Title: Moderator:
1Moderator Jerome E. Mason, MCR.h, SLCR Panel
Members Knydel Bennett Cherokee Investment
Partners Cynthia Petrozzello Brownfields
Redevelopment,Connecticut Brownfield John Paul
Connecticut Brownfields Redevelopment
Authority Bruce-Sean Reshen CEO, MGP Partners
LLC
2Environmentally Challenged Properties
3Environmentally Challenged Properties
- Moderators Key Learning Points
- Owners no longer needs to clean up all
contamination on sites they can instead contain
the contamination using risk-based method to save
time and money - Property owners have new obligations and new
protections when selling contaminated sites - Under the Brownfields Act of 2001, sellers
qualify for liability protection provided they
maintain the integrity of a sites land use and
engineering controls post-closure - Sellers can greatly enhance the safety of selling
contaminated sites by utilizing a neutral third
party not-for-profit trust to provide for the
long-term stewardship of such sites
4Environmentally Challenged Properties
- A New Paradigm
- Bruce-Sean Reshen
- Chief Executive Officer
- The MGP Group
5Dig and Haul A Paradigm That Didnt Work
- Rationale Post Love Canal Clean Every
Scintilla of Dirt - Result
- Prohibitive Expense
- Technological Impracticability
- Legal Gridlock
- Paralysis of the Cleanup Process
- Impact on Real Estate
- Exacerbation of Community Blight
- Warehousing of Contaminated Properties
6The Dawn of Reality - Risk Based Closure
- The Brownfields Agenda - The Art of Compromise
- Remediation should be based on reuse
- Residential vs. Industrial/Commercial Cleanup
- Development of Multiple Cleanup Standards
- Linkage of Remediation to Redevelopment
-
7Forever Is A Long Time Post Closure
- Risk Based Closures are not the end of the
process - Contamination still remains
- Use of Engineering Controls (ECs) and Land Use
Controls (LUCs) to Ensure Safety of Site and
Protection of Human Health - Focus on Design, Implementation and Maintenance
of Controls on a Long-Term Basis - Need to Provide for Reporting to Stakeholders and
Information Management
8A New Structure for A New Reality
- Risk Based Closure and the Sale of Real Estate
- Need for A New Market Structure to
- Ensure Protection of Human Health
- Provide Market Support for Transactions
- New Market Structure Must
- Engage the Support of All Stakeholders
- Be Economically Feasible
- Provide Long-Term Financial Assurance
9The Role of The Guardian Trust
- The Guardian Trust services
- Inspections of sites and land use records
- Monitoring of sites, land use changes and
building permits - Reporting to prescribed stakeholders
- Providing financial assurance for long-term
stewardship - Utilizing a comprehensive information management
system to track the status of LUCs and ECs - Providing programs for local governments and
other stakeholders
10Relationship Model
11Key Advantages of The Guardian Trust
- Public/Private partnership allows for ongoing
public oversight and private management expertise - Pooling enables most favorable pricing and risk
sharing for program participants - Disciplined stewardship and enhanced
institutional memory - Physical inspections of property and land use
records - Automatic notices to land-use decision makers
- Can interface and support state registries with
updates - Funds placed outside reach of political process
- Provides first alert of remedy breach and cure
confirmation
12Guardianship Services For All Stakeholders
13Implications for Real Estate Transactions
- Risk Based Closures Seen as an Impediment to Real
Estate Transactions - Sellers and Buyers Unable to Agree on Long-Term
Post Closure Costs - Sellers Did Not Want to Risk Losing Liability
Protection Benefits of New Brownfields
Legislation - Sellers Wanted to Be Able to End Active
Management of Sites and Focus on Core Business
Objectives
14Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained
- The Guardian Trust Program Fulfills the Needs of
Sellers, Buyers, Regulatory Agencies and the
Public, and Helps Restore Liquidity and Safety to
the Real Estate Markets for Contaminated
Properties