Title: Urban training and studies institute UTI
1Urban training and studies institute
(UTI) Housing and Building National Research
Centre (HBRC) In cooperation with Development
Planning Unit (DPU) University College London
(UCL)
International Seminar Titled Governance of
Peri-Urban water and sanitation services The
role of external support agencies (ESAs)
By Dr. Ayman Ibrahim Kamel ElHefnawi
Cape Town, South Africa, 17-18 October 2005
2- Many countries face a governance crisis rather
than a water crisis. Good water governance
requires effective and accountable socio
political and administrative systems adopting an
integrated water resources approach with
transparent and participatory processes that
address ecological and human needs.
www.worldwatercouncil.org/
3Introduction to GCR and the two localities, some
basic information
- 12-16 million inhabitants
- 850 thousand Feddans
- Formed of three governorates (Cairo, Giza and
Qualiobiya). - No body charged with its daily management
(governance of GCR) - Huge development built over agricultural land.
- Important (only) metropolitan region for its
central political position at the national,
regional and international levels - Water and sanitation in this agglomeration is
managed mainly by two provisional agencies.
4The research identified the following
characteristics which characterize PU areas in
both localities
- PU areas are extending, on agriculture land
located on the peripheral of cities such as
Cairo, Giza, Alexandria - PU form is characterised by its random housing
(synonym to informal housing ashwaiatt) - These areas suffer from poor utilities
(facilities) and improper social infrastructure. - PU settlers are residing with or near their
relatives, forming foci of interrelated families.
- They work mostly in the informal sector earning
low and unsteady wages. - They have limited social mobility
- Settlers have fragile and weak economy
- They lack the capability to work in groups
- submission
(Yousry et al 1997, Moawad 1998, Elhefnawi 2001).
5PUI areas in Greater Cairo Region Cairo 11
areas Giza 25 areas Qalyoubia 5 areas (In
addition some additional areas especially in
Qualiobia governorate in the northern parts of
GCR, which are shown as spots in the upper part
of figure)
PU areas inside GCR
6PU areas in GCR -1
Invasion to agricultural lands
7PU areas in GCR -2
2
Chosen localities
1
8Types of activities and tools
- Primary data Collection and analysis
- Survey A 57 questions structured interview
(questionnaire) was undertaken in the two study
localities. Overall, 404 questionnaires were
conducted in person taking full control over the
process - Focus group discussions
- A total of 11 focus group meetings were
conducted with different social groups to
represent various economic activities as well as
gender. - Key informant interviews
- A number of key informant interviews were
conducted with City Heads, Village Heads,
Environmental Unit Officers, private informal
service providers and officials of key
information in specific themes. - Transect walks and field observations
- Key informants, community leaders or local
government officials were helpful in this regard
and they joined some walks. General observations
were supported by brief and informal interviews
focusing on any issue of concern. - Photographs of problems
- Photography was used to enhance participatory
methods and reflect community problems. - Secondary data sources
9Current debates in WSS IN GCR
Processes of change are those related to tariff
restructuring, new regulatory framework, the
institutional reforms and the role of the local
contractors or the informal private sector to
cope with the WSS challenges in the PU localities
10Debatable tariff changes and cost recovery
challenges
- Currently, there is ongoing debate about a new
tariff structure The main argument behind that
increase was to - firstly, recover the operation and maintenance
costs. - secondly, to recover the depreciation costs
- finally to recover partly the capital costs.
- This conflict reached its peak in October 2004
where the Egyptian government retreated from its
previous position represented in the sudden
increase of the WSS tariff from 13 PT/m3 to 23
PT/m3. The Egyptian government cut that sudden
increase and levied it into a one year
instalment. - - The impact in both localities was variant
there was an anger and distrust in the first
locality and less opposition in the second,
however, both interviewees expected that the
people will cooperate with the government
especially after the sudden retreat of the
government to levy the new tariff.
11The role of the informal private sector
- The intervention of the local contractors or the
informal private sector in both localities was
crucial, - Local contractors providing the service of
latrine evacuation do already exist in most of
the two PU localities they cover more than 75
of that service in both of them where the role of
the public sector in that respect, is minimal. - The second important role for local contractors
or the informal private sector is in selling
water (water vendors) to the inhabitants.
Although, both localities declared their doubts
in the quality of sold water, it is the first
locality which showed that more than 80 of the
total great dependence on this type of water
provision with less dependence on informal water
vendors in the second locality.
12Impact of change on the governance of WSS
- The Egyptian government, in its reforms, has
given enormous weight to the role that MOHUUC
could play rather than the other actor's roles
and responsibilities. - It is remarked as well that the role of the
local authorities in the WSS is shrinking. - There is prevailing focus on urban areas rather
than rural or PU areas, the limitation of non
conventional sanitation services could reflect
the non-recognition of another set of wider
actors and partners involved in developing and
servicing this sector such as the civil society
organisations and the local contractors or
informal private sector. - The Egyptian government realised the heavy
coordination burdens required to provide WSS,
MOHUUC is expected to fill this gap in big urban
agglomeration.
13Main government and non-government bodies
involved in WSS in Egypt
Ministries
Mega governorate
Other governorate
Corporate companies
Others
Ministry of Housing
GCR
Local Units
Economic Agencies (7)
Beneficiaries
NOPWSD
GOGCPW
SFD
Housing and infra. Directorate/ Potable water and
sanitary drainage dept.
Stock companies (3)
CAC
GOGCSD
Donor agencies
EAGCSDP
Alexandria
Private companies
Other ministries
NUCA
GOAPW
Ministry of Local Administration
GOASD
Informal private sector
14Responsible actors for the different steps of
water and sanitation cycle in GCR
15Stakeholders profile in the two localities
Governor
Complete segregation
Provincial Government Agencies (GOGCSD) (GOGCPW)
Provincial Government Agencies (NOPWSD)
Secretary General
Environmental Management Units
Special agencies (SFD Shourouk NGOs
CDAs) Informal private sector
Heads of Markaz
LGU City Tier 1st locality
LGU - Village Tier 2nd locality
EU (Environmental Units)
Engineering department
Dept. of Water and Sanitation Or housing
directorate
16The Web of Institutionalisation
POLICY SPHERE
ORGANISATIONAL SPHERE
Central Government
MOH
MOP
MOHUUC
MOIWR
MOLD
MOA
MSEA
MOIC
PC
EEAA
HBRC
DA
SFD
People's SPHERE
Giza Gov.
Qualiobia Gov.
Cairo Gov.
LA
GOGCPW
EAGCSDP
GOGCSD
NOPWSD
Sherouk
Markaz
DELIVERY KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION SPHERE
Informal private sector (Water tankers)
LGU
Informal private sector (latrine evacuators)
Standard top-down relationship Weak
relationship Non-regulated relationship Strong
top-down relationship
17Sectoral institutional reforms in the public
sector
(2000 - 2004)
Infrastructure Committee
Minister of Housing, Utilities and New Communities
NOPSWAD
ADWSPC
Central department for private sector
participation
Holding Company (HCWS)
Housing and Utilities Sector
Central department Regional level
14 organization, economic agencies and stock
companies
Cairo
Giza
Qualiobiya
18Regulatory reforms
- The first decree, 135 for 2004 is concerned with
the creation of a Holding Company for Drinking
Water and Sanitation (HCWS) and its affiliated
companies. The mandate of the holding company and
its affiliates covers purification, distribution
and sale of drinking water as well as collection,
treatment and safe disposal of sewage. - The second Presidential decree, 136 for 2004,
covers the creation of Authority for Drinking
Water and Sanitation Sector, and the protection
of the consumer (ADWSPC) This decree aims at
regulation, monitoring, and supervision of all
that relates to drinking water and sanitation
activities and interventions so as to achieve the
highest level of performance.
The main question is do these decrees have any
significant impact on WSS provision in PU areas?
19PU areas in GCR -2
20PU areas in GCR -2
Research Project Case Study Areas
First Locality
Second Locality
21PU areas in GCR -2
22MAJOR FINDINGS
- Empirical study and examination show significant
disparities between socio-economic
characteristics and environmental challenges in
both localities. - Higher activity rates in second locality (29.9)
compared to the first locality (15.7). - Lower unemployment rates in the first (3.5)
versus (4.5) in the second
23Environmental disparities
- 1- In the second locality, water supply is no
longer an environmental challenge, and water
quality is less of a problem than in the first
locality, where the following problems are
dominating -
- - Severe water supply problem, reflected in
frequent water cuts and dependency on private
informal services of water supply, i.e. private
water vendors. - - More severe is the problem of unsafe
quality of artesian water, which is mixed
together with potable drinking water in the main
water-pipe network that results again in buying
water privately for drinking and cooking
purposes. - 2- However, sanitation remains a higher priority
for residents and officials
24Poverty characteristics
- Didifferent participatory techniques show similar
characteristics of poverty as follows - Increased number of family members with its
impact on increasing density and congestions,
increasing dependency rate, poor housing
conditions, i.e., lack of safe potable water,
safe sanitation.....etc. - Low household incomes, lack of productive assets,
lack of savings opportunities and lack of
collaterals for micro credits. - Increased illiteracy rates (especially between
females). - Spread of many infectious and endemic diseases
due to insufficient health services and increased
infant mortality rates as a direct impact of
several water borne diseases and lack of adequate
sanitation services - Community participation limitations
- There is no adequate role of the community
organisations and the NGOs in that respect. - The community participation in the Egyptian
context of WSS is mainly focused in their
participation in financial contributions only
(i.e. paying levied fees for public and informal
private sector involvement in the WSS service
and/or paying for their individual pipelines
connections)
25Internal immigration and urbanisation caused by
illegal land occupation over agricultural
land Internal immigration " the so called by
indigenous communities as strangers" has a
negative impact on available services. However,
immigrants participation can be partly triggered
off through adequate mobilisation. Impact of
huge infrastructure projects built in PU
areas Field study shows some positive impacts of
the ring road on the community (second locality),
but also some other negative impacts. Discussions
within focus groups and key informants interviews
confirmed the positive impacts especially the
economic and social benefits directly resulting
from better access and transportation. As for
negative impacts, participants claim that the
ring road also caused damage of large
agricultural land and added noise and air
pollution due to increased traffic.
26Conclusions -1
- Peri-urban dwellers are exposed to a combination
of rural and urban health hazards associated with
water consumption and waterborne sanitation -
- Rural-urban interactions are not taken into
account in the Egyptian WSS. - In the peri-urban interface, the gap in coverage
between water supply and sanitation is larger
than in urban areas
27Conclusions -2
- Water governance in GCR is mostly dominated by
government agencies with very little role played
by the formal and informal private sector and the
community organisations. - Decision making process in the WSS was and still
representing a very centrally driven sector with
very little role-played by the private sector.
There is no clear standpoint in the Constitution
which attract the private sector in the WSS as
other utilities in Egypt (electricity,
telecommunications, roads). - The existing institutional set-up for WSS in GCR
and in the two localities have shown great
challenges such as lack of coordination between
the different government bodies, lack of trained
and skilled technicians, lack of regulations to
regulate the role of the informal sector, lack of
financial mechanisms to support the institutions
28Conclusions -3
- The peri-urban poor rely mainly on a wide
spectrum of informal practices to access water
supply and sanitation , which often remain
invisible to policy makers and lie outside
formal supportive strategies - The two localities have shown the involvement of
the informal private sector in selling of water
tankers. - In the case of sanitary drainage, the role of
the private sector was essential where they
cooperated with the local government in latrine
evacuation in return of a normal fee. Their role,
in both localities, represents more than 50-75
of the total efforts performed.