FDD for Rooftop Air Conditioning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

FDD for Rooftop Air Conditioning

Description:

FDD for Rooftop Air Conditioning – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jimb96
Category:
Tags: fdd | air | conditioning | rooftop | zel

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FDD for Rooftop Air Conditioning


1

Introduction to Load Shifting and Peak Load
Reduction using Building Thermal Mass
Jim Braun Purdue University
2
Outline
  • Building Thermal Mass Concept
  • Strategy Development and Evaluation
  • Previous Work
  • Objectives of Current Work

3
Control of Building Thermal Mass
  • Precool at night during off-peak hours
  • Adjust daytime setpoints to control discharge
  • Cooled structure reduces daytime, on-peak cooling
    loads
  • Savings due to
  • reduced on-peak energy and demand usage
  • improved equipment performance
  • night ventilation

4
Building Structural Storage Potential
Internal Gains 4 - 8 Watts/sq. ft.
Thermal Capacity 2 - 4 Watts-Hours/sq. ft. -
F
Concrete Floor
0.25 - 1 hours of storage per 1 degree F
temperature change
5
Types of Strategies
6
Load Effects
Cooling Loads
On-Peak Period
Unoccupied Period
Occupied Period
Time of Day
7
Thermal Mass vs. Ice Storage
  • No additional costs (Structure already exists!!)
  • Charging constraints due to occupant comfort
  • Variable storage efficiency due to coupling
    between building and environment
  • Initial cost associated with ice tank(s), piping,
    support equipment, installation.
  • No direct comfort constraints
  • Constant storage efficiency with easily
    determined state of charge

8
Strategy Development and Evaluation
Laboratory Testing
Simulation
Controlled Testing Validate Simulations
Demonstrate Savings
Evaluate Maximum Savings Potential
Develop and Evaluate Generic Control Strategies
Field Testing
A Tool to Develop Site-Specific Control Strategies
Implementation Issues
A Tool to Evaluate Field Savings
Evaluate Real-World Savings Potential
9
Forward Simulation
use to evaluate savings potential develop
simple control strategies
10
Inverse Simulation
use to develop site-specific control
strategies evaluate field savings
11
Previous Studies
  • Simulation Work
  • Up to 30 HVAC energy demand cost savings for
    large commercial buildings (Braun (1990), Synder
    and Newell (1990), Rabl and Norford (1991),
    Andresen and Brandemuehl (1992))
  • Cost savings very sensitive to control method,
    system parameters, utility rates, and weather
  • Inverse modeling approach for developing and
    evaluating site-specific control strategies
    (Chaturvedi and Braun, 2002)
  • Laboratory Testing
  • Up to 50 load shifting peak reduction for a
    lightweight internal zone (Conniff (1991), Morris
    et. al (1994))
  • Good agreement between measured loads and load
    predictions from TRNSYS building model (Morris
    et. al (1994))
  • Load shifting and peak load reduction very
    sensitive to control strategy

12
Previous Studies
  • Field Testing Large Commercial Buildings
  • Small load shifting and peak reduction reported
    by Ruud et al. (1990)
  • 100 shedding from 2 pm to 630 pm reported by
    Sukkhbir et al. (1993)
  • 25 peak cooling load reduction for side-by-side
    tests from 7 am to 6 pm reported by Keeney and
    Braun (1996)
  • Up to 40 HVAC cost savings predicted for large
    commercial building by Braun et. al (2002)
  • Field Testing Small Commercial Buildings
  • 23 load shifting for small commercial building
    reported Braun et. al (2002)

13
Simulated Load Shifting Cost Savings (2-to-1
time-of-day rates)
high sensitivity to building and plant
Heavy Zone Good Part-Load
Daily Cooling Cost Savings
Heavy Zone Flat Part-Load
Light Zone Flat Part-Load
Light Zone Bad Part-Load
Average Daily Temperature (F)
14
NIST Laboratory Test Facility
Controlled to emulate internal zone within a
multi-story building
15
Demand-Limiting Test Results
16
Comfort Results Demand Limiting
17
Chicago Field Site Description
1.4 million sq. ft., four 900-ton chillers, west
of Chicago 0.052/kw-hr on-peak (9 am 10
pm) 0.023/kw-hr off-peak, 16.41 per peak kW
18
Chicago Field Site
19
Demand-Limiting Case Study
20
HVAC Energy Cost Case Study
  • Created an inverse model from measured data
  • Used model to develop evaluate control
    strategies

21
Model Validation(HVAC utility costs, July 11 -
August 8, 1997, field site data)
5 difference in utility costs
22
3-Month Cost Savings for HVAC
23
Objectives of Current Work
  • Demonstrate peak load reduction potential in a
    medium size commercial building
  • Further develop and validate inverse modeling
    tools
  • a tool for developing site-specific strategies
    and evaluating field site savings
  • Evaluate peak load reduction potential for a
    small commercial building
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com