERATING FORCE
CAPABILITY SET-BASED REQUIREMENTS
CAPABILITY SET-BASED REQUIREMENTS
IT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
- SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
- Enterprise Guidance Board
- Senior IT decision forum
- Alignment of IT to Army priorities
- Ensure IT financial transparency
- Compliance Enforcement
- EGB CoC
- GNEC IMS Oversight
- Adjudicate escalate
GOVERNANCE COMPLIANCE
PLAN
MEASURE
- SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
- ARMY ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW BOARD
(Notional)
SERVICE MANAGEMENT
ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
- SUPPORTING DECISION BOARD
- OPERATIONS OVERSIGHT BOARD
- ENGINEERING REVIEW BOARD
CIO / G-6
- Oversee Enterprise IT Architecture
- Approve AEA policy and standards
- Adjudicate non-standard requirements
- Integrate across architectural domains
- IT Service Management oversight
- SLA Service catalog oversight
- Engineering standards
INTEGRATE
TECHNOLOGY DOMAINS
IT SERVICES
IT SOLUTIONS
TECHNOLOGY DOMAINS
Army Capability SETS
9Governance Boards Forums
10Actions To Date
- EGB Actions and Tiger Teams
- Status of Operations Oversight and Engineering
Review Boards - Transformation Process Integration
- Wikis, Blogs, and Knowledge Centers
- Governance Workshops
11In Summary
The Armys Enterprise IT Governance is an
on-going effort and will take several years to
reach full maturity. To keep abreast of all our
activities and accomplishments, please visit our
wiki at https//www.intelink.gov/wiki/Army_CIO_G
6_GOVERNANCE
12UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
QUESTIONS?
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
13UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
BACKUP
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
14BRAC Use Case Assumptions
- Impacted organizations provide the DOIM their
individual 1-n requirements - G-3/5/7 validated Capabilities List exists for
authorized services / capabilities - BRAC IT Office acts as the CIO/G-6s advocate in
synchronizes and reconciles services requirements
and new IT capabilities. - Impacted organization in conjunction with BRAC IT
Office submit Waiver Request, e.g. Goal 1 Waiver - Normalized IT Requirements Have been vetted
against Services List and organized to identify 1
Common services being used by everyone, 2
Exceptions to common service usage, e.g. JWICS, 3
Common and unique applications, and 4 New
valid requirements - IT Portfolio Management and Army Enterprise
Architecture related Courses of Action (COA) are
performed by the CIO/G-6. - Signoffs will be required by CIO/G-6, impacted
ACOM, and BRAC IT Office before plan is approved
by BRAC Office (ACSIM) - BRAC Office is responsible for all communications
to all stakeholders throughout the planning and
execution lifecycle. - Unplanned funding requiring escalation will need
review by BRP CoC.
15BRAC IT Support Stakeholders
16BRAC IT Support Stakeholders
17Site Assessment Working Group (SAWG)
Each Army Installation impacted by BRAC will
establish a Site Assessment Working Group (SAWG).
The SAWG is to evaluate all existing IT
shortfalls, Installation IT initiatives (e.g.,
I3MP, Single DOIM), and other Stationing actions
that include Grow the Army, Global Defense
Posture Realignment, etc. when evaluating BRAC IT
requirements. The primary deliverable of the SAWG
will be a consolidated and prioritized 1-n
listing of all BRAC and non-BRAC IT requirements
impacting the Installation. The SAWG memberships
consists of the following
- The Senior Commander (SC) of Impacted
Installation (Chair) - 7th Signal Command representative
- DOIM
- Impacted tenants
- DPW
- BRAC IT Office (ISEC)
- PM NSC
- Representatives from HQDA
MCA_BRAC Annex - Military Construction Army
(MCA) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 05
IT Requirements (DRAFT)
18IT BRAC Process Map SAMPLE Use
CaseRequirements ? Planning
19Definition and Objectives of Governance
- Governance is knowing who makes decisions and who
gets to provide input before the decision is made
gt Sharing power and influencing behavior. - and
- Management is accountable for the execution of
decisions made by the governance process. - Requirements for good decisions
- Right people have the right information
- Right people have right level of responsibility
and accountability
- Effective Governance occurs when
- Decision-making process is defined
- Each organization in the decision-making process
has a clearly defined role and has what they need
(authority and information) to make the decisions
assigned to them - Each organization in the decision-making process
knows what theyre responsible for doing and
accountability metrics (feedback) mechanism is
clear - In short, everyone is clear on how they can
affect what affects them
Governance is decisions, management is execution
20Goal and Objectives of IT Governance
- Goal To establish a decision-enabling framework
that directs and controls enterprise IT and
assigns accountability, to support the Army
mission - Objectives
- Develop an Integrated IT Governance Framework
- Adopt Performance Metrics
- Establish Enforceable Policies
- Monitor and Enforce Compliance
- Communicate the Strategies and Policies
Transforming and integrating IT into the Army
enterprise
21Armys Governance Model
Secretary of the Army
Chief of Staff of the Army
Army Enterprise Board
Chief, NGB (as required)
PPBE
HQDA (Secretariat ARSTAF)
Assessment
Future Requirements
Policy Formulation
Trained and Ready Forces for the Combatant
Commanders
Strategy Development
Acquisition
Oversight
Objective Effective Delivery of Outcomes
Readiness
CE Core Enterprise
22IT Governance Enablers
- IT Portfolio Management - Align IT solution sets
with capability set requirements - Service Management - Deliver core service
capabilities that are strategically aligned and
successfully impact on mission effectiveness - Enterprise Architecture - Develop and manage the
big IT picture through effective technology
planning - Performance Management Measure performance
execution - Governance Office Monitor and oversee process
execution - Decision Forums Prioritize, adjudicate and
escalate
Mature processes enable good decisions
23Tiered Decision Approach
A multi-tier decision model is recommended to
institutionalize the Armys IT governance to
ensure that 1) transparency of IT assets and
associated cost, 2) effective leveraging of IT
capabilities, and 3) opened and consistent
communications Army-wide.
Oversight
Goals
Scope
Involves
- Communicate the strategic alignment and
integration of IT with the Army planning
processes - Ensure cooperation of federated IT activities
throughout the enterprise
- Enterprise strategic vision
- Comprehensive IT / Business strategy
IT Strategy
- Ensure that IT initiatives are aligned to Army
priorities and capability sets - Ensure IT assets are identified and properly
vetted against bona fide requirements. - Resolve resource and priority conflicts
- Risk mitigation oversight
- IT Assets (networks, platforms, applications,
systems, etc) - IT Programs / Projects
- EGB-
- CSMB
- Acquisition Managers
Portfolio Management
- AEA, ERB, SOS SE
- Senior IT technical representatives
- Oversee and adopt revisions to Enterprise
Architecture - Incorporate new or changed standards, evaluate
new technologies, and realign with changing
business priorities - Provide adjudication of non-standard requirements
- Business Architecture
- Applications Architecture
- Data Architecture
- Technology Architecture
- IT Services
Enterprise Architecture
- Ensure interoperation between all IT enterprise
capabilities and environments - Oversee IT shared services, support to data
sharing of data, transactional capabilities and
the efficient operation of cross-functional and
cross-organizational processes. - Risk mitigation oversight
- Datacenters
- Networks
- Applications
- Databases
- Seat Management
- OOB , Relationship Managers
- Senior IT technical representatives
Service Management
24Current Maturity State of IT Governance