Title: Lessons from the English smoking cessation services
1Lessons from the English smoking cessation
services
- Robert West
- University College London
- Logroño, October 2006
- www.rjwest.co.uk
2Outline
- Principles underpinning development of the
English stop-smoking services - The development of the English services in
practice - Evaluation of the English services
3Principles underpinning the NHS services
- Smoking cessation is vital primary and secondary
prevention for a range of life-threatening and
disabling conditions - Most smokers want to stop but need help to
achieve this - Smoking cessation treatment costs approximately
200 per episode including behavioural support
and medication this saves lives at less than
1000 per life year gained - It would be unethical not to offer this treatment
as a core service within the National Health
Service to those that want it
4Initial ideas for implementation
- Treatment should be carried out by a cadre of
trained specialists employed for the purpose - The system should be organised as a national
network - There should be a common protocol and national
system for monitoring and evaluation - Treatment should follow the Maudsley model with
groups as the preferred option where possible - All health professionals should be made aware of
the treatment service and encourage their smoking
patients to use it - There should be a major national publicity
campaign advertising the service and the benefits
of attending
5What happened in practice good points
- Funding was generous and initially ring-fenced
- There was a broad commitment to an evidence-based
approach to treatment - A large national evaluation project was
commissioned - A national monitoring system was set up
- The treatment services were seen as just one part
of a comprehensive tobacco control programme that
included price increases, increasing smoking
restrictions and other measures
6What happened in practice problems
- Funding was provided on a short-term basis with
uncertainty from year to year about continuation - Monitoring was carried out locally with
inadequate specification of criteria for success
quitter - There was inadequate specification of what
constituted an adequate level and type of service - There was strong pressure to treat as many
smokers as possible with little regard to true
success rates - The government did not pursue other important
elements of tobacco control such as price rises
7Typical structure of services in each locality
Co-ordinator
Healthcare staff GPs Hospital doctors Dentists Nu
rses etc.
Core clinic
Community specialists
Wide reach Robust service Expertise enhanced
Referral
Training
Management
8Trends in treatment usage 2000-2004
- No major change in NRT bought over the counter
(OTC) but - Progressive increase in medication prescribed and
in use of NHS clinics
Data extracted from ONS surveys for the year in
question
9Smoking cessation in the UK 2004
Smokers
Sources 1 Derived from ONS October/November
2004 2 Hughes et al, Tob Con 2003, 12, 21-27 3.
Shiffman et al, 2002, Addiction, 97, 505-512 4.
Addiction supplement March 2005 5. Hughes et al,
2004, Addiction, 99, 29-38 OTC means from shop
or pharmacist
33 Attempt to quit1
21 use treatment1
12 go cold turkey
10 buy NRT OTC1
4 use prescription only1
7 use a smokers clinic1
Quit for at least 12 months
82
83
154
45
0.32
1.05
0.48
0.8
2.65 stop smoking
Prof Robert West, robert.west_at_ucl.ac.uk
10Trends in patients seeking help from doctor
2000-2004
- Steady increase in proportion of patients seeking
help from their doctor for stopping smoking - Tendency for more help-seeking from women than men
Data extracted from ONS surveys for the year in
question
11Use of services in 19 areas by more deprived
smokers
- National evaluation of stop smoking services
(Addiction (2005, supplement) - Proportion of service users residing in the 40
most deprived localities exceeded the proportion
of smokers in those localities in almost all of
19 regions studied - Services are reaching more deprived smokers
Taken from Chesterman et al, Addiction (2005)
12Success rates from clinics
- National evaluation of stop smoking services
(Addiction (2005, supplement) - 29.8 of smokers in sample were quit at 4-week
follow-up verified by CO lt10ppm - 14.6 of smokers reported being abstinent for 52
weeks verified at follow-up by CO -
Taken from Ferguson et al, Addiction (2005)
13Group versus individual treatment in one of the
services
- 1502 smokers in a London-based stop smoking
service - Opportunity to compare success rates within the
same type of service - CO-verified smoking cessation rates during 4
weeks of treatment - Controlling for confounding factors group
treatment was more effective - Move away from group treatment may harm genuine
treatment effectiveness
14Possible improvements
- Use of a more rigorous standard for assessing
success rates (Russell Standard) - Improved training, assessment and supervision of
smoking cessation counsellors - Coordination with national mass media campaigns
to market the services - A focus on providing a high quality service to
smokers who want help with stopping rather than
giving brief counselling to as many smokers as
possible
15Conclusions
- The English stop smoking services were set up in
recognition of - the vital role of smoking cessation in primary
and secondary prevention - the proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
of treatments to help cessation - The initial goals were achieved and the services
have proved very popular - Initial evaluations showed success rates in line
with expectations from clinical trials - Political and financial pressures are currently
causing an unwelcome drive to maximise throughput
at the expense of quality of service - This can be averted by setting appropriate
targets that recognise true success rates, more
rigorous monitoring and setting more stringent
standards for training, assessment and
supervision of counsellors