REGNET Power Point Template

1
(No Transcript)
2
Detailed agenda 2nd day
Validation day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
900 - 915 Opening Session 1 Usability
Tests 915 - 930 Introduction 930 -
1030 Working Groups Usability criteria for
the REGNET system Questionnaires - questions
task Card Sorting exercise 1030 -
1100 Coffee break 1100 - 1130 Presentation
Discussion Report by rappateur,
agreement Session 2 Functional Tests 1130 -
1145 Introduction 1145 - 1300 Working
groups Discussion (together with technical
partners !?
Flexible course of this session!
3
Detailed agenda 2nd day
Validation day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
1300 - 1400 Lunch Break Session 3 Content
Tests 1400 - 1415 Introduction 1415 -
1515 Working groups Define necessary content
quality criteria 1515 - 1600 Presentation
Discussion Report by rappateur,
agreement 1600 - 1630 Coffee Break Session 4
Content Collection (Plan) - Other content
types 1630 - 1645 Introduction 1645 -
1715 Working groups Working on the templates
for other object types, Issues to be agreed
upon with regard to the collecting of
content
4
Detailed agenda 2nd day
Validation day
Tuesday, 2002-06-25
Session 4 Content Collection (Plan) (cont) 1715
- 1800 Presentation Discussion Report by
rappateur, agreement 1800 - 1830 Summary of 2nd
day
What we have prepared - Introductions to the
methodology - Tools instruments - Tasks for
working groups - Suggestion for task assignment -
To Dos after Sofia
See set of working materials!
5
2nd day - High-level planning
Session 1 Remaining issues 1st day 1100 -
1200 - Data entry - How to proceed? -
Presentation of Object Publisher (Walter) Session
2 Short overview about validation/task
assignment 1200 - 12.30 - Short overview about
the tests to be carried out - Draft for task
assignment Session 3 Status reports 1230 - 1500
Starting with MECH Common session with technical
partners regarding functional testing 1500 -
1600
6
Data preparation
Part 1 Data Entry Issues Object
Publisher AIT - Steps, status/available
databases - Open issues 1100 - 1200
7
Data entry - Issues, questions
- How will the data be processed? - Is there any
effort necessary from the side of the content
providers? - Could you process all data
(formats) more or less automatically? - How
should new data be managed (cataloguing,
uploading) - Use the templates Vic provided? -
Any local solution? (CMS) - When will all
databases be available? The actual process of
data conversion seems to be very time-intensive -
How could the further process of export be
supported by the content providers which
tools/respe. formats?
8
Data entry - Testing strategy
Test is needed for - Conversion of data
(integrity check) - Content quality criteria -
Tools Functionality !
9
Detailed agenda 3nd day
Wednesday, 2002-06-26
Open and remaining issues (3rd Day) 830 -
1045 Open, remaining issues Consolidation,
planning, reporting Report by rappateur,
agreement 1045 End of content group meeting
10
Status reports
Status reports could not be finished during the
meeting All partners should send their
presentations to AIT for publishing on the web
site - to prepare review meeting - to give other
partners possibility to inform about status of
data generation/data available
11
Review Meeting
Final preparation(after lunch)
Review Meeting 2002-07-04
Planning Content related issues WP
2.1 Presentation of content cases (30 minutes) 1.
Introduction - Tasks, work done, status (IMAC) 10
minutes 2. Tools for (offline) data entry (TARX)
5 minutes 3. Topic map structuring (TARX) 5
minutes 4. Content Cases 1 - SUL 5. Content Cases
2 - TARX (MECH/GRAN) 6. Content Cases 3 - ICCS
Technical partners should prepare demos using
real data.Already fixed for E-Shop (NRM, LMG,
GRAN) ZEUS
12
Validation concept
2002-06-26 Validation concept!
13
Validation framework
Usability
Functionality
Content
Performance
What?
Does it workas promised?
Can the (end)user work withthe system?
Does thecontent meetexpectations?
Does it deliver in time, withoutcracking
underheavy load?
Why?
Test based onfunctional requirements
User exercises,card sorting,heuristics
Online testsagainst defined quality criteria
Load and stress tests
How?
Experts
User
Experts
Tasks
Schedule
Reporting procedures
14
Test strategy - overview
Carrying out the tests (1st phase)
Internal Test User (Consortium)
Professionals Administrators(people who
shouldwork with the system)
Developers People who developed the system and
must implement changes
Experts People with special know-how (e. g.
designer which could judge about special aspects
of the system ( e. g. usability)
Instruments Guidelines
Validation PM IMAC
Results (Reporting workflow)
Effort foreseen approx. 18 PM 2002-06-30
15
Test strategy - overview
Carrying out the tests (2nd phase)
REGNET partners (consortium)
Validation PM TARX
External Test User
Professionals Administrators Customers
End Users Visitors, cultural workers(e. g.
artists)
WP 4 Demonstration Phase 2002-07-01 - End of
the project
16
To Dos in Sofia and after Sofia
Workplan for Sofia
1. Agreement on test user groups
(professionals) 2. Finalise usability
questionnaires 3. Finalise usability criteria
(REGNET Usability Index) 4. Define content
quality criteria 5. Evaluate templates for
additional object types (Portal) 6. Agree upon
relevant content for the portal
Workinggroups
6. Agreement on test cases - necessary functional
tests 7. Definition of technical quality criteria
(performance criteria/scenarios)
Plenum/specialworkinggroups
Task assignment and scheduling (high-level
planning)
17
To Dos in Sofia and after Sofia
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
Performance tests
Technical partners
18
To Dos in Sofia and after Sofia
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
19
To Dos in Sofia and after Sofia
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
20
To Dos in Sofia and after Sofia
Tasks to be assigned (during the meeting)
21
Most important tasks
? Expert group for heuristic testing of
portalCatalogue of criteria available ? Expert
group for validation of language(s)Could be done
on the basis of the content quality assurance
sheets ? Partners responsible for functional
tests Assignment of tasks according to the
componentspresented
E-Shop/Catalogue Management Auction
System E-Publishing Topic Map (Generator),
Viewer? Data Generation Search (Multi-Site
search?) Portal (Heuristic Evaluation)
22
Most important tasks
? Generate new content Catalogue of criteria
available ? Translate existing content Must
be a task of the content providers. Work must
bedistributed according to native language!
Suggestion group of technical and content
partner ...