Title: South Carolina
1South Carolina Sentencing Reform Commission Data-D
riven Decision Making
John Speir, Ph.D. Applied Research Services, Inc.
2Presentation Objectives
- Sentence Reform Goals 2001 Commission
- Understanding Prison Population Dynamics
- Population Drivers Preliminary Look at
Pre-Conviction Data
3Presentation Objectives
- What is Evidence-based reform?
- Simple Theory vs. Hard Reality
- Reform vs. Statutory Tinkering
- What Data Will We Examine?
- Testing our Proposals?
- Reform without Guidelines as a Goal?
4Selected 2001 Guideline Goals
- Discretion, fairness, and consistency
- Management tool to better predict plan
correctional growth - Encourage intermediate sanctions
5Just Understand the Buckets
Do Not Fill Above Line
County Jails
DOC Intake
Diversion
Solicitors
State Prisons
Pre-Release
Earned Credits
Parole
Courtesy Tim Carr
6Sentence Reform Looks Easy In Theory
Population Drivers
- Demographics/Structural Factors
- Crime Arrest Trends
- Filings/Convictions
- Admissions New Court/ Revocations
- Length-of-Stay
Prison Population
7Not Easy In Reality
SentencingPractices
Sentencing Reform Policies
Crime Arrests Convictions
Prison Population
Adapted from Wicharaya (1995)
8Review of Population Drivers
- State Demographics/Social Structural
- Crime Arrest Trends
- Criminal Filings/Convictions
9Review of Population Drivers
- Admissions New Court Revocations
- Length-of-Stay
- Correctional Alternatives Turned into Supplements
- Unexpected System Response
10State Census Projections
- State Demographics
- Crime Arrest Trends
- Criminal Filings/Convictions
11Census Projections 2009-2015
Change Age Groups 17-24
25-30 SC -2 4 GA
4 6 NC 7
15 US -3 6
Exercise caution using Projections in 2000 which
are based on 2000 Census U.S. Census never
released the final projections in 2005 Next
Census Projections Not Expected Until 2014
12Violent Crime and Incarceration Rate
Violent Crime Rate
Incarceration Rate
13UCR Violent Crime Rate vs. Correctional
Population Rates (per 100,000 pop)
1200
Violent Crime
900
Incarceration Rate
600
Admission Rate
300
0
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
2003
2007
14 Problem with Rates We Do Not Incarcerate
Rates But People
15Correctional Population
Total Inmate Pop
13 Since 2000
Admissions
26 Since 2000
8
16Filings, Dispositions, And Pending
Change 2000-07 Filings
16 Dispositions 5 Pending
41
Source Judicial Department
17Percent Convictions ()
No Significant Change Over Last 5 years
(40 to 42)
Source Judicial Department
18Understanding the Drop in Crime No Silver Bullets
- Age-out of Baby Boomers
- Abatement of the crack epidemic in late
1980s-early 1990s - Increased incapacitation
- Police strategies
- Domestic Violence prevention programs
on-the-spot arrest policies
19Understanding the Drop in Crime
- Economic Conditions and Low Unemployment
20 The goal is manage the prison population
rather than it managing the State
21 Convicted Offenders Fall into 3 Basic Groups
?
Absolutely Prison
No Prison
Offense Offender Severity
22Admission and Length-of-Stay
Prison Admissions X Length-of-Stay
Prison Population
23Alternatives to Incarceration or Correctional
Supplements?
Prison Admissions
Court Imposed Sentences
New Program Alternative
Expensive Probation Not True Diversion Potential
Prison Accelerant
Probation Admissions
24 What is Evidence-Based Reform How We Do It?
25Evidence.
- Use the best available data
- Use tools to project possible impact and
unanticipated consequences - Avoid emotion and wait until the data are
presented - Weigh the data against SRC goals.
26Simulation
- Can describe analyze the behavior of a system
- Can answer what if questions
- Eliminates the emotion in decision-making
27Do We Have the Right Data?
- Department of Corrections 5 Years of Admissions,
Active, and Release Population - Probation, Parole, and Pardons Admissions,
Revocations, and Parole Hearing Outcomes - Judicial Department 10-Years Indictments and
Dispositions
28 Commission Data?
- SLED/Budget Control Board Computerized Criminal
History (CCH)- rapsheet repository - Statistical Analysis Center (SAC)
- National Incident-based Reporting System
29Tools Simulating the Potential Impact
Imitate the operation of a real world system
over time. Jerry Banks, 1998. The Handbook of
Simulation.
30Defining a Projected Impact
Designed not to predict what will happenbut
rather explore what would happen if assumptions
unfold in different ways.. Donella Meadows
Thinking in Systems A Primer, 2008
31Simulation
- Can test every aspect of a proposed change
without committing resources - Can explore new policies or operating procedures
without the expense disruption of experimenting
on the real system
32Demonstration
33Concepts Ideas Other States
34Admissions Front-End
- Alternatives to incarceration based on best
practices - Risk Assessment worksheets for alternative
placement (additional offender information) - Bench book (electronic) to provide summary of
statewide practices in similarly situated cases
(advisory only) - Revise statutory eligibility criteria
35Admissions Front-End
- Statutory revisions limiting prison as an option
- Statutory prohibition against prison for
probation/technical violators - Pre-adjudication alternatives coupled with
rehabilitative obligations
36Length-of-Stay Front-End
- Offense reclassification
- Redefine violent offense
- Bench book (electronic) to provide summary of
statewide practices in similarly situated cases
(advisory only) - Statutory revisions limiting maximum prison term
(or reclassification)
37Length-of-Stay Back-End (Prison Release
Mechanisms)
- Parole release decision-making
- Objective parole release guidelines
- Short-term incarceration with intermediate
sanctions to follow (target inmates with longer
prison terms) - Different earned time credits for different
inmate classes - Statutory revisions limiting maximum prison term
38Admissions Back-End
- Sentence Conversions following DOC classification
39Discussion
40Visit our web site at www.ars-corp.com or
call (404) 881-1120