Steve Walker Principal Specialist Inspector radiation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Steve Walker Principal Specialist Inspector radiation

Description:

Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 ... A radiation' trefoil. RPA consultation recommendations. Encapsulation Description ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: steve1355
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steve Walker Principal Specialist Inspector radiation


1
I'm from headquarters and here to help you!
Steve Walker Principal SpecialistInspector
(radiation) The Bootle Centre
2
Supplier Information (User Information)
  • Contents
  • Why have any?
  • Is it necessary?
  • What should it contain?

3
Contents
  • Why have any?
  • Employers cant comply without information
  • Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (HSAW)
  • Management of Health Safety at Work Regulations
    1999
  • Provision Use of Work Equipment Regulations
    1998
  • Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations
    1992 (amended in 2002)
  • And of course, the Ionising Radiations
    Regulations 1999.

4
Contents
  • Is it necessary?
  • YES!
  • Section 6 of HSAW

5
Section 6 HSAW
  • It shall be the duty of any person who designs,
    manufactures, imports or supplies any article for
    use at work.
  • to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable,
    that the article is so designed and constructed
    that it will be safe and without risks to health
    at all times when it is being set, used, cleaned
    or maintained by a person at work
  • to carry out or arrange for the carrying out of
    such testing and examination as may be necessary
    for the performance of the duty imposed on him by
    the preceding paragraph
  • to take such steps as are necessary to secure
    that persons supplied by that person with the
    article are provided with adequate information
    about the use for which the article is designed
    or has been tested and about any conditions
    necessary to ensure that it will be safe and
    without risks to health at all such times as are
    mentioned in paragraph (a) above and when it is
    being dismantled or disposed of and
  • to take such steps as are necessary to secure, so
    far as is reasonably practicable, that persons so
    supplied are provided with all such revisions of
    information provided to them by virtue of the
    preceding paragraph as are necessary by reason of
    its becoming known that anything gives rise to a
    serious risk to health or safety.

6
How onerous is the Section 6 Duty?
  • It extends to everything that is reasonably
    foreseeable
  • Section 6(10). For the purposes of this
    section an absence of safety or a risk to health
    shall be disregarded in so far as the case in or
    in relation to which it would arise is shown to
    be one the occurrence of which could not
    reasonably be foreseen and in determining
    whether any duty imposed by virtue of paragraph
    (a) of subsection (1), (1A) or (4) above has been
    performed regard shall be had to any relevant
    information or advice which has been provided to
    any person by the person by whom the article has
    been designed, manufactured, imported or supplied
    or, as the case may be, by the person by whom the
    substance has been manufactured, imported or
    supplied.

7
Reasonably Foreseeable?
8
Contents
  • What should it contain?
  • Short, sharp and to the point.
  • Less is often more!

9
  • Because one can have too much of agood thing!

10
Current Information Provision is Often Poor
  • Quantity Activity
  • Nuclide
  • Warnings
  • A radiation trefoil
  • RPA consultation recommendations
  • Encapsulation Description
  • Fabricated to standard XXX
  • Radioactive Substances Act Registration
  • Information about registration and holding
  • Ionising Radiations Regulations?
  • Cinderella topic

11
So how much information do we need?
  • Dose Rates
  • Contamination
  • Handling Precautions
  • Fabrication
  • Fire Performance
  • Dispersibility
  • Special Form
  • Longevity
  • Design Life
  • Working Life
  • Storage needs
  • Leakage testing
  • Appropriate?
  • How?
  • Transport Information

12
But Shouldnt RPAs do this for employers?
  • Currently they do
  • Mainly because of the way in which source use has
    evolved in industry
  • Big competent users in medical and nuclear
    sectors.
  • But is this efficient Health and Safety
    Assurance?
  • One RPA giving advice to the supplier obviates
    the need for the same advice to be given again
    and again to each radiation employer.
  • And always remember its the employer who has the
    duties, not the RPA
  • So, up-front help is clearly important to overall
    compliance performance.

13
Finally, when the inspector calls
Thank You. Any Questions?
  • Ignorance is a poor defence!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com