Title: Fauziah Md Taib and Chan Huan Chiang
1Human Capital Development
Role and Contributions of Private Higher
Education Institutions
- Fauziah Md Taib and Chan Huan Chiang
2Background
- Growing importance of human capital in knowledge
economy - Drastic Demand for Higher Education HE
- To improve access and equality
- Massification of Higher Education
- Private Higher Education PvHE absorbs the
excess demand from Public Universities - Globalization Effect
- Malaysia as Hub of Educational Excellence
- Growing number of foreign students
- Internationalization agenda
3What is Human Capital Development?
- Ultimate objective of economic development
- Enriching human lives
- Not just about material enrichment but to
increase the capabilities of people to lead full,
productive, satisfying lives. - Source Griffin and McKinley (1992)
4Human Capital Development Indicators
- Lead a long life (life expectancy at birth)
- Enjoy Good Health (Morbidity Rate)
- Access to accumulated stock of knowledge
(enrolment and literacy rates) - Sufficient income to buy food, clothing, shelter
and - To participate in decisions that directly affect
their lives and community - Live in peace and harmony (crime rate)
- People with soul
5Role of Tertiary Education
- Two competing roles
- Job Sieving Model (Technocracy)
- Positive Externality (Society and Culture, Values)
6Job Sieving Model (Technocracy)
- Building up skills to secure job (main objective)
- Employers use paper qualifications to sieve job
applicants, those without would not be
considered. - A person is equipped with skills and knowledge to
produce goods services for oneself - Counted as an aggregate becomes the sum of the
nations production (GDP) - Private gain
- 100 individual returns
- Private Investment
- Low investment result in low technocracy, vice
versa - Encourages Locked Door syndromes
7Positive Externality (Society,Culture,Values)
- HE as a means to get
- Behavioural change in desired direction
Behaviourist - Develop capacity and skills to learn better
Congnitivist - Become self actualised, autonomous Humanist
- Model new roles and behaviour Social Learning
- Construct Knowledge Constructivist
- Wholesome Society materialism spiritualism
New Sciences - Source Ashworth, Brennan, Egan, Hamilton and
Saenz (2008) - Returns to Society
- Public Investment
8Social Choice
- HE delivery system in any economy is the balance
between job sieving (p) and societal benefit role
(1-p). - A choice along the continuum is more appropriate
NOT a pure p or 1-p. - The ratio is effectively social choice
- Who should make the choice?
- Elected representatives on behalf of the society
9A Tough Choice
- The process of technocracy must also translate
into a more robust and wholesome society (people
with soul). - A society should not just become
- progressive in technocratic sense but also
- progressive in societal sense (necessary and
sufficient condition) - Achievement of only one aspect would cripple the
society - Technocracy alone Rich people but locked doors
- Scholarship alone Society loving folks but not
much technocracy learning
10Social Choice Examples
- The US model though seen as the epitome of
development is a very locked door community - Some examples of countries that have overcome
locked door society - Germany, Norway, Sweden and Finland
- High income levels, small population with
philosophy and culture play a big role in
schooling curriculum - Singapore American model but with high state
control
11Current Delivery Systems
- In Malaysia, currently there are dual systems of
delivery - 20 public universities
- Over 500 private universities
- Public universities are publicly financed
- Private universities are self financed
- Are they playing the same role?
- Should they be playing the same role?
12Contribution of Private HE (thus far)
- Since the suite of acts passed in 1996-1997
- New Education Act of 1996
- Private Higher Education Institutions Act 1996
- Private HE has become increasingly significant in
serving to complement Msia HE system,
particularly in terms of - Improving access to tertiary education
- Contributing to foreign exchange earnings
Malaysia as a hub of educational excellence
13Contribution Vs Role
14Role of Private Higher Education
- Essentially, What is the expected contribution
by the Private HE? - Should not be different than that of public HE.
- Goal is the same but the routes may be different
- Objective is to achieve wholesome society
(technocracy and people with soul) - Recap- Not just about material enrichment but to
increase the capabilities of people to lead full,
productive, satisfying lives.
15Common Complaints
- Poor race relation
- Poor soft skills
- Alarming crime rate
- Moral issues (Lack of Adab)
- Attitude problems
- Unethical people, compromised independence
Subprime Crisis, Enron, Fraudulent/ creative
Accounting - What is the source of the problem?
16Source of the Problem
- Old Science (Newtonian and Cartesian) Man is
machine, parts of a whole, etc. - The New Science Quantum Mechanics, Relativity
and Complexity Theories tell us that there are
no parts at all, that the world is all of a
piece, holistic. - Everything is interrelated, equilibrium is
elusive and fleeting. Small and even trivial
causes can have massive effects. (inseparable web
of relationships).
17Wholesome Society HE Role
- How to achieve it?
- Curriculum
- Teaching technocracy or skills Vs teaching
philosophy - How much of Private HE contents concurs with
philosophy?
18How Do We Produce Wholesome Society?
- Is the present curriculum wrong?
- Should it contain more philosophy, values based
contents? - Are we not doing it now?
- What else are still lacking?
- Present Problem
- Doing it just for the sake of LAN/MQA compliance?
- Implementation problems
- The heart does not present
19Proposed Solutions
- Elected representatives must make the choice on
behalf of society. - Once the social choice is decided (how much
component of technocracy and philosophy, soft
skills should be), - this would also determine the share of public
financing of the individuals higher education
20Financing of Societal Role
- Government should be funding the component for
societal role (philosophy and soft skills, 1-p). - Why?
- Students only want to pay for technocracy (p) so
that they can enter the job sieving market - Private HE providers reluctant to offer as it
adds to delivery costs - Force it!
- It becomes compliance issue students and PvHE
providers just go through the motion with little
emphasis and resources!
21Proposed Solutions
- Government uses tax money to pay for the teaching
of societal role (1-p) type courses in PvHE - The investment in societal benefits is NOT
subsidy but is viewed as buying the social
order - To live peacefully, everyone must pay
- Philosophy, soft skills type of courses are NOT
SUPPLEMENTARY But - CORE MATERIALS
- Aim To become and Intellectual Society NOT
Intelligent Society
22Proposed Solutions (cont)
- Any revamp must be on the basis of wholeness as
demonstrated by the new science paradigm
everything is interconnected. - Cannot treat technocracy and inculcation of the
fundamentals of philosophy in isolation. - Man is not machine (Le Mettrie, 1748)
- Not necessary additional budget but more through
reallocation of government public expenditures.
23Challenges
- Implementation
- The paradigm has to shift. Business not as
usual.. - 40,000 heart neuron has to accompany the
23,000,000 brain neuron to make an impact - Awareness for values, scholarship, ethics,
principles must be inculcated. - Demand must be created. Government to play the
marketing role too.
24How to Implement?
Approach
Objective
Suggestion
25Summary
- Human capital development strategy is a long hard
thinking process. - It starts with a strong foundation and holistic
perspective. - Short cuts, corner-cutting measures would not
result in a sustainable and successful
development. - Both public and private HE has to play the same
role in producing wholesome society together with
people with soul human with ADAB! - Government has to make the social choice (ratio
between technocracy and societal benefits) and
finance the latter part. - The societal benefits courses should become part
of the core curriculum NOT supplementary
26Thank You !