USLEM and erosion in grid cells - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

USLEM and erosion in grid cells

Description:

... Induced Saltation (RIS) ... RD raindrop induced saltation (RIS) RD raindrop induced rolling (RIR) ... (suspension, saltation, rolling) Toposequence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: peterk99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: USLEM and erosion in grid cells


1
Rainfall ErosionDetachmentandTransportSystems
P.I.A. Kinnell University of Canberra
2
Soil Erosion
  • involves
  • the detachment of soil material at some place
  • and
  • the transport of this material away from the site
    of detachment
  • Two linked processes

3
Soil Erosion
  • Soil loss occurs when particles are detached from
    the surface of the soil matrix and transported
    across some boundary

Loose detached particle
boundary
Deposition
Detachment
Transport

Erosion but no soil loss
4
Detachment and Transport on Hillslopes
Onset of rain Raindrop detachment (RD) splash
transport (ST)
covers the whole slope
5
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • The detachment and transport system associated
    with Splash Erosion

6
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • The detachment and transport system associated
    with Splash Erosion

7
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)

On horizontal surfaces particles splashed back
and forth
8
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)

On horizontal surfaces particles splashed back
and forthand a layer of loose previously
detached particles forms
Previously detached particles
9
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • Previously detached particles protect soil
    surface from detachment
  • But are splashed

Previously detached particles
10
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • Splashed particles come from both soil
    surface and layer of previously detached particles

Previously detached particles
11
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • On sloping surfaces more splashed down slope
    than up so more erosion as slope gradient
    increases
  • but previously detached particles get thicker in
    down slope direction .

Previously-detached particles
12
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • Erodibility susceptibility of eroding surface
    to erosion
  • depends on (a) splash of particles immediately
    after detachment AND (b) splash of previously
    detached material

Previously-detached particles
13
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detachment Splash Transport (RD-ST)
  • Erodibility kS (1-H) kPDP H

ks erodibility when no PDP
H degree of protection provided by the PDP (0 -
1)
kPDP erodibility when fully protected
kPDP
ks
Previously-detached particles
14
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Saltation (RIS)

Occurs when raindrops impact shallow flow
15
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Saltation (RIS)
  • Uplift caused by raindrop impacting flow

Flow
16
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Saltation (RIS)
  • Uplift - Fall

Flow
Particles move downstream during the saltation
event
17
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Saltation (RIS)
  • Layer of previously detached particles
    depth increasing downstream

Flow
18
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Saltation (RIS)
  • Erodibility kS (1-H) kPDP H

Flow
19
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Suspension (RD-FS)

20
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Suspension (RD-FS)
  • Uplift

21
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Suspension (RD-FS)
  • Uplift - Suspended gt FS Fall gt RIS
    at low flow velocities

Particles in Suspension
RIS
Particles transported by RIS travel slower than
by FS
22
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Driven Saltation
(RD-FDS)
  • Uplift - Suspended gt FS Fall gt FDS
    at higher flow velocities

Particles in Suspension
FDS
Particles transported by FDS travel faster than
by RIS
23
Detachment and Transport on Hillslopes
Once runoff develops
With clay, silt and sand particles 3
transport systems with raindrop detachment RD
splash transport (ST) RD raindrop induced
saltation (RIS) RD unassisted
flow transport (FS FDS)
24
Detachment Transport Systems
Flow Detatachment Unassistred Flow Transport
(FD-FT)
25
Detachment Transport Systems
Flow Detatachment Unassistred Flow Transport
(FD-FT)
  • Uplift results from flow energy

26
Detachment Transport Systems
Flow Detatachment Unassistred Flow Transport
(FD-FT)
  • Uplift results from flow energyTransport
    Suspended Load Flow Driven Saltation

Particles in Suspension
FDS
27
Efficiency of Transportof
  • Sand, Silt and Clay particles
  • Splash Transport
    Raindrop Induced Saltation
  • Flow Driven Saltation
  • Flow Driven Suspension

28
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Induced Rolling (RIR)largely associated
with gravel particles
  • Move downstream by rolling

Flow
Wait for a subsequent impact before moving again
Flow Driven Rolling (FDR) may also follow RD
29
Detachment and Transport on Hillslopes
Raindrop detachment (RD) erosion systems RD
splash transport (ST)RD raindrop induced
saltation (RIS)RD raindrop induced rolling
(RIR)RD unassisted flow transport (FT)
(suspension, saltation, rolling)
Flow detachment (FD) erosion systems
FD unassisted FT
(suspension, saltation, rolling)
30
Detachment and Transport on Hillslopes
Toposequence
Raindrop detachment (RD) erosion systems RD
splash transport (ST)RD raindrop induced
saltation (RIS)RD raindrop induced rolling
(RIR)RD unassisted flow transport (FT)
(suspension, saltation, rolling)
Flow detachment (FD) erosion systems
FD unassisted FT
(suspension, saltation, rolling)
Toposequence may expand and contract one or more
times during an event
31
Sheet Erosion
  • Sheet erosion refers to erosion where a portion
    of the soil surface layer over a relatively wide
    area is removed somewhat uniformly.
  • Detachment Transport SystemsRD - STRD - RIS
    RIRRD - FS ( FDS FDR)

32
Rill Erosion
  • Rill erosion refers to erosion in small channels
    that can be removed by normal cultivation.
  • Detachment Transport SystemsFD FS FDS FDR

33
Interrill Erosion
  • Interrill erosion refers to erosion in interrill
    areas
  • Detachment Transport SystemsRD - STRD - RIS
    RDRRD - FS ( FDS FDR)

34
Rill Erosion
Flow Detatachment Unassisted Flow Transport
(FD-FT)
  • Energy absorbed in transport leaves less energy
    for detachment

Flow Suspension
FDS
35
Rill Erosion
Flow Detatachment Unassisted Flow Transport
(FD-FT)
  • Energy absorbed in transport leaves less energy
    for detachment
  • Process based models eg WEPP
  • DF erodibility (flow energy) (1 - qs/Tc)qs
    sediment dischargeTc transport capacity (max
    sed. discharge)
  • (1 - qs/Tc) 0 if qs Tc so DF 0

36
Rill Erosion
  • DF erodibility (flow energy) (1 - qs/Tc)qs
    sediment dischargeTc transport capacity (max
    sed. discharge)
  • Water and sediment flows from interrill areas to
    rills.Interrill erosion contributes to qs and
    reduces DF
  • Rills may often simply act as efficient transport
    routes for interrill erosion

37
Rill Erosion
  • .. ..
  • .
  • .
  • Rills may often simply act as efficient transport
    routes for interrill erosion

Non erodible layer
38
Detachment Transport Systems

Diagram summarising the interaction between
raindrops and flow in respect to determining the
detachment and transport
39
Detachment Transport Systems
  • Critical dropenergy for detachment

40
Detachment Transport Systems
  • Critical dropenergy for detachment

  • Critical flow energy
    for detachment

41
Detachment Transport Systems
  • Critical dropenergy for detachment

  • Critical flow energy
    for detachment

Critical flow energy to move previously
detached material
42
Flow Transport
detachment
Transport of previously detached material
  • Critical flow energies for uniform material
  • Vary with particle size

43
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Transport (RD-FT)
  • Uplift - Suspended gt FT Fall gt RIFT
    at low flow velocities

Flow Transport
RIFT
Particles transported by RIFT travel slower than
by FT
44
Detachment Transport Systems
Raindrop Detatachment Flow Transport (RD-FT)
Flow velocities can increase to above those that
favour RIFT
  • Uplift - Suspended gt FT Fall gt FT
    (Bed Load)

Flow Transport
FT
45
Rainfall Intensity and RIS
Particle travel distance - the distance travelled
after lifted into flow by a drop impact
Drop impact
Particles must be within a distance from a
boundary that is less than the travel distance in
order to pass across that boundary
  • Particles upstream of the active zone require
    many impacts to move to the active zone

46
Rainfall Intensity and RIS
Particle travel distance
Drop impact
Particles must be within a distance from a
boundary that is less than the travel distance in
order to pass across that boundary
  • Sediment discharge varies with particle travel
    distance (X varies with flow velocity particle
    size )

47
Rainfall Intensity and RIS
Particle travel distance
3 parallel flows same velocity but different
particles
Travel 3 times faster than
  • Sediment discharge varies with particle travel
    distance (X varies with flow velocity particle
    size )
  • and drop impact frequency (varies with rain
    intensity)

48
Rainfall Intensity and RIS
0.2 mm sand
49
Rainfall Intensity and RIS
Particle travel distance
In real life a large number of travel distances
occur at the same time in same flow
Travel 3 times faster than
  • Sediment discharge varies with particle travel
    distance (X varies with flow velocity particle
    size )
  • and drop impact frequency (varies with rain
    intensity)

50
Modelling rainfall erosion
  • Knowledge of the 4 detachment and transport
    systems essential to interpreting the results of
    experiments
  • However, so called process-based models do not
    usually deal with the complexities to any large
    extent leads to difficulty when
    parameterisation is based on experiments

51
Modelling rainfall erosion
WEPP Interrill Model
  • Interrill erodibility evaluated experimentally-
    approx 65 mm/h intensity- soil loss after 15
    mins, 25 mins, 35 mins used to produce single
    erodibility value for each soil
  • Dominated by RD RIFT and RD FT
  • Interrill Erodibility kS (1-H) kPDP H
  • kS, kPDL, and H all unknown
  • Difficulty in relating erodibility to soil
    properties

52
Some References
  • KINNELL, P.I.A. (2005). Raindrop impact induced
    erosion processes and prediction. Hydrological
    Processes (in press)
  • KINNELL, P.I.A. (1994).The effect of predetached
    particles on erosion by shallow rain-impacted
    flow.Aust. J. Soil Res. 31(1), 127-142.
  • KINNELL, P.I.A. (1993).Sediment concentrations
    resulting from flow depth - drop size
    interactions in shallow overland flow.Trans ASAE
    36(4), 1099-1103.
  • KINNELL,P.I.A. (1990).The mechanics of raindrop
    induced flow transport.Aust. J. Soil Res.
    28,497-516

53
  • Peter Kinnell
  • University of Canberra
  • Canberra ACT 2601
  • Australia
  • peter.kinnell_at_canberra.edu.au
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com