Best Practices: HIVSyphilis Partner Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Best Practices: HIVSyphilis Partner Services

Description:

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Traditional PN ... Syphilis case or serology per reactor grid. Pregnant w/ any STD. New HIV. HIV w/ STD ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: ccl45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Best Practices: HIVSyphilis Partner Services


1
Best Practices HIV/Syphilis Partner Services
  • Peter R. Kerndt, MD, MPH
  • Director, Sexually Transmitted Disease Program
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health

2
Traditional PN approaches
  • Provider Disclosure
  • Health department (DIS\PHI)
  • Clinician or case manager
  • Patient (Self) Disclosure
  • Dual Disclosure
  • Client Provider
  • Contract Disclosure
  • Client Provider

3
Barriers\Challenges to PN\PS
  • CDC guidelines
  • POGs vs. PCRS PN vs. PS
  • Data systems
  • STD MIS PEMS eHARS local reporting and case
    management systems
  • Resources
  • Personnel
  • Training
  • Community perception
  • Normative vs. cohesive

4
Priority for PS
  • Acute HIV Infection
  • Syphilis case or serology per reactor grid
  • Pregnant w/ any STD
  • New HIV
  • HIV w/ STD

5
(No Transcript)
6
Reasons for PCRS Administrative Closure2000 -
2006 (N2620)
  • N
  • Unable to Locate 1211 46.2
  • Insufficient Information 289 11.0
  • Unable to Interview (too ill) 351 13.4
  • Deceased 147 5.6
  • Previously Worked Case 264 10.1
  • Management Decision 159 6.1
  • Time factor gt 2 years 172 6.6
  • Unknown reason 27 1.0

7
(No Transcript)
8
Follow-up of 1016 Initiated Partners962 (94.7)
were counseled 650 (69.6) were eligible for
HIV testing
9
Partner Follow-up
  • 1016 partners followed-up
  • 962 located (95) and counseled
  • 32 already HIV
  • 8 new positives of those located (79/962)
  • 387 tested (40)
  • 20 new positives of those tested (79/387)
  • 41 new positives were previous negative (32/79)
  • 59 new positives were not previous tested
    (47/79)
  • 80 were negatives of those tested (308/389)

10
HIV Tested Partners, 2000 -2006, (N387)
11
PCRS Partner Referrals, 2000 - 2006 (N3845)
12
Percent of ES Cases that Named gt1 Partner, Los
Angeles County, 2005 (N1282)
Source LAC Department of Public Health Sexually
Transmitted Disease Program
13
Percent of ES Cases that Named gt1 Partner by
Gender, Los Angeles County, 2005, (N1282)
14
Percent of ES Cases that Named gt1 Partner by
Race, Los Angeles County, 2005, (N1282)
1 cases (Am Ind/Alas. Nat.) , 3 cases (Mixed)
and 54 (unknown race/ethnicity) are excluded
because of small number
15
Percent of ES Cases that Named gt1 Partner by
Sexual Orientation, Los Angeles County, 2005,
(N1282)
3 cases were WSMW and are excluded because of
small number
16
Percent of ES Cases that Named gt1 Partner by HIV
Status, Los Angeles County, 2005, (N1282)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
How Do Patients Feel About Health Department PCRS
Provider Disclosure?
  • Golden et.al. JAIDS 32 196-202 2003 Seattle
    surveyed persons w/recently reported HIV
  • 84 Agreed (somewhat/strongly) the health
    department should routinely offer everyone
  • diagnosed with HIV help in notifying
  • their partners
  • 20 Would want help notifying at least one
  • partner from the last six months

20
Newer PS approaches
  • Internet-based approaches
  • Self notification or internet partners
  • Public health (DIS) notification of internet
    partners w/ or w/o prior index notification
  • PS based in community organizations
  • Howard Brown Model
  • Peer driven clustering

21
Internet-based PS approaches
  • JAMA 2000 SF Klausner, et al
  • AOL chat room notification after link to a
    syphilis cluster
  • MMWR 2004 Los Angeles County
  • Case notifies 13/16 partners w/ 7 responses
  • DIS notifies 111/134 partners w/ 29 responses

22
Internet-based PS approaches
  • Online self notification
  • www.Inspot.org

23
(No Transcript)
24
www.inSPOTLA.org
  • Potentially important tool to interrupt
    transmission
  • Promotes STD and HIV testing and treatment
  • Promotes connection to community agencies and
    services

25
InSPOTLA.org
  • More than 60 clinics and other agencies listed as
    testing and resource referrals
  • Mutual benefit to agencies
  • Increase linkage to agency website
  • Increase clinic referrals
  • Promote special agency services (e.g., rapid HIV
    testing)
  • Enhance patient benefits

26
www.inSPOTLA.org Usage, 2006
27
InSPOTLA Website Usage Statistics May
December 2006 (average)
  • Avg. site visits per day 152 (104-221)
  • E-cards sent per month 392
  • Recipients per e-card 1.6
  • Click-throughs per month 162 (25 avg.)
  • Sent anonymously 85
  • Sent w/ personal message 77

28
Percent e-cards Sent, by Disease, Dec 2005- Dec
2006
29
Syphilis PS based in a CBO The Howard Brown
ModelGreatzer, Beau et al, CDC STD Prev Conf
2006
  • Study population, 2002-03
  • 232 early syphilis cases were included in the
    analysis
  • CDPH investigated 108 (46.6) cases
  • HB investigated 124 (53.4) cases
  • No significant differences in total cases,
    demographics, or stage of disease

30
Syphilis case results CDPH\Howard Brown
  • Lost to follow-up (coded as 999)
  • CDPH 43/108 cases (39.8)
  • HB 6/124 cases (4.8)
  • plt0.01
  • Time from treatment to interview for cases not
    lost to follow-up, in median number of days
  • CDPH 26 days
  • HB 1 day

31
Partner Elicitation Results CDPH\Howard Brown
  • Cases with at least one partner elicited
  • CDPH 29/108 (26.9)
  • HB 63/124 (50.8)
  • plt0.01
  • Total partners elicited 191
  • CDPH 50 (26.2)
  • HB 141 (73.8)
  • plt0.01
  • Partner index (elicited partners/cases assigned)
  • CDPH 0.463
  • HB 1.14

32
Conclusions
  • PS identifies persons that have not received
    HIV/STD counseling and testing services
  • PS identifies persons with previously undetected
    HIV infection
  • PS creates opportunities for linking HIV infected
    to care
  • PS provides opportunities for accessing
    previously diagnosed, high-risk, HIV-positive
    persons for referral into prevention case
    management
  • PS encourages/supports HIV-negative partners to
    change risky behaviors

33
Conclusions
  • PS is an important component of PH response
  • Integrated systems that provide PS are likely to
    be most effective
  • Innovative strategies that use new technologies
    will be required to reach subpopulations
  • CBO-based PS may increase the number of contacts
    identified and the timeliness of referral to
    treatment
  • CBO-based PS may increase community support for PS

34
Peter R. Kerndt, MD, MPHDirector, Sexually
Transmitted Disease ProgramLos Angeles County
Department of Public Healthwww.lapublichealth.org
/std (213) 744-3093pkerndt_at_ph.lacounty.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com