theory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

theory

Description:

1 that massive and positive social change will emerge from the introduction of a ... The electronic word has no essence, no quiddity, no substance. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: swin2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: theory


1
theory
2
What well cover today
  • Hypertext and critical theory
  • Historical context (utopianism, tech boom)
  • Claims made in 80s 90s
  • Hypertext and poststructural theory
  • Criticisms of this theory
  • More mature and recent theory

3
Context America 1980-96
  • Technological utopianism
  • Personal computing matures
  • Silicon Valley, hacker culture
  • Apples radical 1984 ad
  • California Ideology
  • Barlow Info wants to be free
  • Wired heralds New Frontier Cyberspace

4
Context America 1980-96
  • Claims were made for internet as global force for
    democracy
  • With every swell of the tech-revolutionary
    wave, there are three ideas that pop up
  • 1 that massive and positive social change will
    emerge from the introduction of a single
    communications technology
  • 2 that these changes will be caused by properties
    inherent to the technology and
  • 3 that the revolution occurring is of a scale not
    seen for hundreds of years.
  • Meanwhile, in the literary world

5
Literary Theory
  • Late 80s and early 90s humanities theorists
    discovered the computer.
  • Classics English professors Bolter, Landow,
    Lanham, Moulthrop (right) saw it as radical new
    writing medium
  • In hypertext, they saw the embodiment of the
    radical theory they were immersed in
    .poststructuralism.
  • These theories had political as well as aesthetic
    effects

6
Literary Theory
  • What were these radical theories? Were going to
    look at some examples.

7
Literary Theory
  • The meaning of a sign can only be known in
    relation to other signs its difference from
    other signs.
  • Meaning is eternally deferred through language,
    which is a vast network that never ends.

Derrida questioned our assumptions about how we
make meaning in the world .
The text is a differential network, a fabric of
traces referring endlessly to something other
than itself (Derrida)
8
Literary Theory
  • A text has many different meanings. We cannot
    control how a text will be received each reader
    and each reading will be different
  • Death of the Author (Barthes, Foucalt)
  • Authors intentions meaningless

The frontiers of a book are never clear-cut,
because it is caught up in a system of references
to other texts it is a node within a network
(Foucalt)
9
Literary Theory
  • Writing is a process of citation-situating

A page from Derridas Glas ?
10
Hypertextual Derrida
  • Snap! Perfect match with hypertext!
  • When designers of computer software examine
    the pages of Glas, they encounter a hypertextual
    Derrida and when literary theorists examine
    Literary Machines, they encounter a
    poststructuralist Nelson (Landow)
  • Both grew out of dissatisfaction with linearity
    (Landow)
  • What are these claims?

Landow
11
1. Hypertext dissolves the boundary between
reader and writer
  • Empowered readers
  • The interactive reader of the electronic word
    incarnates the responsive reader of whom we
    make so much (Lanham)
  • We could say that there is no story at all there
    are only readings (Bolter)
  • Joyce exploratory/constructive hypertexts
    wreaders

Michael Joyce
12
2. Hypertext redefines narrative
  • Hypertext has no beginning or end, no strict
    sequence of parts, no unified narrative.
  • Hypertext, which challenges narrative and all
    literary forms based on linearity, calls into
    question ideas of plot and story current since
    Aristotle (Landow)

13
3. Hypertext redefines text
  • The open text vs unified text of print
  • In hypertext there are no closed pages, no
    margins and footnotesall constituent elements
    become equivalent (Landow)

14
4. Hypertext democratises knowledge
  • Hypertext is anti hierarchical and democratic
  • The digitization of the arts radically
    democratizes them (Lanham)
  • Hypertext promotes collaborative learning
    (Johnson-Eilola)
  • As our culture is moving from the printed book
    to the computer, it is also moving from a
    hierarchical social order to what we might call a
    network culture (Bolter).

Nelsons Computer Lib!
15
5. Hypertext is more fluid and creative than
print
  • The electronic word has no essence, no quiddity,
    no substance. It exists in potentia, as what it
    can become (Lanham).
  • The screen text is fluid in the sense of being a
    text in process and the process itself (Snyder)
  • Hypertext is based on the structure of thought
    itself fluid and changing (Nelson)

16
6. Hypertext is an avant garde medium
  • The emancipatory claims forwarded for hypertext
    can be roughly placed in a tradition of avant
    garde aesthetic theory which posits
    epistemological (and social) liberation through
    practices of signification (Paradis)

Marinetti (Futurism - 1919)
17
Hypertext does it reduce cholesterol too?
  • Summary of first-wave hypertext theory
  • Hypertext dissolves the boundary between reader
    and writer (empowered readers)
  • Hypertext redefines narrative
  • Hypertext redefines text
  • Hypertext democratises knowledge
  • Hypertext is fluid and creative (like thought
    itself)
  • Hypertext is an avant garde medium

18
Criticisms of this theory
  • Before we get into criticisms, a few points
  • Try to understand why they got so excited about
    it
  • Historically, similar claims were made for TV,
    radionow mobile
  • We all like to believe we live in an important
    and radical era!

19
Key Criticisms
  • General criticisms
  • Technological determinism
  • Technology causes social change.
  • eg hypertext democratises teaching and
    learning
  • Technological Utopianism
  • Technology causes social change, and this change
    is good!
  • eg hypertext liberates us from confines of print

20
Key Criticisms
  • Claim hypertext liberates the reader
  • Relies on idea that print readers are passive,
    and that mechanically activating links empowers
    them
  • Print readers were never passive!
  • Anyway, in hypertext the authors hand has been
    there before us, deciding which connections
    matter and which dont
  • Fuller and Pope what is the difference between
    clicking a hyperlink and using a Coke machine?

21
Key Criticisms
  • Claim Hypertext is nonlinear
  • Nonlinear comes from physics, where it means
    unpredictable, irreversible Chaos Theory
  • Hypertext theorists want this radical meaning
  • But hypertext is not chaotic or unpredictable.
    The author has laid down connections. Lines are
    still lines!
  • Even constructive hypertexts are not a chaotic
    system
  • Hypertext doesnt liberate us from regulated
    time/space
  • Logocentrism.

22
Key Criticisms
  • Claim hypertext embodies the Derridean text
  • Deconstruction can never be a positive science.
  • On surface its good idea. But Derrida was
    talking about the nature of all language not just
    hypertext.

23
Key Criticisms
  • Claim hypertext is an avant garde medium

To be truly chaotic, truly radical in the sense
we have explored, a hypertext system would need
to demonstrate no authorial control. Hypertext
is not inherently a rhizome/ derridean/etc
whether it is avant-garde depends on how it is
used
24
One final thing
  • Utopian claims about hypertext rely on the
    structure of the system itself (nodes and links)
    and then ascribe an ideology to this structure
  • As media students we know that ideology is a
    human thing, it is not inherent to any particular
    technology
  • So it is possible to be radical with hypertext,
    to make people question how they make meaning in
    the world, but its not innately radical!

25
Summary of criticisms
  • Techno determinism/utopianism
  • Claims that technology shapes society
  • Hypertext doesnt liberate the reader
  • never trapped in the first place!
  • Hypertext is not nonlinear
  • Lines are still lines, even if there are embedded
    in a hypertextual matrix!
  • Deconstruction can never be embodied
  • Nor can the Derridean text (it is the nature of
    all language)

26
New Directions in Theory
  • We might call this the second wave wiser,
    more sober reflections

Jay David Bolter
27
Remediation
  • Bolter Grusin
  • Concepts
  • Remediation
  • Hypermediacy/immediacy
  • Draw attention to medium itself vs transparency

28
Remix Culture
  • Lev Manovich
  • Traditional communication relied on information
    going in one direction from source to receiver,
    now the reception point is a temporary station on
    the informations path. It arrives, gets remixed
    with other information, then travels on
    (Manovich)
  • Modularity helps with remixing in digital media

29
Conclusions
  • Hypertext theorists over-excited in late 90s!
  • Hypertext can be an avant-garde medium, but it
    depends on how it is used not inherently radical
  • Remediation and remixing
  • Hypertext is not a radical new invention, like
    all technologies it remediates prior media forms
  • Everything is deeply intertwingled.

30
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com