Title: Richard G. Little, AICP
1The Changing Landscape of Infrastructure Decision
Making USC Policy Luncheon July 19, 2007
Financial and Political Realities of
Infrastructure Investment in 21st Century
California
Richard G. Little, AICP USC Keston Institute for
Public Finance and Infrastructure Policy
2Is there a crisis in infrastructure funding?
That depends on whom you ask, but if you define
crisis as having needs that far outstrip any
readily sustainable way to pay for them, then
yes, we have an infrastructure funding crisis.
3Why is this?
There are only a limited number of sources for
transportation funds and they are already
overcommitted. Current revenues can barely
support maintenance and repair, there is little
left for major renovation or additional capacity.
4Some basic realities of public finance
- There are two ways to pay for infrastructure,
taxes or fees - There are 100 pennies in a dollar and you can
only spend them once. - If we want to buy more infrastructure, we need to
take the pennies from another pile (education,
public safety, healthcare) or get more dollars.
5How has transportation infrastructure
traditionally been funded?
- Pay as you go current revenues from fuel and
sales taxes, general revenue, and user fees - Debt selling bonds or notes backed by full
faith and credit or revenue streams - Intergovernmental transfers grants from one
level of government to another (Highway Trust
Fund)
6Is pay-as-you-go financing the answer?
- The initial cost of most major infrastructure and
capital construction projects precludes this
method of financing them?very little gets built - Appropriating the amounts necessary to actually
get something built would mean more revenues
(taxes or fees) or reductions to other
non-capital programs
7A quick take on debt
Depending on the interest rate, total debt
service (principal interest) over the life of a
30-year bond is about 2x the principal
amount. These payments must come from general
revenues (taxes) or user fees (tolls).
8More federal assistance isnt likely anytime soon
9State and local sources dont look so good either
General and special tax revenues continue to
provide only a portion of the necessary funds
required to maintain, rebuild, and expand
Californias transportation systemwe will need
to find more creative solutions to ensure the
continued viability of critical services.
10Motor fuel taxes as a revenue source
- Revenue does not rise automatically with
inflation as does income tax or sales tax - Improving fuel economy lowers revenue per mile of
driving - Revenue declining precipitously in relation to VMT
11What could California buy with the fuel tax?
- 1/gal of fuel tax 175,000,000
- 20/gal 3.5 Billion/year or the debt service
for a 35 Billion bond - If you drive 40,000 mpy in a vehicle that gets 20
mpg this will cost you 1.10 per day.
12So, where will new money come from to make
needed investments?
- Demand management strategies, including
congestion pricing, as an integral part of
project planning - More user fees (TOLLS!!!) where the beneficiary
pays for services received - Non-enterprise resource streams outside of
general revenues - Increased use of private equity capital to fund
traditionally public services
New ways of thinking about what we do, how we do
it, and how its paid for.
13This will require considerable political will
The political process needs to be forthright and
help voters realize that unless there is a
fundamental sea change in how we approach funding
for transportation and other infrastructure,
necessary rehabilitation and new capacity will be
long-delayed if provided at all. This is a
classic budget tradeoff situation.
14Tradeoffs used to be rather simple
15Todays decisions must achieve multiple
objectives and satisfy many stakeholders
Success Zone
Fiscal Conservatism
Infrastructure Needs
Public Employee Issues
Environmental Concerns
Social Equity
16PPPs ?when public funding isnt enough
Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) are
contractual agreements between the public and
private sectors wherein the private sector agrees
to deliver services in exchange for a fee.
The private sector typically agrees to finance,
build, operate, and maintain the infrastructure
assets (mostly, but not exclusively,
transportation) necessary to deliver the services.
17Partnering of the public and private sectors
takes many forms
18Motivations for Public Private Partnerships
- Public Sector Motivations
- Constraints on public sectors ability/willingness
to raise new revenues desire to leverage
multiple sources of funding - Opportunities to take advantage of project
finance techniques not available to the public
sector and/or to transfer new project risks to
private sector - Introduction of market pricing mechanisms to
manage constrained resources and move toward
user pays approach - Private Sector Motivations
- Returns from stable long duration cash flow
profile of essential infrastructure assets - Opportunity to deploy integrated design,
construction and operation capabilities and reap
the benefits of innovation
19Can PPPs be a win-win for California?
If the private sector can deliver mobility in
selected corridors at less cost to the public at
large and make a profit at the same time, why
should we care?
This is what remains to be proven!
20Some final thoughts
- Most of the aging infrastructure we strive to
maintain is based on models from the 18th and
19th centuries (if not earlier) - We will increasingly be challenged to generate
the financial resources to offset the entropy
produced as these systems age - We need to devote some thinking to new models of
service delivery that are not so dependent on
energy-intensive engineered works (i.e., How do
we deliver the services without the systems?
We need to begin a dialogue, NOW!
21Thank You!
Richard G. Little, AICP Director The Keston
Institute for Public Finance and Infrastructure
Policy University of Southern California RGL
236 Los Angeles, CA 90089 phone (213)
740-4120 fax (213) 821-1039 email
rglittle_at_usc.edu Website www.usc.edu/keston