Student Teacher Growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Student Teacher Growth

Description:

... Cox. University of Worcester ... Part 1 The wider TDA context and how University of Worcester responded ... How we responded at the University of Worcester ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: Ils60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Student Teacher Growth


1
Student Teacher Growth
  • Using Additionality in ITE as a Vehicle for
    Practical SEN Training
  • Rachel Barrell and Robyn Cox
  • University of Worcester

2
  • This seminar outlines how one ITE provider has
    embraced recent TDA initiatives to enhance the
    profile of SEN in an undergraduate programme
  • Following the implementation of the TDA pilot
    study we reflected on and refined the programme
    to enhance the experience. The seminar will
    present some practical solutions to the problems
    that we encountered.
  • By drawing on interview, observation and
    questionnaire data a close insight to the student
    teacher growth will be made together with
    recommendations for good practice in the area.

3
Part 1 The wider TDA context and how University
of Worcester responded
Part 2 Description of our implementation - the
TDA pilot - embedding in ITE provision
Part 3 The research project
Part 4 Additionality and future plans
4
Part 1 The wider TDA context and how University
of Worcester responded
Andrew Adonis, Minister for Children, Schools and
Learners, said The Government is committed to
securing better outcomes for children with
special educational needs and disabilities and
ensuring they get the best possible deal.
Improving workforce skills is central to our
plans and the lions share of this money some
12m is being devoted to work designed to
improve coverage of SEN and disability in initial
teacher training, induction and continuing
professional development. (2008)
5
Context of Project for ITT students
  • The release of Every Child Matters (2004)
    prompted questions about personalised learning?
  • The new QTS standards devote a standard (Q10) to
    this area
  • ITT is fundamental to making sure that every
    teacher has the skills to personalise learning.
    2020 Vision Report (2006)
  • How do we empower students to fulfil these
    obligations?

6
Challenges for ITT
  • TDA identify that there is currently an
    inconsistency in provision across ITT providers
    in the preparation of teachers to for special
    provision
  • These skills as fundamental to ITT and require
    demonstrating and embedding good practice
    (2006).
  • GTC (2007) enable trainees to gain experience
    of working with children with a range of special
    educational needs.

7
How we responded at the University of Worcester
  • Male (2006) Why do students lack confidence in
    working with children with SEN?
  • Lack of knowledge
  • Fear of the unknown
  • Doubts about abilities to cope with severe needs
    / challenging behaviours
  • Lack of specialist skills

8
Reflecting on the student experiences
  • Strong interest from students to build expertise,
    take risks and overcome fear of the unknown.
  • Module flexibility additional experiences and
    alternative pathways
  • Staff expertise and development
  • Vehicle chosen TDA funded pilot project 2006/7
    in partnership with Institute of Education,
    University of London

9
Part 2
  • Part 2 Description of our implementation
  • - the TDA pilot
  • - embedding in ITE provision

10
TDA SEN and/or Disability training materials and
extended placements.
  • Element 2 Extended placements provision
  • Aims and Rationale
  • To develop trainees knowledge, skills and
    understanding of inclusive practice.
  • To challenge stereotypes and see past the label
    to the child.
  • To generate interest in working in special
    provision when qualified.
  • To enhance their skills when working with
    children with additional needs in mainstream
    education.

11
The placement over two years
Year 1 pilot 2006-2007
Year 2 Embedding 2007-2008
Year 3 Development 2008-2009
12
Methodology Cycle 1
  • Year 1 Pilot
  • 10 students from UG Year 2
  • 4 week paired placement
  • 3 special schools.
  • MLD, SLD, ASD pupils
  • Two assessed visits by University tutor
  • Pre and post practice tutorials
  • Completed adapted Professional Development
    Profile (QTS SEN standards)
  • Bespoke mentor training

13
Methodology Cycle 2
  • Year 2 Embedding
  • 8 students from UG year 2 completed a 4 week
    paired placement
  • 3 SEN schools Cycle 2
  • MLD, SLD, ASD, PMLD
  • Pre and post practice tutorials
  • Completed adapted Professional Development
    Profile (QTS SEN standards)
  • Unassessed placements why is this important?

14
  • Year 2 Embedding continued
  • Students took part in semi-structured interviews
    focussed on Males (2006) confidence indicators
  • Facilitators of learning mentoring system put in
    place (mentors students from Cycle 1)
  • Establishing closer connection to colleagues in
    SEN provision
  • Bespoke mentor training

15
Methodology Cycle 3
  • Year 3 Development
  • 16 from UG year 2
  • students a 4 week paired placement
  • 7 special schools
  • A range of additional needs
  • Finely tuned selection process Cycle 2 students
    involved in selection process
  • Completed adapted Professional Development
    Profile (QTS SEN standards)
  • Unassessed placements

16
What we have learnt
  • Selection procedures need to be rigorous and
    transparent (not just looking for the best
    student)
  • Relationships with colleagues in school central
    and important (bringing them in from the cold and
    listening to their voice)
  • Students need to be carefully prepared and
    certain of support (peer mentoring available and
    committed academic staff, external training
    course for behaviour management)

17
Part 3
  • The data collection and the student voice

18
The Street Fair Oxford Reading Tree
19
Sequencing- Using Symbols
20
TEACCH
21
Two sets of data collection
  • Cycle 1 Pilot
  • Assessed observations
  • Pre and post practice tutorials
  • Student assignments
  • Student presentations
  • Cycle 2 - Embedding
  • Semi structured interviews
  • Pre and post practice tutorials and
    questionnaires
  • Student assignments and presentations

22
Assessed observations Cycle 1 Pilot
23
Assessed observations Cycle 1 Pilot
24
Pre and post practice tutorials and
questionnaires
  • As it common prior to students going into
    placement to have a tutorial with the supervisory
    tutor we kept this constant during Cycle 1 and 2.
  • Cycle 2 we added a pre and post practice
    questionnaire based on Males (2006) confidence
    indicators and the seven SEN standards.

25
Interviews Cycle 2
  • Again these allowed the student to talk about
    their experiences in a non-threatening situation.
  • Prior to the placement all students expressed
    lack of confidence and fear of taking risks
    whereas, after the practice they were confident
    to express things like-
  • It has made me a better teacher.

26
The assignments and presentations - A Celebration
of Success
  • Presentations were given by students in Cycle 1
    and 2.
  • Cycle 1 audience were class teachers, UW staff
    and project evaluation team from the Institute of
    Education, University of London
  • Very positive preconceptions of special
    provision challenged.
  • I have learnt a lot about the meaning
    behind the classroom.

27
  • You were absolutely right about feeling
    exhausted - there is just so much information to
    take in and it turns all previous placements on
    their head brilliant.
  • we were more able to ask questions and have a
    completely open mind to all that we see, do and
    learn.
  • I quickly became immersed in the whole new world
    of education and care.
  • Today was great! Really got an idea for the
    school.
  • I am slightly worried about being able to
    control certain pupils behaviour but Im sure I
    will pick it up eventually!

28
Part 4
  • Additionality and Future plans

29
Additionality
  • Our provision goes beyond compliance to achieve a
    level of excellence open to engaging with
    external initiatives.
  • A proactive provision provides a responsive
    curriculum and a hands on pedagogy.
  • This equips our students to be thoughtful,
    talented and in demand teachers.

30
What Next? The National Context
  • Launch of SEN and disability training materials
    for ITT in June 2008
  • Every child deserves chance to make the most of
    their potential and we can only make this happen
    if teacher have the knowledge, understanding and
    skills to identify pupils learning needs at an
    early stage and adapt their teaching to meet
    those needs.
  • Lord Adonis (2008)

31
TDA Training Materials in mainstream provision
  • 18 taught modules aimed to develop trainees
    knowledge, skills and understanding
  • Includes DVD clips to support training across the
    degree programme
  • Extensive resource for implementing into UG
    modules (www.ttrb.ac.uk)
  • Using these to support both students undertaking
    extended placement and general cohort in UG Year
    2.

32
Successful areas to build on
  • Student knowledge and transfer of Multi-Sensory
    Teaching Strategies
  • That the Traditional model of classroom
    challenged. Q18, Q30
  • Use of specialised teaching techniques TEAACH,
    PECS, Snoezelen, Sherbourne
  • Links with external agencies Ed Psy, SLT, OT,
    music therapy, social workers Q20
  • Links with QTS standards creative approach
    towards innovation Q8

33
Student Teacher Growth?
  • Are the skills learnt in special provision
    transferable into mainstream?
  • Flexible in applying existing knowledge and
    understanding of a wider range of diverse needs
  • What about the other way round?
  • She has adapted planning to support the pupils
    in her class and adapted resources to meet the
    needs of the pupils.

34
  • Mechanistic v flexible teaching approach
  • She quickly learnt that by adapting an intensive
    interaction approach to play and learning, she
    could communicate to and with pupils
    successfully.

35
References
  • DfES (2004) Every Child Matters Change for
    Children, HMSO, London
  • DfES (2006) 2020 Vision Report of the Teaching
    and Learning in 2020 Review Group. London HMSO

General Teaching Council for England (2007)
Consultation on draft guidance from DfES on
Planning and Developing Special Educational
Provision. Male, D. (2006) Including Students
with special educational needs in mainstream
schools What do teachers need to know,
understand and be able to do? What do they need
to have experience of? University of London TDA
(2008) Special Educational Needs and/or
Disabilities A Training Resource for Initial
Teacher Training Providers, Primary Undergraduate
Courses. London TDA TDA (2007) Professional
Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and
Requirements for Initial Teacher Training.
London TDA
36
Questions..
  • We would appreciate any feedback or questions.
  • Thank you for coming along to this session and we
    hope it has been informative and useful.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com