Cognitive Processes PSY 334 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

Description:

Depth cues (texture gradient, stereopsis) where are edges in space? How are visual cues combined to form an image with depth? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: NAlva6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cognitive Processes PSY 334


1
Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334
  • Chapter 2 Perception

2
Marr
  • Depth cues (texture gradient, stereopsis) where
    are edges in space?
  • How are visual cues combined to form an image
    with depth?
  • 2-1/2 D sketch identifies where visual features
    are in relation to observer.
  • 3-D model refers to the representation of the
    objects in a scene.

3
Pattern Recognition
  • Classification and recognition occurs through
    processes of pattern recognition.
  • Bottom-up processes feature detection
  • Top-down processes -- conceptually driven
    processing

4
Object Recognition
  • Two stages
  • Early phase shapes and objects are extracted
    from background.
  • Later phase shapes and objects are categorized,
    recognized, named.

5
Disruptions of Perception
  • Visual agnosias impairment of ability to
    recognize objects.
  • Demonstrate that shape extraction and shape
    recognition are separate processes.
  • Apperceptive agnosia (lateral) problems with
    early processing (shape extraction).
  • Associative agnosia (bilateral) problems with
    later processing (recognition).
  • Prosopagnosia visual agnosia for faces.

6
Gestalt Priniciples
  • Wertheimer, Koffka, Kohler.
  • Form perception segregation of a display into
    objects and background.
  • Principles of perceptual organization allow us to
    see wholes (gestalts) formed of parts.
  • We do not recognize objects by identifying
    individual features.

7
Five Principles
  • Proximity
  • Similarity
  • Good continuation
  • Closure
  • Common fate
  • Elements that move together group together.
  • These will be on the midterm.

8
Examples
  • Gestalt principles of organization
  • Reversible figures
  • Stuart Anstis demos
  • http//psy.ucsd.edu/sanstis/SACamov.html
  • http//psy.ucsd.edu/sanstis/motion.html

9
Law of Pragnanz
  • Of all the possible interpretations, we will
    select the one that yields the simplest or most
    stable form.
  • Simple, symmetrical forms are seen more easily.
  • In compound letters, the larger figure dominates
    the smaller ones.

10
Visual Illusions
  • Depend on experience.
  • Influenced by culture.
  • Illustrate normal perceptual processes.
  • These are not errors but rather failures of
    perception in unusual situations.

11
Visual Pattern Recognition
  • Bottom-up approaches
  • Template-matching
  • Feature analysis
  • Recognition by components

12
Template-Matching
  • A retinal image of an object is compared directly
    to stored patterns (templates).
  • The object is recognized as the template that
    gives the best match.
  • Used by computers to recognize patterns.
  • Evidence shows human recognition is more flexible
    than template-matching
  • Size, place, orientation, shape, blurred or
    broken (ambiguous or degraded items easily
    recognized by people.

13
Feature Analysis
  • Stimuli are combinations of elemental features.
  • Features are recognized and combined.
  • Features are like output of edge detectors.
  • Features are simpler, so problems of orientation,
    size, etc., can be solved.
  • Relationships among features are specified to
    define the pattern.

14
Evidence for Feature Analysis
  • Confusions people make more errors when letters
    presented at brief intervals contain similar
    features
  • G misclassified as C (21), as O (6), as B (1),
    as 9 (1)
  • When a retinal image is held constant, the parts
    of the object disappear
  • Whole features disappear.
  • The remaining parts form new patterns.

15
Object Recognition
  • Biedermans recognition-by-components
  • Parts of the larger object are recognized as
    subobjects.
  • Subobjects are categorized into types of geons
    geometric ions.
  • The larger object is recognized as a pattern
    formed by combining geons.
  • Only edges are needed to recognize geons.

16
Tests of Biedermans Theory
  • Object recognition should be mediated by
    recognition of object components.
  • Two types of degraded figures presented for brief
    intervals
  • Components (geons) missing
  • Line segments missing
  • At fast intervals (65-100 ms) subjects could not
    recognize components when segments were missing.

17
Speech Recognition
  • The physical speech signal is not broken up into
    parts that correspond to recognizable units of
    speech.
  • Undiminished sound energy at word boundaries
    gaps are illusory.
  • Cessation of speech energy in the middle of
    words.
  • Word boundaries cannot be heard in an unfamiliar
    language.

18
Phoneme Perception
  • No one-to-one letter-to-sound correspondence.
  • Speech is continuous phonemes are not discrete
    (separate) but run together.
  • Speakers vary in how they produce the same
    phoneme.
  • Coarticulation phonemes overlap.
  • The sound produced depends on the sound
    immediately preceding it.

19
Feature Analysis of Speech
  • Features of phonemes appear to be
  • Consonantal feature (consonant vs vowel).
  • Voicing do vocal cords vibrate or not.
  • Place of articulation where the vocal track is
    constricted (where is tongue placed).
  • The phoneme heard by listeners changes as you
    vary these features.
  • Sounds with similar features are confused.

20
Categorical Perception
  • For speech, perception does not change
    continuously but abruptly at a category boundary.
  • Categorical perception failure to perceive
    gradations among stimuli within a category.
  • Pairs of bs or ps sound alike despite
    differing in voice-onset times.

21
Two Views of Categorical Perception
  • Weak view stimuli are grouped into recognizable
    categories.
  • Strong view we cannot discriminate among items
    within such a category.
  • Massaro people can discriminate within category
    but have a bias to same items are the same
    despite differences.
  • Category boundaries can be shifted by fatiguing
    the feature detectors.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com