Title: Feedback from reporting systems
1Feedback from reporting systems
- Insights from a scoping study of methods of
providing feedback within an organisation in
England and Wales- 2004-6 - Wallace LM, Koutantji, M,BennJ, Spurgeon P,
Vincent C - DH Patient Safety Research Programme
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
2Rationale for focus on feedback learning
- UK Dept of Health report An Organisation with a
Memory (2000) - NHS does not actively learn from failures
- Existing systems take a long time to feed back
information and recommendations - There is little or no systematic follow-up of
recommendations - Recommended establishing reporting and learning
systems at local and national level.
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
3Rationale for focus on feedback learning
- National Audit Office survey1 Committee of
Public Accounts2 A Safer Place for Patients - emphasis on reporting and counting, but not on
analysis and learning - there is a need to improve sharing of solutions
by all organisations - lessons learnt on a local level are not widely
disseminated either within or between trusts - considerable complexity in reporting and feedback
channels currently exists (multiple agencies
responsible)
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
4PSRP Feedback Research Programme
Scoping review of feedback from safety
monitoring systems in health care and high risk
industries (Imperial College London)
- Requirements for effective safety feedback with
rationale - Model of feedback/control process for safety
monitoring systems
2. Expert Panel Review
1. Literature Review
Empirical studies of feedback systems in 351
trusts and 3 in-depth case studies (Coventry
University)
Expert Review Workshop with health care
professionals and domain experts
OUTPUT Design for effective safety feedback
systems for health care
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
5Safety issue management process
1. Detect
1. Incident report monitoring
2. Capture
3. Classify
4. Analyse
Iterate in ongoing cycle
2. Safety issue analysis
5. Prioritise
6. Investigate
7. Formulate
3.Solutions development systems improvement
8. Implement
9. Monitor
6Corrective action and safety information feedback
Improvements in the design of work systems
Identified system vulnerabilities
Safer Work Systems
SAFETY FEEDBACK Learning lessons from
operational experience
Information on operational risks
Increased awareness of front line staff
7OPERATIONAL LEVEL
LOCAL ORGANISATIONAL LEVEL
SUPRA- ORG. LEVEL
SAFETY ISSUE PROCESS
Incident reports
High-level and external reporting requirements
All classified incidents
Incident repository
1. Incident report monitoring
Single incidents priority issues identified for
follow-up
Aggregated data from multiple incidents
Local clinical work systems
2. Safety issue analysis
Corrective action loop
Care providers patients
Root causes, contributory factors and key trends
Integrate support changes
3.Solutions development systems improvement
Local implementing agents leadership
Systems improvements
8Reporting systems in expert panel
9Example feedback mechanisms from review of 23
best case health care reporting systems
- Staff bulletin board postings with safety issues
raised and actions taken (Holzmueller et al.,
2005 Lubomski et al., 2004) - Targeted staff training programmes (Takeda et
al., 2003) - Development of manuals on error prevention
(Wilf-Miron et al., 2003) - One-to-one telephone debriefings with reporters
(Wilf-Miron et al., 2003) - Departmental presentations and quality meetings
(Parke, 2003)
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
10Modes of feedback from incident reporting
Safety Action and Information Feedback from
Incident Reporting (SAIFIR) framework
1115 Requirements for effective feedback Examples
based on expert opinion
12Framework for Safety Action and Information
Feedback from Incident Reporting (SAIFIR)
13Survey of feedback learning in NHS trusts
- 351 trusts responded (out of all 607 English and
Welsh trusts contacted) 58 response rate - Administered between November 2005 and March 2006
- Respondent Local risk management leads
- Survey items
- Development of an open, no-blame culture
- Development and structure of local level
reporting systems - Analysis and use of information from incident
reports - Formulation and implementation of safety
solutions - Feedback mechanisms and methods of dissemination
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
14Comments on the SAIFIR model applied to UK NHS
- Not linear system-has to account for reporting by
observers, not always those involved in
incident, or can arise from other healthcare
services in pathway- unclear to whom feedback is
needed. - Filtering, and feedback occurs prior to
reporting- (Mode A) - Non Healthcare systems are more mature- can short
circuit some analysis by having standard
responses to known incident types as causes known
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
15Mode A acknowledgement, clarification,
categorisation
- UK NHS
- Only a third trusts acknowledge and inform re
incident handling. - Needs dialogue with reporter and affected staff-
e systems show promise
- Research-
- Pre-categorisation of incidents- does it deter
reporting/ lack detail?
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
16Mode B rapid response recovery prevention
actions
- UK NHS
- Little evidence of this occurring- and fear in
NHS of premature formulation and harmful action. - Would require systems to identify known incident
types and reliable actions.
- Research
- Experiments in rapid feedback are needed- using e
mail and other targeted means- analogue and field
experiments.
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
17Mode C Dissemination of learning
- UK NHS
- Limited effectiveness shown in survey reliance
on one way communication known to be ineffective
but most used. - Audit of newsletters- most use for alerts,
national guidance, not targeted feedback.
- Research
- Identifying common incident scenarios with known
causes- testing most effective methods of
communicating required actions, and uptake- eg by
requiring an implementation plan and triggers for
action.
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
18MODE D Outcome of incident investigation
- UK NHS
- 68 trusts communicate some information to
reports/ affected staff and these have only
modest levels of impact. - Wider sharing of outcomes (esp. causes and
solutions rather than incident types) required
within services , across trusts, within regions
and the national bodies (e.g. NPSA).
- Research
- Experiments on effective modes of feedback and
impact on intentions and actions re future
reporting and safety actions. Are vignettes more
effective, tan data reports?
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
19MODE E Implementing actions to improve safety
- UK NHS
- One third of trusts do not produce effective
guidelines as a result of incident reporting, and
25/351 had no system for monitoring if this was
implemented. - Recommended changes should be targeted,
actionable, monitored, in double loop learning.
- Research
- Using known methods of improving adherence to
guidance- test impact on safety behaviour and
reporting.
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions
20High level conclusions
- Attention must be given to the use of information
from incident reports to improve safety - There is a lack of evaluative evidence concerning
effective modes of feedback - There is wide variation in trusts practice in
terms of information and action feedback to front
line work systems - Little evidence of capacity for rapid action in
Trust systems - Little evaluation of impact of actions upon
operational safety - Feedback should be timely and targeted to
specific practitioners - Safety actions should be monitored and their
effectiveness evaluated
Applied Research Centre Health and Lifestyle
Interventions