Title: Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training
1Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training
2Agenda for the day 830 AM - 430 PM
- - opening remarks
- - introduction
- - wildlife tree retention
- - review principles of OGMA delineation
- - case studies
3Purpose of training
- To learn how to use the LUPG to maximize the
benefits to biodiversity within the timber supply
impact cap - to understand the technical procedures for
delineating OGMAs - to review changes to wildlife tree retention
calculations and implementation
4Who is involved in LU planning?
- lead the process government (MOF MELP)
- contribute information agencies, industry,
ENGOs, others - compile information, delineate OGMAs prepare
draft LU objectives MELP MOF district planners - review comment public, tenure-holders,
interest groups, First Nations - establish objectives DM DEO (the SDMs)
- implement licensees, Small Business Program
5Why are we managing for biodiversity?
- To maintain the diversity of plants, animals and
other living organisms in all their forms and
levels of organization - Maintain ecosystem integrity and function
- Essential to achieve sustainability of forest
resource - significant conservation provisions in
the FPC - Signatory to the Biodiversity Convention
6Key principles of biodiversity conservation
- Maintain biodiversity at a variety of levels that
are linked (prov, regional, landscape, stand) - Maintain habitat diversity as a surrogate to
maintain biodiversity - The more managed forests resemble forests created
by natural disturbances the higher the likelihood
of maintaining native species and ecological
processes
7Why is old growth retention a priority?
- Old growth ecosystems are becoming scarcer - thus
old growth species and ecosystems are most at
risk of loss - Old growth is the most difficult seral stage to
recreate or manage
8Why is old growth retention a priority?
(practical benefits)
- Certainty regarding operating areas
- Improve standing timber inventory through
elimination of interim measures once OGMAs in
place
9Why is wildlife tree retention a priority?
- Retention of stand structure is fundamental to
maintaining biodiversity - Need to have consistent and appropriate landscape
unit objectives to ensure a sound legal basis - Landscape objectives for WTR reduce stand level
only requirements
10Principles Governing the Development of LUPG
- Must be focused on elements that are most at risk
- Must be operationally feasible
- Must provide the best biological management
within the policy limits set by government
11Approach to maintaining biodiversity in the LUPG
- To maintain viable, representative old growth
forest ecosystems well distributed across their
natural range through old growth objectives - To maintain important stand structure through WTR
objectives
12(No Transcript)
13Planning Framework - HLP portion of a plan
regional plan
LRMP
other operational plans
landscape unit plans
forest development plan
consistency requirement
lu objectives higher level plan
- HLP is only that portion of a plan that must be
implemented through operational plans
14Higher level plans
RMZ objective
Landscape Unit objective
Sensitive Area objective
Recreation Sites Trails objective
15Function and context of the LUPG
- Goal of the LUPG is to deliver maximum
biodiversity conservation within the Code
framework by - following Chief Forester direction in accordance
with legislation - staying within FPC timber supply impact cap
(February 1996) - complying with government policy
16Function and context of the LUPG (contd)
- LUPG consolidates previous direction and is used
along with ch 5 HLP PP - focusing on two priority biodiversity objectives
- layout management controls
17Management controls process controls
- RLUPS RLUPS review
- Completion of LU training prior to legal
establishment - The requirement to comply with the Guide
- District, Regional and Headquarters working
groups - Timber Supply review and associated sensitivity
analysis
18Management controlspriority biodiversity
- Priority biodiversity elements - Must do
- Old growth retention (OGMAs) Wildlife tree
retention (WTR) (see detail in OG WT Retention
sections) - Non priority biodiversity and other forest
resources - May do - where RMZ HLP directs or through draft
objectives -
19Management controls Managing Timber Supply
Impacts
- Timber supply impacts capped
- Rules based approach
- Table 2.8 - checks district use of THLB
- Decision made 2 priority biodiversity elements
get the impact budget - Other values/attributes can be accommodated in
OGMAs but no additional impact budget unless RMZ
HLP
20Landscape Unit Planning Timelines
- March 1999
- June/July 1999
- September 1999
-
- LUPG released
- Data workshops delivered
- RLUPS review completed
21Landscape Unit Planning Timelines
- Winter 2000
- January 2000 to July 2002
- Training delivered to staff
- Priority objectives established
22Successful Implementation Depends On
- Clear understanding of the LUPG
- balancing biological considerations within
policy framework - Partnership and commitment among government,
industry and environmental community - Willingness to work within management controls