Title: Dr Martin Hendry
1Why are we here?
Dr Martin Hendry University of Glasgow
2Why are we here?.
The period of inflation in the very early
Universe was invoked to explain some apparent
fine tuning problems.
If the Universe is now inflating, this presents a
new set of fine tuning problems
3State of the Universe Nov 2003
4State of the Universe Nov 2003
Why does 96 of the Universe consist of
strange matter and energy?
5From Lineweaver (1998)
6General Relativity- Geometry
matter / energy Spacetime tells matter how to
move and matter tells spacetime how to
curve Einsteins Field Equations
Ricci tensor
Einstein tensor
Metric tensor
Energy-momentum tensor of gravitating mass-energy
Curvature scalar
7General Relativity- Geometry
matter / energy Spacetime tells matter how to
move and matter tells spacetime how to
curve Einsteins Field Equations
Treating the Universe as a perfect fluid, can
solve equations to determine the pressure and
density, and how they evolve
8Einstein originally sought static solution but
this isnt possible, for normal pressure and
density He added a cosmological constant
to the field equations
Can tune to give static Universe, but
unstable (and Hubble expansion made idea
redundant anyway!)
9Einsteins greatest blunder?
10But what is ? Particle physics motivates
as energy density of the vacuum but
scaling arguments suggest- So historically
it was easier to believe
11Re-expressing Friedmanns Equations At any time
Dimensionless matter density
Dimensionless curvature density
Dimensionless vacuum energy density
12Re-expressing Friedmanns Equations At any
time If the Universe is flat then
Dimensionless matter density
Dimensionless curvature density
Dimensionless vacuum energy density
13State of the Universe Nov 2003
14State of the Universe Nov 2003
15From Lineweaver (1998)
16Value of
Present-day
If the Concordance Model is right, we live at a
special epoch. Why?
17Hydrogen fusion fuelling a stars nuclear
furnace
E mc
2
18P-P chain, converting hydrogen to helium
19This has led to more general Dark Energy or
Quintessence models Evolving scalar field which
tracks the matter density Convenient
parametrisation Equation of State Ca
n we measure w(z) ?
Pressure
Density
20SNIa at z 0.5
At low redshift, SN1a essentially measure the
deceleration parameter
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
21SNIa at z 1.0
At low redshift, SN1a essentially measure the
deceleration parameter
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
22SNIa at 0.5ltzlt1.0
At low redshift, SN1a essentially measure the
deceleration parameter
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
23SNIa measure- CMBR measures- Together,
can constrain-
Tegmark et al (1998)
24Can we distinguish a constant L term from
quintessence? Not from current ground-based SN
observations (combined with e.g. LSS)
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
25Can we distinguish a constant L term from
quintessence? Not from current ground-based SN
observations (combined with e.g. LSS) or from
future ground-based observations (even with LSS
CMBR)
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
26Can we distinguish a constant L term from
quintessence? Not from current ground-based SN
observations (combined with e.g. LSS) or from
future ground-based observations (even with LSS
CMBR)
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)
27Can we distinguish a constant L term from
quintessence? Not from current ground-based SN
observations (combined with e.g. LSS) or from
future ground-based observations (even with LSS
CMBR)
Main goal of the SNAP satellite (launch 2010?)
Adapted from Schmidt (2002)