Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training

Description:

To learn how to use the LUPG to maximize the benefits to biodiversity within the ... Old growth is the most difficult seral stage to recreate or manage. 8 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: ilmbg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training


1
Landscape Unit Planning Guide Training
2
Agenda for the day 830 AM - 430 PM
  • - opening remarks
  • - introduction
  • - wildlife tree retention
  • - review principles of OGMA delineation
  • - case studies

3
Purpose of training
  • To learn how to use the LUPG to maximize the
    benefits to biodiversity within the timber supply
    impact cap
  • to understand the technical procedures for
    delineating OGMAs
  • to review changes to wildlife tree retention
    calculations and implementation

4
Who is involved in LU planning?
  • lead the process government (MOF MELP)
  • contribute information agencies, industry,
    ENGOs, others
  • compile information, delineate OGMAs prepare
    draft LU objectives MELP MOF district planners
  • review comment public, tenure-holders,
    interest groups, First Nations
  • establish objectives DM DEO (the SDMs)
  • implement licensees, Small Business Program

5
Why are we managing for biodiversity?
  • To maintain the diversity of plants, animals and
    other living organisms in all their forms and
    levels of organization
  • Maintain ecosystem integrity and function
  • Essential to achieve sustainability of forest
    resource - significant conservation provisions in
    the FPC
  • Signatory to the Biodiversity Convention

6
Key principles of biodiversity conservation
  • Maintain biodiversity at a variety of levels that
    are linked (prov, regional, landscape, stand)
  • Maintain habitat diversity as a surrogate to
    maintain biodiversity
  • The more managed forests resemble forests created
    by natural disturbances the higher the likelihood
    of maintaining native species and ecological
    processes

7
Why is old growth retention a priority?
  • Old growth ecosystems are becoming scarcer - thus
    old growth species and ecosystems are most at
    risk of loss
  • Old growth is the most difficult seral stage to
    recreate or manage

8
Why is old growth retention a priority?
(practical benefits)
  • Certainty regarding operating areas
  • Improve standing timber inventory through
    elimination of interim measures once OGMAs in
    place

9
Why is wildlife tree retention a priority?
  • Retention of stand structure is fundamental to
    maintaining biodiversity
  • Need to have consistent and appropriate landscape
    unit objectives to ensure a sound legal basis
  • Landscape objectives for WTR reduce stand level
    only requirements

10
Principles Governing the Development of LUPG
  • Must be focused on elements that are most at risk
  • Must be operationally feasible
  • Must provide the best biological management
    within the policy limits set by government

11
Approach to maintaining biodiversity in the LUPG
  • To maintain viable, representative old growth
    forest ecosystems well distributed across their
    natural range through old growth objectives
  • To maintain important stand structure through WTR
    objectives

12
(No Transcript)
13
Planning Framework - HLP portion of a plan
regional plan
LRMP
other operational plans
landscape unit plans
forest development plan
consistency requirement
lu objectives higher level plan
  • HLP is only that portion of a plan that must be
    implemented through operational plans

14
Higher level plans
RMZ objective
Landscape Unit objective
Sensitive Area objective
Recreation Sites Trails objective
15
Function and context of the LUPG
  • Goal of the LUPG is to deliver maximum
    biodiversity conservation within the Code
    framework by
  • following Chief Forester direction in accordance
    with legislation
  • staying within FPC timber supply impact cap
    (February 1996)
  • complying with government policy

16
Function and context of the LUPG (contd)
  • LUPG consolidates previous direction and is used
    along with ch 5 HLP PP
  • focusing on two priority biodiversity objectives
  • layout management controls

17
Management controls process controls
  • RLUPS RLUPS review
  • Completion of LU training prior to legal
    establishment
  • The requirement to comply with the Guide
  • District, Regional and Headquarters working
    groups
  • Timber Supply review and associated sensitivity
    analysis

18
Management controlspriority biodiversity
  • Priority biodiversity elements - Must do
  • Old growth retention (OGMAs) Wildlife tree
    retention (WTR) (see detail in OG WT Retention
    sections)
  • Non priority biodiversity and other forest
    resources - May do
  • where RMZ HLP directs or through draft
    objectives

19
Management controls Managing Timber Supply
Impacts
  • Timber supply impacts capped
  • Rules based approach
  • Table 2.8 - checks district use of THLB
  • Decision made 2 priority biodiversity elements
    get the impact budget
  • Other values/attributes can be accommodated in
    OGMAs but no additional impact budget unless RMZ
    HLP

20
Landscape Unit Planning Timelines
  • March 1999
  • June/July 1999
  • September 1999
  • LUPG released
  • Data workshops delivered
  • RLUPS review completed

21
Landscape Unit Planning Timelines
  • Winter 2000
  • January 2000 to July 2002
  • Training delivered to staff
  • Priority objectives established

22
Successful Implementation Depends On
  • Clear understanding of the LUPG
  • balancing biological considerations within
    policy framework
  • Partnership and commitment among government,
    industry and environmental community
  • Willingness to work within management controls
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com