Title: Peter M Swift
1 - Peter M Swift
- TANKERS TODAY TOMORROW
- - Full Ahead !
2US CIF oil price - USD
Costs of oil transported from the Persian Gulf
to LOOP
3Tanker incidents1978-03
Number
Source LMIS, Informa, press, INTERTANKO
4Accidental pollution from tankers 1,000 ts
5Oil into the Sea Annual Releases, best estimates
6Fleet by hull percentage
72003 in Review
- Increased tanker demand with extra
emphasis on quality - Accelerated introduction of new ships
- Proactive industry on standards and
environmental measures - Volatile but profitable markets
- Awakening investor interest
-
8But.
- Rampant Europe
- UNCLOS challenged
- Regional legislation then IMO fightback
- Partnerships challenged and under strain
- Seafarers criminalised
- And.
- Pushes on transparency, image of industry
9 - TANKERS TODAY
- And
- TOMORROW
- Full Ahead ?
10Full Ahead on Environmental Issues ?
- Anti-Foulings (Convention)
- VOC Recovery
- Sulphur Levels (in Fuel)
- Recycling
- Water Ballast Management
11Full Ahead on Quality and Standards
- Working with Partners
- Class (and others) on Common Rules, Maintenance
and Surveys, CAS etc. - Shipbuilders and Class in Tripartite discussions
on newbuildings - Flag States with Flag State Guidelines
- Port State Control and support of EQUASIS
- Regulators e.g. Partnership Agreement with USCG
(Oily Water Separators), EMSA (Double Hulls in
Service), IMO (GBS et al), EU et al (Air
Emissions Engine and Cargo)
12PSC an industry perspective
- Summary
- PSC is actively supported by industry
- More needs to be done to ensure harmonised
standards - Greater sharing of inspection records would be
beneficial - It is an imperative that the integrity of PSC is
maintained - Better targeting would result from additional
analysis of PSC records - Important lessons can be learned by analysing PSC
performance - Used as membership criteria by associations
- Used in assessments by charterers, insurers and
others
13PSC Operational Issues the shipowners
perspective
- Need to ensure
- Harmonised standards and training of inspectors
- Better / more rational targeting
- Consistency in grounds for detention, naming of
charterer, appeals procedure, etc. - Development of rewards / incentives
14PSC Operational Issues the shipowners
perspective
- Need to ensure integrity of system
- Overly enthusiastic inspectors
- Selective targeting
- Soft option or easy targeting
- Malpractice
- - self interest or third party interest
- BUT Not all owners are guilt free
15Operational Issues in relation to PSC the
shipowners perspective
- Ideas to ensure integrity of system
- Regular and open dialogue between responsible
owners and PSC officials - Development of best practices within PSC
regimes, e.g. With leadership from Paris MoU - Appropriate mechansims for confidential feedback
- Reports back to IMO of PSC performance
16Full Ahead with Partners ?
SHIPOWNER
CLASS SOCIETIES
CHARTERER
- Feedback mechanisms weak
- Openness and transparency doubted
SHIPYARDS
CARGO OWNER
INSURERS
PORTS TERMINALS
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
FLAG STATES
17Tanker incidents 2003 - 130
18Port State Control detentions by ship size
19Port State Control detentions by year of build
20Initiatives via Information Sharing
- Examples of where we could do better
- Tanker Structure Cooperative Forum
- Industry guidelines and standards
- IACS development of Requirements and Procedures
- Port and Terminal Reviews
- Incident reporting and analysis, and casualty
investigations -
-
21Information Sharing
- Impediments to information sharing
- commercial competitiveness
- legal liability
- professional jealousy
- lack of incentives
-
22A Grey fleet ?
Picture source OCIMF
23The same commitment from politicians and
regulators ?
- Convention Ratification
- AFS Convention (2001)
- Annex VI (Air Emissions) (1997)
- HNS Convention (1996)
- OPRC-HNS Protocol (2000)
- Bunkers Convention (2001)
- Places of Refuge
- Reception Facilities
- Port and infrastructure security
-
24Thank you www.intertanko.com