Title: Student Teacher Growth
1Student Teacher Growth
- Using Additionality in ITE as a Vehicle for
Practical SEN Training - Rachel Barrell and Robyn Cox
- University of Worcester
2- This seminar outlines how one ITE provider has
embraced recent TDA initiatives to enhance the
profile of SEN in an undergraduate programme - Following the implementation of the TDA pilot
study we reflected on and refined the programme
to enhance the experience. The seminar will
present some practical solutions to the problems
that we encountered. - By drawing on interview, observation and
questionnaire data a close insight to the student
teacher growth will be made together with
recommendations for good practice in the area.
3Part 1 The wider TDA context and how University
of Worcester responded
Part 2 Description of our implementation - the
TDA pilot - embedding in ITE provision
Part 3 The research project
Part 4 Additionality and future plans
4Part 1 The wider TDA context and how University
of Worcester responded
Andrew Adonis, Minister for Children, Schools and
Learners, said The Government is committed to
securing better outcomes for children with
special educational needs and disabilities and
ensuring they get the best possible deal.
Improving workforce skills is central to our
plans and the lions share of this money some
12m is being devoted to work designed to
improve coverage of SEN and disability in initial
teacher training, induction and continuing
professional development. (2008)
5Context of Project for ITT students
- The release of Every Child Matters (2004)
prompted questions about personalised learning?
- The new QTS standards devote a standard (Q10) to
this area - ITT is fundamental to making sure that every
teacher has the skills to personalise learning.
2020 Vision Report (2006) - How do we empower students to fulfil these
obligations?
6Challenges for ITT
- TDA identify that there is currently an
inconsistency in provision across ITT providers
in the preparation of teachers to for special
provision - These skills as fundamental to ITT and require
demonstrating and embedding good practice
(2006). - GTC (2007) enable trainees to gain experience
of working with children with a range of special
educational needs.
7How we responded at the University of Worcester
- Male (2006) Why do students lack confidence in
working with children with SEN? - Lack of knowledge
- Fear of the unknown
- Doubts about abilities to cope with severe needs
/ challenging behaviours - Lack of specialist skills
8Reflecting on the student experiences
- Strong interest from students to build expertise,
take risks and overcome fear of the unknown. - Module flexibility additional experiences and
alternative pathways - Staff expertise and development
- Vehicle chosen TDA funded pilot project 2006/7
in partnership with Institute of Education,
University of London
9Part 2
- Part 2 Description of our implementation
- - the TDA pilot
- - embedding in ITE provision
10TDA SEN and/or Disability training materials and
extended placements.
- Element 2 Extended placements provision
- Aims and Rationale
- To develop trainees knowledge, skills and
understanding of inclusive practice. - To challenge stereotypes and see past the label
to the child. - To generate interest in working in special
provision when qualified. - To enhance their skills when working with
children with additional needs in mainstream
education.
11The placement over two years
Year 1 pilot 2006-2007
Year 2 Embedding 2007-2008
Year 3 Development 2008-2009
12Methodology Cycle 1
- Year 1 Pilot
- 10 students from UG Year 2
- 4 week paired placement
- 3 special schools.
- MLD, SLD, ASD pupils
- Two assessed visits by University tutor
- Pre and post practice tutorials
- Completed adapted Professional Development
Profile (QTS SEN standards) - Bespoke mentor training
13Methodology Cycle 2
- Year 2 Embedding
- 8 students from UG year 2 completed a 4 week
paired placement - 3 SEN schools Cycle 2
- MLD, SLD, ASD, PMLD
- Pre and post practice tutorials
- Completed adapted Professional Development
Profile (QTS SEN standards) - Unassessed placements why is this important?
14- Year 2 Embedding continued
- Students took part in semi-structured interviews
focussed on Males (2006) confidence indicators - Facilitators of learning mentoring system put in
place (mentors students from Cycle 1) - Establishing closer connection to colleagues in
SEN provision - Bespoke mentor training
15Methodology Cycle 3
- Year 3 Development
- 16 from UG year 2
- students a 4 week paired placement
- 7 special schools
- A range of additional needs
- Finely tuned selection process Cycle 2 students
involved in selection process - Completed adapted Professional Development
Profile (QTS SEN standards) - Unassessed placements
16What we have learnt
- Selection procedures need to be rigorous and
transparent (not just looking for the best
student) - Relationships with colleagues in school central
and important (bringing them in from the cold and
listening to their voice) - Students need to be carefully prepared and
certain of support (peer mentoring available and
committed academic staff, external training
course for behaviour management)
17Part 3
- The data collection and the student voice
18The Street Fair Oxford Reading Tree
19Sequencing- Using Symbols
20TEACCH
21Two sets of data collection
- Cycle 1 Pilot
- Assessed observations
- Pre and post practice tutorials
- Student assignments
- Student presentations
- Cycle 2 - Embedding
- Semi structured interviews
- Pre and post practice tutorials and
questionnaires - Student assignments and presentations
22Assessed observations Cycle 1 Pilot
23Assessed observations Cycle 1 Pilot
24Pre and post practice tutorials and
questionnaires
- As it common prior to students going into
placement to have a tutorial with the supervisory
tutor we kept this constant during Cycle 1 and 2.
- Cycle 2 we added a pre and post practice
questionnaire based on Males (2006) confidence
indicators and the seven SEN standards.
25Interviews Cycle 2
- Again these allowed the student to talk about
their experiences in a non-threatening situation.
- Prior to the placement all students expressed
lack of confidence and fear of taking risks
whereas, after the practice they were confident
to express things like- - It has made me a better teacher.
26The assignments and presentations - A Celebration
of Success
- Presentations were given by students in Cycle 1
and 2. - Cycle 1 audience were class teachers, UW staff
and project evaluation team from the Institute of
Education, University of London - Very positive preconceptions of special
provision challenged. - I have learnt a lot about the meaning
behind the classroom.
27- You were absolutely right about feeling
exhausted - there is just so much information to
take in and it turns all previous placements on
their head brilliant. - we were more able to ask questions and have a
completely open mind to all that we see, do and
learn. - I quickly became immersed in the whole new world
of education and care. - Today was great! Really got an idea for the
school. - I am slightly worried about being able to
control certain pupils behaviour but Im sure I
will pick it up eventually!
28Part 4
- Additionality and Future plans
29Additionality
- Our provision goes beyond compliance to achieve a
level of excellence open to engaging with
external initiatives. - A proactive provision provides a responsive
curriculum and a hands on pedagogy. - This equips our students to be thoughtful,
talented and in demand teachers.
30What Next? The National Context
- Launch of SEN and disability training materials
for ITT in June 2008 - Every child deserves chance to make the most of
their potential and we can only make this happen
if teacher have the knowledge, understanding and
skills to identify pupils learning needs at an
early stage and adapt their teaching to meet
those needs. - Lord Adonis (2008)
31TDA Training Materials in mainstream provision
- 18 taught modules aimed to develop trainees
knowledge, skills and understanding - Includes DVD clips to support training across the
degree programme - Extensive resource for implementing into UG
modules (www.ttrb.ac.uk) - Using these to support both students undertaking
extended placement and general cohort in UG Year
2.
32Successful areas to build on
- Student knowledge and transfer of Multi-Sensory
Teaching Strategies - That the Traditional model of classroom
challenged. Q18, Q30 - Use of specialised teaching techniques TEAACH,
PECS, Snoezelen, Sherbourne - Links with external agencies Ed Psy, SLT, OT,
music therapy, social workers Q20 - Links with QTS standards creative approach
towards innovation Q8
33Student Teacher Growth?
- Are the skills learnt in special provision
transferable into mainstream? - Flexible in applying existing knowledge and
understanding of a wider range of diverse needs - What about the other way round?
- She has adapted planning to support the pupils
in her class and adapted resources to meet the
needs of the pupils.
34- Mechanistic v flexible teaching approach
- She quickly learnt that by adapting an intensive
interaction approach to play and learning, she
could communicate to and with pupils
successfully.
35References
- DfES (2004) Every Child Matters Change for
Children, HMSO, London - DfES (2006) 2020 Vision Report of the Teaching
and Learning in 2020 Review Group. London HMSO
General Teaching Council for England (2007)
Consultation on draft guidance from DfES on
Planning and Developing Special Educational
Provision. Male, D. (2006) Including Students
with special educational needs in mainstream
schools What do teachers need to know,
understand and be able to do? What do they need
to have experience of? University of London TDA
(2008) Special Educational Needs and/or
Disabilities A Training Resource for Initial
Teacher Training Providers, Primary Undergraduate
Courses. London TDA TDA (2007) Professional
Standards for Qualified Teacher Status and
Requirements for Initial Teacher Training.
London TDA
36Questions..
- We would appreciate any feedback or questions.
- Thank you for coming along to this session and we
hope it has been informative and useful.