CAS Special Interest Seminar: Valuation of Insurance Operations

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

CAS Special Interest Seminar: Valuation of Insurance Operations

Description:

CAS Special Interest Seminar: Valuation of Insurance Operations ... Russel L. Sutter, FCAS. April 11, 2000. St. Louis, Missouri. 2. Valuation Concepts as Used in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Towers2
Learn more at: http://www.casact.org

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CAS Special Interest Seminar: Valuation of Insurance Operations


1
CAS Special Interest SeminarValuation of
Insurance Operations
  • Valuation Concepts as Used in Internal
    Performance Measurements
  • Presented by
  • Russel L. Sutter, FCAS
  • April 11, 2000
  • St. Louis, Missouri

2
To Be Discussed
  • ? Basics of valuation concepts
  • ? Why such concepts should be used internally
  • ? How value changes
  • ? Framework of an internal valuation model
  • ? Interpreting and utilizing model output
  • ? Caveats on model usage

3
Basics of Valuation Concepts
  • Three basic concepts of valuation will be
    discussed
  • ? Future cash flows discounted to present
  • ? Capital invested has a cost
  • ? Current decisions have a value by changing 1

4
Why Valuation ConceptsShould Be Used Internally
  • ? Investors care more about the future than the
    past
  • Yahoo Inc., P/E 657
  • Ford Motor, P/E 8
  • ? Current income can be heavily influenced by
    past decisions
  • ? New lines/products lose money initially
  • Net income measures discourage long-term thinking
  • ? Best way to measure whether todays decisions
    benefit the company

5
Why Valuation ConceptsShould Be Used Internally
(cont.)
  • ? New business loses money
  • Higher loss ratios on new business are common
  • Higher expense to generate new business than to
    maintain existing business
  • Valuation concepts necessary to verify that new
    business is adding value

6
How Does Value Change
  • The value of a LOB or channel can change for
    several reasons(examples all show how decreases
    in value may emerge)
  • Reserves can be deficient
  • Experience of inforce business can vary from
    expected
  • Retention rates lower than planned
  • Price levels less than targeted
  • Above-expected claims costs or expenses
  • New business returns can vary as well
  • Same costs but lower price/production
  • Higher underlying loss costs

7
Framework of a Valuation Model
  • Key inputs
  • Surplus and required returns by line of business
  • Original effective date experience model by LOB

8
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
  • Key inputs (cont.)
  • Corporate Account
  • Handles surplus not invested in insurance
    operations
  • Encompasses investment and tax functions
  • Includes all income/expense items not attributed
    to insurance operations(e.g., excessive
    corporate overhead)

9
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
10
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
11
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
  • Consider the following model of an insurers
    business

12
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
  • The insurers value added analysis for 2001 might
    look as follows

13
Framework of a Valuation Model (cont.)
  • The insurers value added analysis for 2001 might
    look as follows (cont.)

14
Interpreting and Utilizing Model Output
  • Run-off of existing business does not add value
    if performance is as expected, despite favorable
    income results
  • If a 12 ROR is appropriate, then
  • Company should write new business in auto and
    homeowners as much as possible as long as it can
    maintain the loss/expense ratios of that
    business, or risk does not increase
  • Company should stop writing new business in
    workers compensation

15
Interpreting and Utilizing Model Output (cont.)
  • The decision to write new business may be viewed
    in terms of breakeven RORs or worthwhile expense
    investments

16
Interpreting and Utilizing Model Output (cont.)
  • Impact of changes to performance in 2001 on value
    of existing business

In 2001 only assumed to revert to normal
levels in 2002
17
Interpreting and Utilizing Model Output (cont.)
  • Value added measurements yield different optimal
    strategies than a net-income measurement

18
Caveats of Internal Valuation Models
  • In using a valuation model for internal
    performance
  • measurements, the following should be considered
  • ? Industry value added is 0 on average
  • ? Interdependence of LOBs
  • a. Does a decision in one line affect another
    performance?
  • b. Allocations that shift expenses between LOB
  • c. Consider customer segment or channel approach
    instead of LOB
  • d. Spread of risk arguments

19
Caveats of Internal Valuation Models
  • ? Internal vs. external RORs
  • a. Market may use a higher ROR for start-up
  • ? Single year vs. multi-year decisions
  • a. Justifying loss this year based on price hike
    next year
  • b. Analogous to timing the market
  • ? Sandbagging
  • a. Adjustment to reserves with new manager

20
Summary
  • Value added approach better reflects benefits to
    the organization of managements current
    decisions
  • Practical applications, decisions such
  • Increasing marketing
  • Reinsurance program structure
  • Conservation programs
  • While perhaps difficult to establish initially,
    successful companies in many industries use
    similar approach today
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)