IDSF New Judging System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

IDSF New Judging System

Description:

Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and public ... Posture and Poise. Body line, shape, design. Hold or Holds. Positions and transitions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: natasa9
Category:
Tags: idsf | judging | new | poise | system

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IDSF New Judging System


1
IDSF New Judging System
  • Proposal
  • Stuttgart , 23rd August 2009

2
Concept
  • Based on a ISU judging system that has IOC
    approval
  • Possibility of phase by phase implementation
  • Improved objectivity of marking
  • Improved transparency
  • Better understanding of judging by IOC, media and
    public
  • Provides constructive feedback to athletes and
    trainers

3
Changes needed
  • Establishing the criteria - clear definitions
  • Establishing a numerical marking scale
  • Changing the format of the competition
  • Creating appropriate software and hardware
  • Changing the mindset of all participants involved

4
IDSF New judging System
  • Programme Components Score PCS
  • First draft ready for discussion and testing
  • General Deductions
  • First draft ready for discussion and testing
  • Technical Elements Score
  • Not ready due to lack of technical definitions

5
PROGRAMME COMPONENTS
  • 5 COMPONENTS CRITERIA
  • PB Posture, Balance, Coordination
  • QM Quality of Movement
  • MM Movement to music
  • PA Partnering
  • CP Choreography and Presentation

6
PB Posture, Balance, Coordination
  • Posture and Poise
  • Body line, shape, design
  • Hold or Holds
  • Positions and transitions
  • Balance
  • Static- Dinamic
  • Individual- Couple
  • Coordination of movement

7
QM Quality of Movement
  • Actions
  • General
  • Style specific
  • Dynamics
  • Flow
  • Weight
  • Time
  • Space

8
MM Movement to Music
  • Time
  • Tempo
  • Rhytmical structure
  • Phrasing
  • Timing
  • Musicality

9
PA - Partnering
  • Physical connection
  • Communication without physical connection
  • Appropriateness
  • Effectiveness
  • Consistency

10
CP - Choreography and Presentation
  • Well balanced choreography
  • Content
  • Space
  • Partnering
  • Level of difficulty
  • Atmosphere
  • Creativity
  • Expression
  • Interpretation

11
Screen- JDSF system
12
Marking scale
  • 10 Outstanding
  • 9 Superior
  • 8 Very Good
  • 7 Good
  • 6 Above Average
  • 5 Average
  • 4 Fair
  • 3 Weak
  • 2 Poor
  • 1 Very Poor

13
General Deductions
  • Balance loss
  • Momentary
  • Frequent
  • Fall
  • Delayed start
  • Early finish
  • Loss of connection
  • Momentary
  • Frequent or long
  • Dancing out of time
  • Momentary
  • Frequent or long
  • Discontinuation
  • Momentary
  • Frequent or long
  • Error
  • Momentary
  • Frequent

14
PCS Phase 1
  • Programme components ( Criteria)
  • Presentation Stuttgart
  • Discussion
  • Corrections
  • Test event
  • Discussion
  • Corrections

15
PCS Phase 2
  • Involving a wider panel of experts to create a
    final content of program components
  • Further presentations at IDSF adjudicators
    congresses
  • Further testing -to be decided by the Presidium
    of IDSF
  • Presentation to the IDSF 2010 AGM
  • Discussion
  • Changes( if required )
  • Motion for approval to the 2011 IDSF AGM

16
PCS Phase 3
  • Education and training of IDSF Adjudicators
  • Implementation in IDSF events
  • World Championships
  • IOC events

17
Technical Elements Score
  • Parallel developement of the system for TES
  • Technical definitions of dance figures
  • Latin?
  • Compulsory figures?
  • Assigning base value to each figure level of
    difficulty
  • Deciding on the scale of deductions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com