Photometric Studies of Eros from NEAR Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Photometric Studies of Eros from NEAR Data

Description:

Published Eros's photometric parameters (Domingue et al. 2002) 35th LPSC, ... Move Eros closer to the values of average S-type. Consistent with Eros spectrum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: astr5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Photometric Studies of Eros from NEAR Data


1
Photometric Studies of Eros from NEAR Data
  • Jianyang Li
  • Mike AHearn
  • Lucy McFadden

2
Disk-integrated Photometry Is Not Enough
  • Non-zero lightcurve amplitudes
  • Cross-section changing
  • Domingue et al. 2002
  • Whole-disk sense
  • Only NEAR images with whole disk

3
Forward Simulation
  • Hapkes parameters (Domingue et al. 2002)
  • Eross shape model (Thomas et al. 2002)
  • Compute theoretical lightcurves

4
Fit Ground Based Data
  • Lightcurve maxima
  • Assume the maximum cross-section 333 km2
  • RMS 0.064, 0.5 of the average lightcurve maxima

5
NEAR Data
  • Disk-resolved
  • 550nm (F1 filter)
  • Images at S/C range about 100 km, resolution
    10m/pix
  • Eross disk fill 70 image frame or more

6
Fitting Scheme
  • ? log ? / ? log w
  • (? ? / ? w )(w / ?)
  • Large quantity means important data
  • Published Eross photometric parameters (Domingue
    et al. 2002)

7
Our Scheme
  • Fit w and ? using MSI images around 60? phase
    angles
  • Fit g using all available MSI images (60?

MSI between 55? and 65?
All MSI data
8
Fitting NEAR MSI Data
  • Assume B01.0, h0.022
  • RMS error 0.0032, 6 of average
  • 10 error estimated from scattering of residual
  • Caused by albedo variation or surface feature?

9
Results and Comparison
10
Albedo w
  • Single-scattering albedo
  • Smaller than before
  • Comparable with simulations
  • Close to the average value of S-type asteroids
  • Consistent with spectrum

11
Asymmetry Factor g (-0.29 vs. -0.25)
12
Opposition Effect
  • Lack of data near opposition
  • NEAR MSI data are between 50? and 120?
  • Ground-based data only in fitting opposition
    parameters
  • In this work, B0 was allowed to exceed 1
  • B01.38, h0.015

13
Roughness Parameter ?
  • Image footprint size comparable with Clark et al.
    (2002), 2.5-5 km/spectrum
  • Domingue et al. (2002) used whole disk averaged

  • A local parameter and sensitive to scale size
    (Shepard 2001)
  • Different slope distributions at different scale
    sizes

14
Summary
  • Photometric analysis using NEAR MSI 550nm images,
    ground-based lightcurves, and theoretical
    simulations
  • Five Hapkes parameters were found
  • Geometric albedo 0.25, Bond albedo 0.098
  • Smaller than previous values
  • Move Eros closer to the values of average S-type
  • Consistent with Eros spectrum
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com