Title: Second Language Acquisition Semester 1, 2004
1Second Language Acquisition Semester 1, 2004
2Two dimensions of word knowledge
- Breadth the number of words the meaning of which
one has at least some superficial knowledge. - - a continuum of partial to precise knowledge
- Depth how well one knows a word
- - knowledge components identified by use in
various contexts
3Two more dimensions of word knowledge
- Receptive skills perceiving a word while
listening or reading and retrieving its meaning - Productive skills wanting to express a meaning
through speaking and writing and retrieving and
producing the appropriate spoken or written form. - Also passive versus active
4What does it mean to know a word?
- Knowledge of form
- spoken
- written
- word parts
- Knowledge of meaning
- form meaning
- concepts referents
- association
- Knowledge of use
- grammatical functions
- collocations
- constraints on use Nation (2001), p 27
5Organisation of the mental lexicon
- Given the number of words in the working lexicon,
word retrieval must be fast and fluent. - There must be some systematic way in which all
these words are organised in mental lexicon.
6Recognising words The role of sound-based links
- Word recognition is facilitated by sound-based
links to the lemma. These links include syllable
sequence information, the words rhythmic pattern
and the internal structure of syllables. Access
is achieved through a process of interactive
activation, in which many candidates can compete
for selection.
7Producing words From meaning to sound
- Word access in production uses lemma information
to guide the selection of the correct meaning and
word class. Many candidates can compete for
selection is evident in speech error blends,
such as She chuttled (chuckle chortle) at the
news. My buggage (baggage luggage) is too
heavy.
8L1 and L2 mental lexicon
- Do form and meaning in the L2 function in the
same way as in the L1? - Does the L2 mental lexicon develop independently
of the L1 ?
9Form and meaning in the L2 mental lexicon
- The phonological view
- The L2 lexicon is organised primarily on a
phonological basis.
10Evidence for the phonological view
- Findings from Word association task
- Meara (1978) presented L1 and L2 subjects a word
in French and asked them to give a word
associated with it.
11Syntagmatic and paradigmatic links
- Native speakers gave paradigmatic or syntagmatic
responses, depending on semantic factors. - Paradigmatic
- Stimulus Response
- man woman / child/ dog/ etc.
- Syntagmatic
- brush teeth
- hold hands
- bank robber
- etc.
12Clang associates
- L2 learners tended to give responses based on
phonological similarity (clang associates),
such as producing plafond ceiling, or
professeur professor for the stimulus profund
deep. - Meara concluded that phonological organization is
relatively more important in the L2 lexicon.
13Countering the phonological view
- Although the phonological view has had wide
currency, several shortcomings of the original
research have been noted (Singleton, 1999). - gtgt L1 words may be mistaken for other words
- gtgt Few genuine clang responses
- gtgt Failure to replicate (OGorman, 1996).
- gtgt Similarities to L1 child-adult differences
- Children also produce clangs.
- Syntagmatic gtgtgt Paradimatic shift evident.
- Singleton, D. (1999). Exploring the second
language mental lexicon. Cambridge Cambridge
University Press
14Form and meaning in L2 word learning
- Lack of evidence for phonological view.
- Formal factors affecting L2 acquisition also
affect L1 acquisition. - Learning meaning is more difficult than learning
form. - Both form and meaning play a role from the very
beginning in L2 word learning.
15Intralexical factors in L2 vocabulary learning
- Form-based factors that affect word learnability
- pronunciability
- length
- grammatical category
- morphological complexity
16Intralexical factors in L2 vocabulary learning
- Meaning-based factors that affect word
learnability - specificity of meaning
- multiple meaning
- connotational nuances
- synonymy
17The bilingual lexicon
- Common or separate memory representations?
- Evidence for common system come from studies
showing crosslinguistic priming 'casa will
prime 'house'. - Kroll, J.F. (1993). Accessing conceptual
representations for words in a second language.
In Schreuder, R. Weltens, B. (Eds.) The
bilingual lexicon. Amsterdam John Benjamins. Pp
53-81
18Evidence for separate systems
- Other studies show no crosslanguage effects in
repetition priming. - Block A. Subjects make word-nonword decisions
(lexical decision task) in one language. - Block B lexical decision task on list which
contains translation from first list. Translated
word no faster than new word. - Block A house table sky ...
- Block B madre casa agua.
- Methodological issues raised re the lexical
decision task
19A common conceptual system
- Levels of representation model
- Words are surface level independent lexical
representations - Concepts are part of a single underlying
conceptual system - Â
- Word association L2 words gain access to
concepts via L1 words - Concept mediation L2 words directly access
concepts.
20The bilingual lexicon
- L2 development seen as shifting from word
association to conceptual access. -
Lexical links
L1
L2
concepts
21Conclusions about the bilingual lexicon
- Form and meaning in the L2 function in the same
way as in the L1 - The L1 and L2 are functionally separate
phonological and orthographic systems but have a
close interconnection at the conceptual level.
22End of slides Week 12 SLA