Title: Catalogues
1Catalogues Standards for Knowledge,
Information Data
- Alan DonigerChief Technology OfficerPOSC
2Outline
- There is a requirement for common vocabularies,
syntax, and classifications within the EP
industry in support of effective knowledge work. - The current POSC EP Cataloguing Standards
- History
- Roles
- Future Evolution
- Underlying principles
- The K-I-D continuum
- Spanning traditional documents and digital data
- Context and its capture
- Cataloguing as a natural part of our business
processes - Accessing the Standards from the POSC Web Site
3POSC EP Cataloguing Standards
- Shells request to POSC, Feb. 2002
- Promulgate, evolve, and support EP Cataloguing
Standards as global industry standards - Adopted by the POSC Data Store Solutions SIG
- The highest priority of five published
recommendations - Developed July December 02
- Published March 03
- Ongoing subject for the SIG acting as the
(virtual) EP Cataloguing Standards User Group - POSC Member Conference Presentations
- Houston and London, April May 02
- (Shell Expro, Erik van Kuijk)
- London and Houston, Oct. Nov. 02
- London, May 03
- Shell NAM, Hugo Belder
- Danish oil company, Christian Hoeier
4POSC EP Cataloguing Standards
- Workshops/Seminars
- Shell Expro Workshop, Aberdeen, Mar. 02
(DTI/CDA/POSC) - POSC Workshop, Houston, Sep. 02
- POSC Workshop, Scavenger, Dec. 02
- PPDM Taxonomy Seminar, Calgary, Sep. 03
- PNEC Data Management Conference, Houston, May 04
- DSS Regional SIG Meetings, Scavenger and Houston,
June 04 - Material submitted to POSC thus far
- Shell Expro, Mar. 02
- Shell PMI, Business Process Reference Model, Q3
of 02 - Flare, Q3-4 of 02
- Shell NAM, April Jun. 03
- Shell Global Taxonomy, anticipated in 05
5Lord Browne (CEO, BP) has said, "Anyone in the
organization who is not directly accountable for
making a profit should be involved with creating
and distributing knowledge that the company can
use to make a profit."
6Underlying Principles
Treat Knowledge, Information Data as a continuum
Build catalogues that span Information in
documents and databases using standardized
classification schemes
Understand and capture Information ( K-I-D )
context
Manage knowledge capture and classification as
natural parts of the business process
7Catalogue and the DSS SIG Interests
8EP Catalogue Attributes
9EP Catalogue Attributes
Contextual
Consumer Discipline
Producer Discipline
Product Type
Information Item Class
Info Item Type
Asset Type
Producer Business Process
Asset UID
Information Type
The Information Item Type has a unifying role
as a Generic Title
jump
10Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
11Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
e.g. Appraisal Well Proposal Well Rock/Core
Data Well Completion Programme Active Well
Drilling Process
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
An Information Item Type automatically maps to
the other contextual Attributes (and more). This
can simplifying the CATALOGUING process.
12Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Examples Standards Raw data/as-built
records Lesson Learned Plans, Programmes Proposals
, applications Contracts and agreements Operations
Report Correspondence Meeting Minutes Audits and
Inspections Analysis and Interpretation
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
13Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Examples Well Drilling Well Data
Acquisition Determine Hydrocarbon
Structure Seismic Interpretation Evaluate
rock/fluid properties Petrochemical
Interpretation Calculate hydrocarbons in place
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
14Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Examples Geology Geophysics Petrophysics Reservoir
Engineering Production Technology
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
15Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Examples Well Basin Field Survey Platform Pipeline
Reservoir
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
16Contextual Attributes
Producer Business Process
Consumer Business Process
Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type /
Standard Title
Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class
Information (K-I-D) Type
Examples WellRock/Core WellEquipmentTubing Well
Header WellSynthetics WellStrat
Pick FieldReserves SurveySite
Survey PipelineUllage
Producer Discipline
Consumer Discipline
Asset Type
Asset Identifier
17Another thought
If the product plans for successful projects in
this area (inter-enterprise information exchange)
were to be analyzed, the finding would be that
considerable time is spent not so much in
defining interfaces but in classifying and
providing common terms for the business aspects
in that domain. Source Cutter Consortium
18Taxonomy Issues
Taxonomy Usage Guidelines
Reference Models
Industry Taxonomy
Aliases
Company Unique
- Different names for the same items
- local names
- languages
- Different items
- regulatory regime
- differing business processes
- legacy
19jump
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23jump
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28jump
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31jump
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36Summary
In 02, The Shell Expro experience with
Cataloguing was presented to industry. POSC
agreed to support and evolve supporting attribute
and vocabulary definitions. Several workshops
were held.
In 03, POSC published the first version of the
standards on recommendation of the DSS SIG. Shell
(Holland) expanded Expros work. Shell has been
working on global integration.
Efforts to enable and align related EP
specifications and standards (e.g. reference
value standards) with the EP Cataloguing
taxonomy standards should go forward.
37Summary
In 05, we hope to achieve enhanced EP Catalogue
standards based on input from Shell and others.
Broad industry participation is essential!
Efforts towards practical solutions can be
incremental. Benefits can be realized along the
way.
Focusing on taxonomies and cataloguing is an
essential part of the trend by large oil and
service/software companies towards data storage
and access federation.
38Contact
Alan Doniger doniger_at_POSC.org 1 713 267
5124 www.POSC.org