Title: None
1University of Illinois
Finance 431 April 20, 2006
CATS ARE DOGS
PwC
2Agenda
PwC
- What is a Catastrophe
- Managing Catastrophe Risk
- Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
- Hurricane Katrina
- Rating Agencies and Catastrophes
- Final Points
3Catastrophe Exposure in the United States
What is a Catastrophe
PwC
- Types of Catastrophes Traditional
- Hurricanes / Typhoons
- Earthquakes
- Floods
- Tornados
- Man-made (fires, explosions)
- Types of Catastrophes Alternative
- Terrorist Acts
- Asteroids
- Tsunami
- Power Outages
4The Costs of Catastrophes
What is a Catastrophe
PwC
- Property Damage
- Homes Most losses except for flood are covered
by a traditional homeowners policy. Storm Surge
during a hurricane is considered flood and not
covered. - Cars - Vehicles are covered for most events.
- Commercial Structures Commercial buildings and
structures are generally covered for most events
including flood. - Human Casualties
- These may not correlate with economic loss
(Tsunami, Galveston TX 1900) - May have incidental impact on insured losses
(Life insurance, casualty damages) - Other Costs
- Additional Living Expense Temporary
accommodations and expenses. - Loss adjustment expenses Insurers usually spend
a large amount of money to service policyholders
following a catastrophe. - Coverage Extensions Business Interruption,
Contingent Business Interruptions, Civil
Authority, Off Premises Power.
5The Rising Costs of Catastrophes
What is a Catastrophe
PwC
- The economic costs of covering catastrophes is
outpacing inflation for the following reasons - Demographic Shifts Populations are moving into
more catastrophic exposed regions. - New Perils The emergence of new potential
risks, such as terrorism increase the expected
catastrophic loss. - Global Economic Development As countries
develop economically the amount of exposed
property increases. This property is generally
covered by an insurance vehicle. - Public Expectation The public has rising
expectations about their entitlement to be made
whole after an event.
6Financing the Costs of Catastrophes
What is a Catastrophe
PwC
- Public Individuals pay premiums for insurance
to cover their personal property from damage due
to catastrophes and other perils. - Government Uninsurable perils such as flood and
war are generally covered by the government. The
government may also subsidize private insurers
(ie TRIA, FHCF, FEMA). Insurers Investors put
capital at risk in the form of insurance/reinsuran
ce companies (or cat bonds) to make an adequate
return.
7Managing Catastrophe Risk
Managing Catastrophe Risk
PwC
- The insurance industry plays a significant role
in assuming catastrophe risk and has developed
several products to manage catastrophe risk. The
initial risk is written in the form of insurance
policies to either individuals, businesses or
governments.
- Insurance companies have several ways of managing
catastrophe risk. These include - Exposure Reduction
- Government Subsidies
- Reinsurance
8Ways Insurance Companies Manage Catastrophe Risk
Managing Catastrophe Risk
PwC
- Exposure Reductions Insurers have reduced
exposure to catastrophes two main ways. - Restriction of policy terms Insurers have
implemented wind and hurricane deductibles which
are much higher than the standard policy
deductibles. These are typically stated as a
of a buildings value. - Non renewal of high risk customers Insurance
companies are non-renewing coastal properties in
an attempt to reduce exposure to wind events.
This is happening in the gulf and northeastern
states.
9Ways Insurance Companies Manage Catastrophe Risk
Managing Catastrophe Risk
PwC
- Government Subsidies Federal and State
governments have legislation that assumes
exposure from the insurance industry. - California Earthquake Authority (CEA) Insurers
write policies and cede premium and losses to the
CEA. - Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (FHCF)
Subsidized reinsurance is provided to the
industry. Shortfalls funded through statewide
premium assessments. - Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Covers defined
acts of terrorism. - New initiatives are being forwarded by the
industry subsequent to Hurricane Katrina
10Ways Insurance Companies Manage Catastrophe Risk
Managing Catastrophe Risk
PwC
- Reinsurance Insurers look to the private sector
to provide coverage in various forms. - Excess of Loss Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
- Per-Risk Excess Reinsurance
- Facultative Reinsurance
- Cat Bonds
- These Coverages cover large losses in addition
to catastrophes
11Introduction to Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
Treaties
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Property catastrophe treaty reinsurance is the
most popular way for insurance companies to
mitigate catastrophe risk. - Common Terms of a Property Catastrophe Treaty
- Per Occurrence They only cover losses from a
distinct catastrophic event. - Excess of Loss They have a fixed limit of
coverage and have a fixed retention. - Two Loss Warranty At least two insured
structures must be damaged for the treaty to
apply. Catastrophic damage to a single structure
is covered by facultative contracts or risk
excess treaties.
12More Treaty Terms
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Covers losses for a distinct period (usually 12
months) regardless of when the underlying policy
was written. - Reinstatement Provisions Should one event occur
that causes losses to the policy, the reinsurer
must offer an additional reinstatement of the
limit at the premium rate. The reinsurer is
usually forced to offer one reinstatement. After
two events the primary insurer must renegotiate
another treaty. - Hours Clause An hours clause defines the
duration of the catastrophe. This is typically
72 hours. The retention and limit apply to all
losses during the occurrence. Should the
catastrophe last more than 72 hours, the limit
may be reinstated.
13Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Programs
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
140M
Reinsurer B
- Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Treaties are
typically part of a program. This program would
be stated as follows - Reinsurer A is taking an 80 share of the layer
80x20. This translates into Reinsurer A is
reimbursing the primary carrier for losses in
excess of 20 Million per occurrence up to a
limit of 80 Million. - Reinsurer B is taking an 80 share of the layer
40x100. - The primary insurer is responsible for any losses
in gray or above 140 Million.
100M
Reinsurer A
20M
0
14Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Programs -
Coinsurance
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
140M
Reinsurer B
- Primary insurers are usually not able to cede
100 of the loss. The portion they retain in
called coinsurance. - Coinsurance is required to avoid the two
following forms of adverse selection. - Writing large amounts of catastrophe exposed risk
because they have reinsured the risk away. - Not controlling losses during the claim
settlement process after the event has occurred.
100M
Reinsurer A
20M
0
Coinsurance
15Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Models
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- In the past insurers used to look at long term
analysis of catastrophe data to assess the cat
potential and price insurance. This technique
may still be used to price freeze and or tornado
risks. - Today computer models dominate the risk
management landscape of the property catastrophe
insurance markets. - There are a handful of models available although
three companies dominate the market (AIR, RMS,
EQECAT). - The models are stochastic in nature and estimate
damages for thousands of years at a time. This
gives a picture of not only the average of
expected value but the entire loss distribution.
16Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Models
What is a Catastrophe
PwC
- These models have two main components. Peril
scenario generators and damage functions. - The peril scenario generators model hurricane
path and wind-speed for storms and earth movement
for earthquakes. - Often historical records are scrutinized and
thousands of years of geological data are
considered.
17Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Models
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- The damage functions are engineering functions
that estimate the percent of structure damage for
a given wind-speed or earth movement. - These are often a function of a structures
- Location
- Age
- Class
- Construction
18Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Model Output
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- An insurer would input information on his book of
business into the model. - The output would include expected value estimates
and an exceedance curve similar to the one of the
left. - Using management judgment and risk tolerances the
insurer can begin to manage its risk.
19Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Model Output
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Expected loss The loss cost for various layer
of reinsurance. - PMLs (Probable maximum loss) This is generally
stated with an associated annual frequency. - 250 Year PML 500 Million
- 500 Year PML 1,500 Million
- These imply
- On average a loss of at least 500 Million will
occur every 250 years. - On average a loss of at least 1.5 Billion will
occur every 500 years.
20Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Model Output
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
Rates on a property catastrophe treaty are
typically quoted using the term Rate On Line.
RATE ON LINE
TREATY PREMIUM
TREATY LIMIT
Roughly equal to the probability of payment.
21Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Reinsurers
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Property catastrophe reinsurers take advantage of
geographic diversification. They write treaties
all over the world with the idea that Japan is
not correlated with Florida is not correlated
with California. This is simple financial
management. Adding uncorrelated risks decreases
the overall volatility of the portfolio. This
premise also raises the profit or risk load
charged in areas with high cat risk. - Property catastrophe reinsurers are not in a
position to take large amounts of investment
risk. Should a catastrophe occur they require a
large amount of cash in a short period of time to
pay claims. This is changing as more are
engaging in credit facilities to assist with
post-event cash flow.
22Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Reinsurers
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Property catastrophe reinsurers manage their risk
very much like their customers. One vehicle is
retrocessional coverage - Retrocessional coverage is reinsurance for
reinsurers. It is very expensive due to the risk
and uncertainty of the underlying exposure. - There is a lot of parameter uncertainty because
the retrocessionaire is so far removed from the
original risks. - Retro writers generally cannot purchase
traditional reinsurance because of market spiral.
23Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Reinsurers
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- In addition to retrocessional coverage,
reinsurers also manage risk using - ILWs
- Cat Bonds
- Cat Swaps
- Side cars
24Property Catastrophe Reinsurance ILWs
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Industry loss warranties pay a fixed amount based
of the amount of industry loss. For example, a
20 Million ILW with a 5 Billion trigger, would
pay the purchaser 20 Million in the event of a
5 Billion or greater industry loss. - Industry loss amounts are published by PCS
(Property Claim Services) for US losses and SIGMA
(a division of Swiss Re) for other losses around
the world. - These expose the purchaser to basis risk, or the
risk that the purchaser has a large loss but the
industry does not. - These are currently an easy way to enter the
property catastrophe reinsurance market. Many
hedge funds are getting into this arena.
25Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Cat Bonds
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Bonds issued to cover catastrophe risk were
developed subsequent to Hurricane Andrew. These
bonds are structured so that the investor has a
good return if there are no qualifying events and
a poor return if a loss occurs. Losses can be
triggered on an industry index or on an indemnity
basis. - The advantage of these vehicles is that you gain
access to the large capital available in the
financial markets and that the bonds diversify a
standard investment portfolio. - The disadvantages is that they expose the issuer
to basis risk, they have large issuing costs.
26Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Cat Swaps
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- Generally between two sophisticated parties.
- Reinsurer A will have too much exposure in one
area and Reinsurer B will have over-exposure in
an uncorrelated zone. - The two parties will agree on indexes which are
typically general reinsurance programs in the
market and design a treaty whereby losses are
triggered by the experience of the index treaties
in the particular zones. - Both are exposed to significant basis risk.
- This is attractive since, theoretically, no
profit changes hands and the cost of the
protection is small from an allocated capital
standpoint.
27Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Side cars
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- These vehicles came into existence in the past
few years. - A hedge fund that wishes to get into the
reinsurance business will start a special purpose
vehicle with a reinsurer. - This is usually capitalized by both parties.
- The side car assumes a portion of the exposure
from the reinsurer in the form of a reinsurance
contract. - The reinsurer is able to reduce its exposure.
- The hedge fund is able to get into reinsurance
without - Hiring underwriters
- Buying models
- Getting rated by the rating agencies.
28Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Side cars
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance
PwC
- These vehicles came into existence in the past
few years. - A hedge fund that wishes to get into the
reinsurance business will start a special purpose
vehicle with a reinsurer. - This is usually capitalized by both parties.
- The side car assumes a portion of the exposure
from the reinsurer in the form of a reinsurance
contract. - The reinsurer is able to reduce its exposure.
- The hedge fund is able to get into reinsurance
without - Hiring underwriters
- Buying models
- Getting rated by the rating agencies.
29Hurricane Katrina Changed the Industry
Hurricane Katrina
PwC
- Largest insured loss ever as the insurance costs
are approaching 50 Billion. - This does not include the governments tab of an
estimated 200 Billion. - Estimates of damages produced by the models for
storms similar to Katrina were grossly
understated. - Several reinsurers were impaired by the losses
incurred from Hurricane Katrina. - Reinsurance demand and prices went up by
significant percentages (Was it enough?) - Models were/are being adjusted for the
multi-decadal changes in hurricane activity,
driving up loss costs. - Rating agencies imposed stricter rules for
capital adequacy.
30Rating Agencies Have a Significant Impact on
Property Catastrophe Insurance and Reinsurance
Rating Agencies
PwC
- The major rating agencies, AM Best and SP
publish financial strength ratings for insurers
and reinsurers. - Ratings are indicative of financial strength and
are used by buyers of (re)insurance to select
counterparties. (Re)insurance is not useful if
you cannot collect recoveries after an event. - The key factors analyzed by the rating agencies
are - Financial performance
- Exposure to catastrophes
- Strength of management
31Rating Agencies Have a Significant Impact on
Property Catastrophe Insurance and Reinsurance
Rating Agencies
PwC
- Reinsurers typically cannot write any business if
their rating is below a certain level. (Typically
A) - Rating agencies have become much more focused on
cat risk after the past few years of significant
losses. - Their quantitative models consider aggregate PMLs
and the impact of such events on the financial
statements. Previously only event PMLs were
considered. - Actual Katrina loss results were compared against
peers and previously supplied estimates to
determine the potential for downgrades.
32Conclusions
Conclusion
- If you work in insurance, catastrophes will
affect you. - Catastrophe risk is an increasing cost for
society. - The property catastrophe reinsurance business is
very complex. - New vehicles are being created to mitigate
catastrophe risk.
33Follow-Up
- Should you need any assistance please contact me
at - James Matusiak
- PricewaterhouseCoopers
- One North Wacker
- Chicago, IL 60606
- james.matusiak_at_us.pwc.com