Diagnostics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnostics

Description:

Yiping Feng DCO Lead Scientist. Eliazar Ortiz DCO Lead Engineer ... YAG:Ce screen. Diode Assy. 45 mirror. Brazed chamber. 6 DOF Stand. Motorized zoom lens ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: wwwssrlSl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnostics


1
Diagnostics Common Optics LUSI WBS 1.5
  • Yiping Feng DCO Lead Scientist
  • Eliazar Ortiz DCO Lead Engineer
  • DCO Engineering Staff
  • June 03, 2009

2
Acknowledgment
  • DCO Engineering Staff
  • Tim Montagne
  • Profile/wavefront monitor
  • Intensity monitor
  • Intensity-position monitor
  • Harmonic rejection mirror
  • Marc Campell
  • Attenuator
  • X-ray focusing lens
  • Richard Jackson
  • Slits system
  • Pulse picker

3
Outline
  • Distribution
  • Diagnostics Status
  • Profile Monitor
  • Profile-Intensity Monitor
  • Intensity-Position Monitor
  • Common Optics Status
  • Slits
  • Attenuator Pulse Picker
  • X-Ray Focusing Lens
  • Cost Schedule
  • Summary

4
Components Distribution
  • Components locations
  • Distributed throughout the XPP, CXI, and XCS
    instruments, including X-ray transport tunnel

MEE
CXI Endstation
X-ray Transport Tunnel
XCS Endstation
Near Experimental Hall
XPP Endstation
Far Experimental Hall
LCLS X-ray FEL
SXR
AMO
5
Components Distribution
6
DCO Distribution on CXI
  • CXI Instrument

Intensity-position
Intensity/ profile
Intensity-position
Profile/ Intensity
Intensity-position
wavefront
Not shown are attenuator, pulse picker situated
in X-ray transport
Slits
Slits
Slits
Slits
There are 15 diagnostics/common optics
components in CXI
7
Diagnostics Status
  • Profile Intensity Monitor Status
  • PM and IM collocated in same chamber when
    applicable
  • FDR completed April 2009
  • Commonality for all Monitors
  • Chamber
  • 6 DOF Alignment Stands
  • Stages
  • Same design for wavefront monitor
  • w/o intensity monitor
  • Attenuation needed

8
Diagnostics Status
  • Profile Intensity Monitor Next Steps
  • Place orders for vendor items- Started April 09
  • Place order for fabricated components June 09
  • Test First Articles- July 09
  • Update Models and Drawings based on First Article
    tests- August 09
  • Order production chamber assembliesDetail Design
    PM and PIMAug 09

9
Diagnostics Status
  • Intensity-Position Monitor
  • FDR completed April 2009
  • Commonality for all Monitors
  • Chamber
  • 6 DOF Alignment Stands
  • Stages

4-channel Diode Electronics (Charge sensitive
amplification)
Hollow shaft for cable routing
Be target changer
100 mm travel linear stages with smart motor
Roller Stages
Smart Motor for X-axis motion
LCLS Beam
Be targets
4-Diode Assy. (inclined in y for uniform response)
Brazed chamber
6 DOF Stand
IPM needs calibration in both x y directions
10
Diagnostics Status
  • Intensity-Position Monitor Next Steps
  • Place orders for vendor items- Started April 09
  • Place order for fabricated components June 09
  • Test First Articles- July 09
  • Update Models and Drawings based on First Article
    tests- August 09
  • Order production chamber assembliesDetail Design
    PM and PIMAug 09

11
Common Optics
Double blades configuration (4 sets of blades)
  • Slits System
  • UHV compatible
  • Low-z high-z blades
  • Single/Double configurations

High-Z
Low-Z
Pink beam
Single blades configuration (2 sets of blades)
Blades/ blade mounts
High-Z
Mono beam
Rigid Stand w/o DOF
Optical encoder
Blade Form Factor
12
Common Optics Status
  • Slits Status
  • Purchase Item
  • Vendor Evaluation in Process
  • Confirmed compatibility with controls
  • Added to APP in January
  • Performance data from vendor March 09
  • Coupling for double assembly configuration will
    be done at SLAC.
  • Coupler has been identified
  • One has been ordered and received

13
Common Optics Status
  • Slits Next Steps
  • Secure additional funding- June 09
  • Award Contract June 09
  • Order Supports June 09
  • Detail Assembly Drawings June 09

14
Common Optics Status
  • Attenuator-Pulse Picker Status
  • Combined attenuator and pulse picker
  • Commercial pulse-picker packaged into same
    chamber
  • Final Design Review Completed
  • Chamber shared with Attenuator
  • Test Program
  • Blade coating
  • PP performance with coated blade
  • Shared Design
  • 6 DOF Alignment Stands
  • Stage

15
Common Optics Status
  • Attenuator-Pulse PickerNext Steps
  • Finalize Blade coating test June 09
  • Order Supports Design Feb 09
  • Place orders for vendor items- June 09
  • Linear stage
  • Motors
  • Actuators
  • Place Order for fabricated Items- June 09
  • Chamber
  • Stage support bracket
  • Mirror Filter holders
  • Shaft Weldment

16
Common Optics Status
  • X-Ray Focusing Lenses Status
  • Commonality with Monitors
  • Chamber
  • 6 DOF Alignment Stands
  • Stages
  • Final Design Review- June 09

17
Common Optics Status
  • X-Ray Focusing Lenses Next Steps
  • Order lens holder parts for validation test- May
    09
  • Issue award for lenses- July 09
  • Order other vendor Items- July 09
  • Linear Stages
  • Motors

18
Cost
36
64
19
Cost Schedule Performance WBS 1.5
20
Project Critical Path
  • DCO has one design effort and multiple
    procurements to support the Instrument
    requirements.
  • The project is monitoring strings of activities
    with the least float
  • Items on the critical path are
  • XFLS Procurement Preps (14 day float, start May
    2010)
  • HRM Procurement Preps (19 day float, start Oct
    2010)
  • Activities to monitor from falling on the
    critical path
  • Check and Approve Dwgs PP (24 day float, start
    May 09)
  • PP procurement preps XPP (24 day float, start
    June 09)

21
Major Milestones
22
Procurement Schedule
23
Summary
  • Scope of DCO components for XPP, CXI, and XCS
    instruments has not changed significantly since
    CD-02
  • The design of key diagnostics devices and optical
    components is mature and based on proven
    developments
  • at synchrotron sources worldwide
  • by XTOD and LCLS e-beam groups
  • No major risks associated with the design or
    procurement of the DCO components
  • Bought components (slits) are off the shelf
    items
  • Assembly components (CCD cameras, zoom lens,
    actuators, connectors) are commercially made with
    known performance
  • In-house electronics design are based on proven
    technology and implementations
  • DCO overall cost and schedule performance is kept
    within margins.
  • Critical Path is defined and monitored
  • Advanced Procurements identified
  • DCO is on track to support accelerated schedule!

24
Backup
25
Overview
  • DCO will provide to all LUSI instruments
  • Common diagnostics for measuring FEL properties
  • Transverse beam profile
  • Incident beam intensity
  • Beam positions and pointing
  • Wavefield measurement at focus
  • Common Optical components for performing FEL
    manipulations
  • Beam size definition and clean-up
  • Attenuation
  • Pulse pattern selection and/or repetition rate
    reduction
  • Isolation of fundamental from high order
    harmonics
  • Focusing
  • Monochromatization

Engineering of mono is now managed by the XCS
team
26
DCO CD-2 Scope
  • DCO suites

Engineering of mono is now managed by the XCS
team
27
Global Physics Requirements
  • Physics requirements remained same as CD-2 and
    were based on characteristics of LCLS FEL
  • Ultra short pulses 100 fs, and rep. rate of 120
    Hz
  • Pulse energy 2 mJ, peak power 20 GW, ave. power
    .24 W
  • Fully coherent in transverse directions
    expected to be predominantly TEM00
  • Exhibiting intrinsic intensity, temporal,
    spatial, timing fluctuations on per-pulse basis,
    i.e.,
  • Higher order Laguerre-Gaussian modes possible but
    negligible
  • FEL amplification process based on SASE from
    noise

28
Challenges Addressed
  • Scientific/technical challenges that were
    addressed
  • Sustaining the instantaneous LCLS X-ray FEL peak
    power
  • Exercising careful material selection
  • Filters, scattering target, slits materials,
    focusing lens, beam stop etc.
  • Based on thermal calculations including melting
    threshold and onset of thermal fatigue limited
    experimental data from FLASH
  • But no active cooling necessary
  • Providing coherent beam manipulation
  • Minimizing wavefront distortion/coherence
    degradation
  • Filters, scattering target, slits, focusing lens
  • Reducing surface roughness and bulk
    non-uniformities
  • Minimizing diffraction effects
  • i.e., utilizing cylindrical blades for slits

29
Challenges Addressed
  • Scientific/technical challenges that were
    addressed
  • Detecting ultra-fast signals
  • Extracting electrical signals in ns to minimize
    dark current contribution
  • i.e., charge-sensitive detection using diodes
  • Making per-pulse measurement if required
  • Each pulse is different
  • Averaging over pulses may NOT be an option,
    requiring sufficiently high S/N ratio for each
    pulse
  • i.e., high-precision intensity measurements at lt
    0.1 based on single pulses, requiring larger raw
    signal than synchrotron cases

30
Pop-in Profile Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1)
  • Purposes
  • Aid in alignment of X-ray optics
  • FEL is serial operation, automation enables
    maximum productivity
  • Characterization of X-ray beam spatial profile
  • FEL spatial mode structure
  • Effects of optics on fully coherent FEL beam
  • Characterization of X-ray beam transverse spatial
    jitter
  • FEL beam exhibits intrinsic spatial fluctuations
  • Implementation
  • X-ray scintillation
  • 50-75 mm thin YAGCe single crystal scintillator
  • Optical imaging
  • Capable of diffraction limited resolution if
    required
  • Normal incidence geometry w/ 45º mirror
  • Motorized zoom lens
  • 120 Hz optical CCD camera
  • Requirements
  • Destructive Retractable
  • Variable FOV and resolution
  • At 50 mm resolution, 12x12 mm2 FOV
  • At 4 mm resolution, 1x1 mm2 FOV
  • Capable of per-pulse op. _at_ 120 Hz if required
  • Attenuation used if necessary

31
Pop-in Intensity Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.2)
  • Purposes
  • Aid in alignment of X-ray optics
  • FEL is serial operation, automation enables
    maximum productivity
  • Simple point detector for physics measurements
  • In cases where 2D X-ray detector is not suitable
  • Implementation
  • Direct X-ray detection using Si diodes
  • Advantageous in cases of working w/ spontaneous
    or mono beams
  • Capable of high quantum efficiency (gt 90 at 8.3
    keV)
  • 100 500 mm depletion thickness
  • Using charge sensitive amplification
  • Applicable to pulsed FEL
  • Commercially available
  • Large working area (catch-all) easily available
    simplifying alignment procedure
  • Requirements
  • Destructive Retractable
  • Relative accuracy lt 1
  • Working dynamic range 100
  • Large sensor area 20x20 mm2
  • Per-pulse op. _at_ 120 Hz
  • Attenuation used if necessary

32
Intensity-Position Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.3)
  • Purposes
  • Allow precise measurement of the intensity for
    normalization
  • Critical to experiments where signal from
    underlying physics is very small
  • Characterization of FEL fluctuations
  • Positional jitter 10 of beam size
  • Pointing jitter 10 of beam divergence
  • Slitting beam down creates diffraction which may
    cause undesirable effects
  • Implementation
  • Based on back scattering from thin-foil
  • Detecting both Compton scattering Thomson
    scattering
  • Using Low-z (beryllium) for low attenuation
    especially at low X-ray energies
  • Using Si diode detectors
  • Array sensors for position measurement
  • Pointing measurement using 2 or more monitors
  • Requirements
  • In-situ, retractable if necessary
  • Highly transmissive (gt 95)
  • Relative accuracy lt 0.1
  • Working dynamic range 1000
  • Position accuracy in xy lt 10 mm
  • Per-pulse op. at 120 Hz

33
Wavefront Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1)in lieu of
wavefront sensor
  • Purposes
  • Wavefront characterization of focused X-ray beam
    at focal point
  • Wavefront measurement at focal point is not
    feasible by conventional methods due to damages
  • Providing supplemental scattering data in low Q
    w/ high resolution
  • Resolution obtained using X-ray direct detection
    is limited by detector technology, i.e., pixel
    sizes and per-pixel dynamic range
  • Implementation
  • X-ray scintillation
  • 50-75 mm thin YAGCe single crystal scintillator
  • Optical imaging
  • Capable of diffraction limited resolution if
    required
  • Using computational algorithm for reconstruction
    of wavefield at focus
  • Iterative, post processing only if no large
    computer farm
  • Requirements
  • In-situ Retractable
  • Variable FOV and resolution
  • At 50 mm resolution,12x12 mm2 FOV
  • At 4 mm resolution, 1x1 mm2 FOV
  • Per-pulse op. _at_ 120 Hz
  • Attenuation used if necessary

34
X-ray Focusing Lenses (WBS 1.5.3.2)
  • Purposes
  • Increase the X-ray fluence at the sample
  • Produce small spot size in cases where slits do
    not work due to diffraction,
  • i.e., sample too far from slits
  • Implementation
  • Based on refractive lenses concept
  • Concave shape due to X-ray refractive index
    1-dib
  • Using Beryllium to minimize attenuation
  • In-line focus
  • Simpler than KB systems
  • no diff. orders as in Fresnel lens
  • Chromatic
  • Con re-positioning of focal point
  • Pro Providing harmonic isolation if aperture
    used
  • Some attenuation at very low X-ray energies 2
    keV
  • Requirements
  • Produce variable spot size
  • For XPP instrument
  • 2-10 mm in focus
  • 40-60 mm out-of-focus
  • Minimize wavefront distortion and coherence
    degradation
  • Withstand FEL full flux

B. Lengeler, et al, J. Synchrotron Rad. (1999).
6, 1153-1167
35
Slits System (WBS 1.5.3.3)
  • Purposes
  • define beam transverse sizes
  • Pink and mono beam
  • Clean up scatterings (halo) around beam perimeter
  • Implementation
  • Based on cylindrical blades concept
  • Minimize scattering from edges and external total
    reflections
  • Offset in Z to allow fully closing
  • Using single or double configurations for pink or
    mono beam applications
  • Single configuration
  • Blade material Si3N4 to stop low energies
  • Or blade material Ta/W alloy to stop low fluence
    low or high energies
  • Double configuration
  • 1st blades Si3N4, 2nd blades Ta/W alloy to stop
    low and high energies
  • Requirements
  • Repeatability in xy lt 2 mm
  • 0 10 mm gap setting
  • 10-9 in transmission from 2-8.3keV
  • 10-8 in transmission at 25 keV
  • Minimize diffraction/wavefront distortion
  • Withstand FEL full flux

D. Le Bolloch, et al, J. Synchrotron Rad.
(2002). 9, 258-265
36
Attenuator/Filters (WBS 1.5.3.4)
  • Purposes
  • Reduce incident X-ray flux
  • Sample damage
  • Detector saturation
  • Diagnostic saturation
  • Alignment of optics and diagnostics
  • Implementation
  • Using Si wafers of various thicknesses
  • Highly polished to minimize wavefront distortion
    coherence degradation
  • For a given attenuation, use one wafer whenever
    possible
  • Commercially available (lt 1 nm rms roughness)
  • For energies lt 6 keV in NEH-3 and in pink beam
  • Employing a pre-attenuator, i.e., LCLS XTOD
    gas/solid attenuators
  • Requirements
  • 108 attenuation at 8.3 keV
  • 104 attenuation at 24.9 keV
  • 3 steps per decade for gt 6 keV
  • Minimize wavefront distortion and coherence
    degradation
  • Withstand unfocused flux

37
Pulse Picker (WBS 1.5.3.5)
  • Purposes
  • Select a single pulse or any sequence of pulses
  • Reduce LCLS repetition rate
  • Important if longer sample recover time is needed
  • Damage experiments - sample needs to be
    translated
  • Implementation
  • Based on a commercial mechanical teeter-totter
  • Steel blade fully stops beam
  • Capable of ms transient time
  • Simple to operate
  • Use TTL pulses
  • Requires 100 mm Si3N4 to protect the steel blade
  • Requirements
  • lt 3 ms switching time
  • lt 8 ms in close/open cycle time
  • Only for lt 10 Hz operation
  • Withstand full LCLS flux

http//www.azsol.ch/
38
Harmonic Rejection Mirrors (WBS 1.5.3.6)
  • Purposes
  • Provide isolation of FEL fundamental from high
    harmonics
  • LUSI detectors not designed to be energy resolved
  • Implementation
  • Low pass filter using X-ray mirrors at grazing
    incidence
  • Using highly polished Si single crystal
    substrates
  • 3.5 mrad incidence angle
  • 300 mm long
  • No pre-figure, no bender
  • Figure-error specs defined to ensure FEL natural
    divergence not effected
  • R 150 km
  • Roughness specs to minimize wavefront distortion
    and coherence degradation
  • rms 0.1 nm
  • Requirements
  • Energy range 6-8.265 keV
  • 104 contrast ratio between fundamental and the
    3rd harmonic
  • 80 overall throughput for fundamental
  • Minimize wavefront distortion
  • Withstand full FEL flux

39
DCO Integration into Instruments
  • XPP Instrument

Intensity-position
Intensity-position
Intensity/ profile
Intensity/ profile
Slits
Slits
Be-focusing lens
Pulse picker /Attenuator
Harmonic rejection
There are 15 diagnostics/common optics
components in XPP
40
DCO Scope
  • Work Breakdown Structure

Engineering of mono is now managed by the XCS
team
41
Device/Component Counts
  • Total device/component counts

Engineering of mono is now managed by the XCS
team
42
Progress Since CD-2
  • DCO progress

Engineering of mono is now managed by the XCS
team
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com