Title Page Product Development Title - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Title Page Product Development Title

Description:

Simone Youngblood Defense Modeling and Simulation Office (DMSO) ... Standards, not statics. Don't develop a standard unless you mean it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: orlt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Title Page Product Development Title


1
Priorities for MS Standards
Panelists
Euro-SIW 17 June 2003
Dr. Andrew Vallerand DND Synthetic Environment
Coordination Office Dilys Grant QinetiQ Björn
Möller Pitch Kunskapsutveckling AB Simone
Youngblood Defense Modeling and Simulation
Office (DMSO) Gunnar Öhlund Defence Materiel
Administration (FMV)
A Distinguished panel of experts from government,
industry, and academia.
2
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June 03
Andrew L. Vallerand Ph.D.
  • Panelist Biography
  • Dr Vallerand is H/DND Synthetic Environment
    Coordination office, a Defence Scientist, member
    of SISO, SCS, Aerospace Medical Association and
    co-Chair of SISO-Canada.
  • Perspective on Standards
  • In general, DND, and specifically SISO Canada
    will NOT develop NEW standards
  • In general we will not lead but implement
    established standards, which are supported by
    Allies and the related published evidence,
    benefits, business case.
  • Role and Relationship to Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Started to get organized, in terms of empowering
    our DND MS Executive Agents to be part of such
    Stds Dev Org.on behalf of DND.

3
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Andrew L. Vallerand Ph.D.
  • Standards Priorities
  • Data management and standard data formats
  • SNE, Dynamic SNE and SEDRIS
  • Model Driven Architecture or s/w design for
    Reusability
  • Composability without compromising
    interoperability, commonality, reusability and
    evolvability
  • Access to or development of Published Case
    Studies documenting the ROI of standards or Best
    Practices in MS /SE.

4
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Dilys Grant
  • Panelist Biography
  • Employed by QinetiQ, formerly DERA, the UK
    defence research agency, now privatised
  • A software engineer/scientist now managing ODIN,
    the UK MOD model of choice for underwater warfare
    modelling.
  • Perspective on Standards
  • Essential for co-operative effective quality
    modelling
  • In practice, do we use them?
  • Are they cost effective?
  • Role and Relationship to Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Personally, none!

5
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Dilys Grant
  • Standards Priorities
  • Definition standards are evolving guidelines
    that, when followed, permit the highest quality
    of Modelling and Simulation
  • Modelling and Simulation Objective an available,
    adaptable, affordable, usable toolset to
    effectively model the application of interest
  • Problems encountered interfacing to other models
  • understanding the capability different
    documentation, methodologies, etc
  • architecture
  • systems computer platform, operating system,
    language
  • units
  • change control of items that effect the interface
  • Standards priorities
  • ways to avoid these problems
  • effective information exchange -
    interface/communications/interactions
  • Standards have to be readable, understandable,
    usable,

6
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June 03
Björn Möller
  • Panelist Biography
  • Vice President of Pitch AB, MSc in Computer
    Science and Engineering, 25 years in advanced
    software development in various positions
  • Perspective on Standards
  • Vendor and consultants on standards based
    products
  • European/International
  • Multi-industry
  • MS integral part of mainstream computing
  • Role and Relationship to Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Active in SISO IEEE (papers, working groups,
    etc)
  • Implementing SISO and IEEE standards
  • We are all users of standards directly and
    indirectly

7
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Björn Möller
  • Standards Priorities
  • Broader international perspective in standards
    development
  • Reach into more domains than defense
  • Exchange goals, requirements, current standards,
    experiences and ideas
  • Harmonize with commercial standards and
    environments
  • Example XML
  • Standards for both technology and methodology
  • Standards that can be verified
  • Standards from other angles
  • Examples robustness, fault-tolerance,
    performance
  • Ensure both long-term viability and short-term
    practical usefulness
  • Standardize the right things

8
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Simone Youngblood
  • Panelist Biography
  • Simone Youngblood is a member of the Principal
    Professional Staff at the Johns Hopkins
    University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL)
    and has served for more than 6 years as the DoD
    VVA focal point in her position as DMSO's VVA
    Technical Director.
  • Perspective on Standards
  • Know what you mean by standard
  • Standards are necessary, but not sufficient
  • Develop for the largest viable community
  • Standards, not statics
  • Dont develop a standard unless you mean it
  • Role and Relationship to Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Responsible for DoD policy and guidance for VVA
  • Submitting a proposal for a product group under
    SISO
  • Chairing a group developing a NATO standard on
    VVA of federations

9
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Simone Youngblood
  • Standards Priorities
  • Specifications for reuse
  • Metadata requirements
  • Validation Process Maturity Model
  • Best practices
  • Framework for VVA of federations
  • Conceptual model elements
  • Fidelity decomposition

10
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
Gunnar Öhlund
  • Panelist Biography
  • Head of Design, SBA at The Swedish Defence
    Materiel Administration (FMV) Systems Engineering
    department. Responsible for MS RD activities
    also involved in writing the Swedish Armed Forces
    MS Masterplan. Twenty years of experience from
    the defense industry.
  • Perspective on Standards
  • Very important as a tool for achieving
    interoperability and reuse.
  • Not just technical standards. fx. design
    principles need to be standardized.
  • Downside is, it takes time and politics and
    procedure might be involved in a negative way.
  • Role and Relationship to Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Personally a member of INCOSE, SISO and IEEE.
  • FMVs active in SSI (Swedish Standards
    Institute), CEN (Committee Europe de
    Normalisasion), ISO (International
    Standardisation Org.) and thru PfP STANAG.

11
"Priorities for MS StandardsTuesday, 17 June
2003
  • Standards Priorities
  • Synthetic Environment.
  • SNE (Natural Environment).
  • TSE (Human behavior, individual and
    organizational).
  • Infrastructure.
  • Collaborative Environment.
  • PDM (Product Data Models).
  • EDM (Enterprise Data Models).
  • Principles for modeling.
  • Business
  • Physical (bodily) representation.
  • Behavior, booth human and organizational but also
    the laws of nature.
  • Fx. how to separate the physical behavior from
    the tactical behavior in a model.

Gunnar Öhlund
The overall importance is to standardize
principles and design patterns not just
technology.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com