ARCH 1065 History and Theory of Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

ARCH 1065 History and Theory of Planning

Description:

Everything received as of last Friday has been marked ... rendered particularly evident by 'market triumphalism' after the collapse of the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: rmits
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ARCH 1065 History and Theory of Planning


1
ARCH 1065 History and Theory of Planning
  • Week Eleven
  • Planning Beyond the State

2
Course Mechanics Individual Research Feedback
  • Everything received as of last Friday has been
    marked
  • Individual research marks count for only a
    portion of the collaborative project grade if
    things did not go well, you can compensate by
    thoughtful contributions during the collaborative
    period
  • Major issues
  • Citation! Citation! Citation! if I have
    identified any problems with your citations, you
    must correct these during the collaborative
    period
  • Focus on academic and policy debates, rather than
    personal opinion or ungrounded generalisations
    (e.g., it may be true that most people think x
    but, for purposes of this assignment, you need to
    ground your assertions with reference to the
    literature)
  • Structure the order of paragraphs or sentences
    should be logical
  • Minor issues
  • Quotations always introduce and conclude
    quotations
  • Links and references to further resources are
    very helpful

3
Course Mechanics Assessments
  • Assessment updates have been prepared for
    everyone, and can be picked up near door
  • Summarising
  • Theoretical essays to date
  • Wiki
  • Individual assignment
  • Feedback on collaborative contributions to date
    (quantitative grade is not possible for this
    item, as contributions are not complete)
  • Participation
  • Tutorial presentation (if given)
  • Other participation feedback (quantitative grade
    not possible, as contributions not complete)
  • If there are mistakes, please let me know.

4
Collaboration Current Priorities
  • Through 5 June
  • Correct any citation issues identified in your
    marked individual assignment
  • Consider the feedback you have received on your
    individual essay, when contributing to the
    collaborative process
  • Create links and new pages by placing double
    square brackets around words that could be a new
    page title, e.g., Melbourne 2030
  • Names of people, places, major pieces of
    legislation, etc.
  • Words describing important topics
  • Edit and contribute to articles, or create and
    contribute to new ones

5
Lecture Overview
  • Last week
  • Brief introduction to social, economic and
    cultural dimensions of 1970s crisis
  • This week
  • Planning beyond the state
  • Next week
  • Contemporary issues
  • Recommendation
  • James Scott (1998) Seeing Like a State How
    Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition
    Have Failed, New Haven Yale University Press,
    especially ch. 4 The High-Modernist City an
    Experiment and a Critique

6
Planning Beyond the State
  • Critiques of the technocratic state yielded new
    conceptions of planning, each attempting to
    transcend different aspects of modernist planning
  • Principle of value neutrality
  • Expert-centred, top down planning
  • Faith in scientific progress
  • Orientation to amelioration, rather than
    fundamental transformation
  • New critiques and models
  • Advocacy planning
  • Marxist critiques of planning
  • Communicative action theory
  • Libertarian critiques of planning
  • Environmentalism
  • Feminism
  • Neo-liberalism
  • Postmodernism

7
Advocacy Planning
  • Rejection of principle of value neutrality
  • Planners always deploy values in the planning
    process the rhetoric of value neutrality
    functions as a cover for planning in the service
    of the status quo
  • Planners should actively embrace values
    supporting those at the margins of society
    planning should be oriented to transformation, to
    the achievement of a more just society
  • Often associated with planners who work in local
    communities, rather than for traditional
    government organisations, although some
    government planners also embraced this approach
  • Ideal of bringing expert, technical knowledge to
    local communities
  • Goal of assisting local communities to articulate
    their goals in terms that could be understood by
    formal political actors
  • Goal of advocating on behalf of local communities
  • Never dominant, but most common in 1960s-1970s
  • Criticised for
  • Naïve assumption that disempowered communities
    possessed a privileged view of social reality
    naïve rejection of the state
  • Patronisation professional planners often
    decided what communities needed
  • Disempowerment encouraging those communities to
    translate their political objectives into
    professional language, they inevitably watered
    down those objectives

8
Marxist Critiques of Planning
  • Revival of Marxism in late 1960s-1970s
  • Marxist revival spanned well beyond planning, in
    part due to 1970s fascination with Mao
  • Conceptualised in the planning literature as an
    attempt to address absence of spatial issues in
    Marx
  • In planning Manuel Castells, David Harvey, early
    Leonie Sandercock, and others strongest in the
    1970s, although some will still identify with
    Marxism today (tends to be called political
    economy in Australia)
  • Tended to criticise modernist planning for
  • Amelioration, which served to deflect
    revolutionary impulses by improving standards of
    living while leaving intact inequitable social
    relations
  • Individualism assumption that individual
    planners could make a significant difference,
    when Marxist theory held that structural factors
    were more important
  • Criticised for
  • Over-emphasis on structure left unclear how any
    person or group could ever fundamentally alter
    existing social relations
  • Uncertain how one could consistently be a planner
    within this framework
  • Problematic relationship with actually existing
    communism China, USSR rendered particularly
    evident by market triumphalism after the
    collapse of the USSR

9
Communicative Action
  • Several strains, all drawing on dimensions of
    Jürgen Habermas work (1970s-1990s)
  • Habermas goals are philosophical and
    epistemological how can we understand the
    emergence of democratic ideals, which emerged
    originally in societies that had never known
    democracy
  • Habermas argues that these ideals are embedded in
    human communication but, for various reasons,
    were only discovered in relatively recent history
  • Planning theory (Healey, Forester) tends to
    disregard Habermas philosophical aims, and to
    use him to argue for
  • the practice of collaboration as a social
    learning mechanism, and
  • the value of practical, rather than technical,
    knowledge
  • Attempts to
  • Redefine planning as a practical art, to validate
    the professional knowledge and skills of the
    planner without relying on modernist notions of
    top-down expertise
  • Reform planning practice to centre more on
    collaboration and shared learning
  • Criticised for
  • Retaining some aspects of planner-as-expert
  • Ameliorist concept of planning not
    revolutionary enough for some critics
  • Impractical or undesirable emphasis on consensus

10
Libertarian Critiques
  • Core concept society is too complex to be
    managed consciously by a central authority most
    human activities can be coordinated more
    efficiently by decentralised forms of
    self-regulation, particularly through markets
    (Hayek)
  • Prevalence
  • Not common within the planning profession,
    although a growing number of planners have
    embraced aspects of the concept over time
  • Dimensions of libertarian theories have entered
    other social theories, including Habermas
  • Critiques
  • Social justice markets increase social
    inequality, and the poor cannot signal their
    preferences through money
  • Externalities price signals cannot capture
    various externalities environmental, social,
    etc. for which charges are not applied
  • Markets are blunt instruments, capable of
    responding only to price signals, while remaining
    insensitive to why people are spending money
    (i.e., if other goods were available, if people
    were wealthier, etc., perhaps they would make
    other decisions)
  • People do not necessarily behave as rational
    maximisers, making the most reasonable decision,
    given the money they have available to spend
  • Sufficient levels of competition cannot always be
    sustained

11
Environmentalism
  • Major influence on planning, both through
    cultural shifts, and through changes to
    legislation
  • Shifting emphasis over time
  • Fears re fossil fuel shortage, population
    crisis, and zero growth campaigns
  • Concern with global management of pollution,
    global warming and other issues that span
    national borders
  • Sustainability proposals
  • Some parallels between concepts of
    self-regulating systems that run through
    libertarian and environmentalist critiques of the
    state nature and the environment both come to
    be conceptualised as potentially self-regulating
    system, if they are left free of human
    intervention

12
Feminism
  • Second Wave feminism 1970s
  • First Wave feminism often focussed on special
    roles women could uniquely perform
  • Second Wave feminism tended to focus on the
    potential for equality between men and women on
    womens ability to carry out the same tasks men
    carry out
  • Within planning, initial exploration of the
    concept of feminist planning theory, and on
    planning for the needs of women
  • Increasing uncertainty over whether there is, or
    should be, a distinctive form of feminist
    planning theory
  • Incorporation and expansion of some principles of
    planning for women into notions of inclusive
    planning for persons with various specialised
    needs

13
Neo-Liberalism
  • Often used very loosely, even within the academic
    literature, as a catch-all term for a wide range
    of approaches critical of state intervention into
    markets
  • More narrowly, refers to a combination of
    initiatives pioneered by Margaret Thatcher,
    Ronald Reagan, etc., characterised by
  • Delegation of control from the state to civil
    society (markets and voluntary associations) in
    many areas
  • Focus on drastic economic restructuring (market
    discipline) to correct the stagflation crisis of
    the 1970s and 1980s
  • Faith in the greater efficiency of the market and
    private industry, relative to state bureaucracies
  • Strategies, including the use of state power, to
    weaken the power of organised labour
  • Concentration and strengthening of state power in
    those areas over which the state retained
    jurisdiction
  • The current shortage in planning professionals
    derives, in part, from neo-liberal policies,
    which led to a short-term belief that planning
    (of all sorts) would not be in high demand

14
Postmodernism
  • Term is used very loosely, by critics and
    adherents, and can refer to
  • An aesthetic movement
  • An epistemological and historical critique of the
    Enlightenment and of scientific rationality
    (Lyotard and, at one remove, figures such as
    Derrida, Foucault, etc.)
  • The current historical period, characterised by
    contrast with the modernist (postwar) era
  • Most planning theory is too eclectic to invoke
    postmodernist epistemology consistently.
  • Some theorists invoke the critical conclusions of
    postmodernism, while inconsistently rejecting the
    relativist epistemology.
  • Others simply use postmodernism descriptively,
    without any critical intent.

15
Next Week Preview
  • Contemporary issues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com