Prenatal Maternal Depression, Antidepressant Medication Use and Neonatal Outcomes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Prenatal Maternal Depression, Antidepressant Medication Use and Neonatal Outcomes

Description:

Prenatal Maternal Depression, Antidepressant Medication Use ... Multiple confounding factors (age, smoking, parity, other teratogenic agents) Polydrug exposure: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: rece152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prenatal Maternal Depression, Antidepressant Medication Use and Neonatal Outcomes


1
  • Prenatal Maternal Depression, Antidepressant
    Medication Use and Neonatal Outcomes
  • Using Linked Population Health Data
  • Tim F Oberlander MD, FRCPC
  • Centre for Community Child Health Research
  • Child Family Research Institute
  • R Howard Webster Professorship in Early Child
    Development
  • Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP)
  • University of British Columbia

2
Acknowledgements
  • No conflicts of interest Off Label Drug Use
  • CFRI UBC
  • Ruth Grunau
  • Shaila Misri
  • Joanne Weinberg
  • Wayne Riggs
  • Dan Rurak Ken Lim
  • Elizabeth Simpson
  • Human Early Learning Partnership
  • Clyde Hertzman Colleagues
  • Child and Youth Development Trajectory
    Research Unit
  • Bill Warburton
  • Early Human Experience Unit
  • Ursula Brain Mary Beckingham

3
The Context Mothers Mood, Infant and Childhood
Development and Behavior
SRI use
Fetal SRI exposure serotonin
Emotional behaviour (Maternal-Infant Interaction)
Serotonin (5HT) related outcomes in childhood
Neonatal Withdrawal
HPA Stress Response
Arousal regulation (Habituation, attention,
Executive function)
Neonatal Pain Reactivity
4

Medication vs. Depression effects Can they
be separated?
  • in most instances, it is not possible to
    differentiate drug-induced adverse effects from
    those induced by the disease process itself.
  • NTP-CERHR EXPERT PANEL REPORT on the REPRODUCTIVE
    and DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY of FLUOXETINE 2004

5
Barriers to typical cohort research
  • Sample size obstacles
  • Space, s time
  • Heterogeneity of population
  • Unexpected variation in depression
    characteristics, treatment, pregnancy etc
  • Randomized controlled trial design not available
  • ethical, medical, logistical challenges

6
Effects of Prenatal SRI exposure 3 key
(unanswered) questions
  • Are the effects of depression different from
    medication-depression (SSRI-D) exposure?
  • Does the timing of gestation exposure matter?
  • Can risk for congenital anomalies be separated
    from the risks associated with illness itself?

7
Linked Population-Health Data Studies
?
8
Population Level Research
  • Administrative health data on 119,547 live
    births over 39 months (1998-2001)
  • Linked Health Data
  • maternal prescriptions for SSRIs and other
    psychotropic medications
  • maternal medical records
  • birth outcome data
  • demographic data

9
1. Depression Vs SSRI effects (Oberlander,
Warburton et al 2006)
  • Compared neonatal outcomes between three mutually
    exclusive with prenatal exposure groups
  • SSRIs and Depression (SSRI-D)
  • (n 1,451 )
  • Depression only
  • (n 14,234)
  • Neither depression nor medication
  • (n 92,192)

10
Neonatal Outcomes Birth Weight
11
Neonatal Outcomes Respiratory Distress
12
Maternal CharacteristicsDiagnoses of depression
13
Maternal CharacteristicsDiagnoses of depression
14
Propensity Score Matching Outcomes Neonatal
Outcome Differences
15
Propensity Score Matching Outcomes Neonatal
Outcome Differences
16
Conclusions
  • Exposure to depression mattered, but SSRI-D
    exposure mattered more
  • Prenatal SSRI exposure (unmatched)
  • Lower birth weight
  • Shorten gestational age
  • Longer hospital stays
  • Increased incidence of respiratory distress
  • Using linked population health data and
    propensity score matching, prenatal SE-D
    exposure
  • increased risk for low birth weight and
    respiratory distress, even when accounting for
    maternal illness severity.

17
2. Effects of Timing (Oberlander, Warburton,
Hertzman et al in press)
  • Issues
  • Effects related to first vs third trimester
    exposure
  • Duration of exposure
  • Maternal illness severity

18
2. Effects of Timing (Oberlander et al in press)
1 P lt 0.05 for group differences
19
2. Effects of Timing (Oberlander et al in press)
20
2. Effects of Timing (Oberlander, Warburton,
Hertzman et al 2007)
  • Findings
  • Timing Controlling for maternal illness and
    duration of exposure
  • neonatal outcomes did not differ between LE and
    EE (pgt.05).
  • Length of Exposure Controlling for maternal
    illness characteristics
  • increasing the length of prenatal SRI exposure
    increased the risk for lower birth weight,
    respiratory distress and reduced gestational age
    (plt 0.05).

21
3. Risk for Congenital Anomalies (Oberlander,
Warburton, Hertzman et al 2007)
  • Background issues
  • Increased risk for major congenital anomalies and
    CHD
  • Increased first trimester dose
  • Conflicting evidence
  • Numbers of anomalies small in huge populations
  • Multiple confounding factors (age, smoking,
    parity, other teratogenic agents)

22
3. Risk for Congenital Anomalies (Oberlander,
Warburton, Hertzman et al 2007)
  • Polydrug exposure
  • Prenatal exposure to SRIs benzodiazepine
    an anticonvulsants
  • 2-fold to 4-fold increase in incidence of major
    congenital anomalies,
  • major cardiac anomalies - 15-fold increase in
    incidence, even when controlling for maternal
    illness characteristics.
  • Risk associated with SRI mono therapy did not
    increase over no exposure or no drug/no
    depression exposure.
  • Risk not associated with increased 1st trimester
    dose/day
  • Risks did not vary with maternal illness severity

23
Cohort Characteristics
24
Cohort Characteristics
25
Cohort Characteristics
26
Summary
  • Population-level linked health data
  • Summary of findings
  • Effects of illness differs from impact of
    medication
  • Duration of exposure gt influence than timing of
    exposure
  • Congenital Anomalies
  • Polydrug exposure differs from monodrug exposure
  • Medication dose does not influence risk
  • Addresses questions not easily answerable using
    cohort studies
  • Account for unmeasured but possibly confounding
    variables, where randomization can not occur
  • Highlight importance of SES and social context

27
HELPs Mission
  • To create, promote and apply new knowledge
    through leading interdisciplinary research to
    help children thrive.
  • Please visit HELPs website
  • www.earlylearning.ubc.ca
  • Sign up for HELPs Listserv. Find info on
    research projects, new publications and
    resources, maps, upcoming events, etc.

28
Background
  • Maternal depression
  • 10-20 of pregnancies
  • Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SRI) antidepressant
    medication
  • 5 of pregnancies (Oberlander, 2006)
  • Prenatal exposure associated with
  • reduced Apgar scores, reduced birth weight ,
    cluster of symptoms termed poor neonatal
    adaptation (PNA)
  • respiratory distress, increased motor tone, and
    feeding difficulties
  • 3rd trimester exposure gt 1st trimester exposure
  • Increased risk for congenital anomalies
  • FDA Health Canada warnings (2004)
  • Why do some infants experience adverse outcomes
    following prenatal exposure to SRI ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com