Title: Superannuation Splitting
1Superannuation Splitting
- Tricia Peters
- PetersMcKeown Pty Ltd
- March 2008
2Agenda
- Superannuation what is it?
- Superannuation and family law
- Valuations - where are we after CC?
- Orders/agreements
- Splitting superannuation JMRBAR
- Summary
3What is superannuation
- A tax-effective retirement savings vehicle
- Different types of superannuation funds
- Accumulation funds
- Public offer funds
- Employer funds
- Industry funds
- Defined benefit funds
- Self managed superannuation funds
4Superannuation - size
- As at 30 June 2007, funds invested in
superannuation reached 1.15 trillion
5Super statistics (30/6/2006)
6Superannuation Regulations
- Legislation
- Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act and
Regulations - Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA)
- Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA)
- Regulatory bodies
- APRA complying superannuation funds
- ATO self managed funds
- Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
- Fund trust deed
7Superannuation and family law
- New super splitting rules from 28/12/2002
- Limited powers
- Access to member superannuation details for
non-member spouse mainly for valuation purposes - Court can split or flag a super interest or can
be done by a BFA
8Valuations
- Required for consent and Court orders where
superannuation is split - Not required for superannuation agreement
- Method of valuation specified in the FLSR for
accumulation and defined benefit funds but not
for SMSFs
9Valuations
- Clarified in CC
- Superannuation must be valued at the first step
either by - statutory method in FLSR if it is to be split, or
- by other means if super is not going to be split
10What is a valuation under FLSR?
- Accumulation fund
- Valuation provided by a trustee on a SIF, via
Form 6 process - Member statement
- Defined benefit fund
- Valuation using the formulas in FLSR
- Cant use member statement
- Only necessary when it is to be split
11How is a valuation obtained
- Form 6
- Superannuation Information Form
- Simple but
- Which fund?
- Which trustee?
- Where to send?
- How much?
12Where are we after CC (2005 FamCA1223)
- Superannuation to be treated in the same way as
property (even if it is not property), either on
the list of assets or on a separate list other
specie - Superannuation to be valued at Step 1 regardless
of whether splitting or not - Contributions of the parties to the
superannuation must be assessed - Superannuation to be considered in the light of
any s75(2) factors and in the overall fairness
and equity of the orders - Superannuation can be assessed either on a global
or asset by asset basis
13What value to use when?
- Must use value under Regulations if super is to
be split - Any agreed value can be used if no split
- May be more appropriate not to use Regulations
value if super is to be offset - Need to consider the likely timing of retirement
or resignation
14Flagging order/agreement
- A flag can be put on a superannuation interest by
order or agreement - Trustee cannot make a payment to member while
flag is in place - Flag can be lifted by order or agreement
- Designed to be used when retirement is close
15Splitting order/agreement
- Court can order that an interest be split
- Order must include either a base amount or -
cannot be a formula or any other means of
calculating the amount to split - Agreements can include a base amount, a split,
or a means of calculating the amount to be split
16When does the split take place?
- At the discretion the trustee can either
- Clean break ie pay funds over to non-member
spouse, usually via their nominated
superannuation fund - Piggy back funds are not paid over to
non-member spouse until member takes his/her
benefit - Usually clean break only a few funds piggy
back
17Impact of splitting order
- Super splitting so far has focused on
- Valuing defined benefit interests
- How to treat superannuation
- Should the super be split how much?
- How to deal with lifetime pensions
- Little focus on the impact of any split on the
parties interests going forward - BAR and JMR
18BAR and JMR (2005 FamCA 386)
- 13 years cohabitation separated for 8 years at
date of hearing - Interim settlement in 1998 super matters
pending - Husband a member of ESSS for some 30 years
small ESSPlan interest - ESSS valued at 403,810 resignation value
534,085 (130,275 difference)
19Issues of concern
- Discounting of value based on retirement at age
65 - Salary for valuation purposes was 4,000 below
current salary - Applicable tax rate and changing fund structure
- Pattern of increase in ABM contributions
- Expert expressed concern about valuation
20Issues of concern (contd)
- Young J decided the court had to make a
determination rather than a valuation - Determined to split the superannuation at time of
retirement - More certainty and eliminates the inequities
inherent in the valuation - Wife will share in increase in fund enjoy the
benefits of the generous provisions of this
particular Fund
21Contribution
- West and Green method not appropriate
- Greater contribution during period of marriage
(32 increase in ABM pa) than post separation
(10pa) - Wife entitled to 10 of super fund (may be after
taking into account a previous payment of 44,800
by the husband) - Plus 20-25 for 75(2) factors
- Wife to receive 35 of final benefit
22Analysis of the outcome
- Assumptions used
- No additional voluntary contributions
- No further promotions
- Salary to increase by CPI (est 3.5pa)
- AWOTE (est 4.5pa)
- Retirement at age 60 (9 years time)
- Return on market investments is 7pa
23How final benefit is calculated
- FAS X ABM
- At hearing
- 85,712.50 x 6.226 533,646
- At retirement (age 60)
- 116,817 x 7.126 832,440
- (An increase of between 5.15 and 4.95pa)
- Wife to receive 291,354 (35)
24Immediate split impact on member account
- The wife would receive a roll over to a fund of
her choice (presumably 35 of 403,810
141,334) - ESSS would set up a contra account against the
husbands superannuation - Contra account will increase by AWOTE2.5
(currently 6) - Member has a growing debt against his account
that comes off final benefit
25Projected outcome in 9 years time
26What to look out for
- Members who have a long membership, 20 years
- Members who have little promotional opportunity
- Members aged 45
27What is the problem?
- Maximum ABM ESSS 7.5 (previously 8.4)
- Once max ABM reached, increases in benefit only
by way of salary increase, eg 3-3.5pa - If there has been a superannuation split, the
contra account continues to grow at AWOTE2.5,
eg 6 - 7.8, ie more than the growth in the
superannuation interest
28The orders in BAR and JMR
- A percentage splitting order under 90MT(1)(b) of
35 - A flagging order under S 90MU of the Family Law
Act - The trustee is prevented from making a clean
break split to the wife until the flag is lifted,
this will not be until the husband retires - Note requirement for a splittable payment
becoming payable soon not addressed in the
judgement
29Issues addressed in recent appeals
- MM (2006 FamCA 193), DJAJ (2006 FamCA 961)
- Three main issues in cases where there is a
substantial superannuation interest in the
payment phase - How to assess non members contribution
- What value to put on the superannuation
- How to make orders that are fair and equitable to
both parties
30Issues
- When do you need a valuation?
- Should you flag, split or offset?
- When will the non-member get control of the
superannuation? - What is the impact on the members account?
- When can the parties access their super?
- Any tax implications?
- Pension income streams? A big problem for
another day!
31Conclusion
- Superannuation a growing family asset
- Valuation issues clearer after CC
- Defined benefit funds continue to be problematic
- Help is available