OverQoS: Offering QoS using Overlays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

OverQoS: Offering QoS using Overlays

Description:

N-TCP pipe. Step 1: Aggregate Loss and Bandwidth Control. Flow 2. Flow 1 ... media server, Leasing overlay networks, Pipe abstraction for large institutions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Lakshmin4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OverQoS: Offering QoS using Overlays


1
OverQoS Offering QoS using Overlays
  • Lakshmi
  • Sahara Retreat, 2003

2
What is OverQoS?
  • Embed QoS functionality in Internet via overlays
  • Overlay nodes implement QoS functions
  • No support needed from IP routers
  • Challenges
  • Nodes not connected to congested points,
  • have no control over cross-traffic
  • cannot avoid losses (reducing sending rate
    doesnt help!)
  • Why Overlays?
  • Previous QoS architectures have yet to be
    deployed
  • Overlay-model empowers third-party providers to
    provide some form of QoS

3
How does OverQoS work?
  • Step 1 Aggregate Loss and Bandwidth Control

4
How does OverQoS work?
  • Step 3 Provide QoS guarantees (bandwidth,loss)
    to a
  • flow by stitching guarantees on overlay links.
  • Step 4 How to perform QoS-routing of multiple
    flows
  • with different requirements on an overlay
    network?
  • Challenge Links with varying bandwidth, loss
  • Ongoing work!

5
Controlled-Loss Virtual Link (CLVL)
  • Two parameters
  • Statistical bound on loss rate, q (lt p
    typically ltlt p)
  • Capacity, c(t), possibly time-varying
  • Can prove if offered load lt c(t), then loss rate
    lt q
  • How is c(t) determined?
  • Given f(t) to be the redundancy factor
  • c(t) b(t)( 1- f(t))

Flow 1
b(t), p(t)
Flow 2
Flow n
OverQos Node
6
OverQoS Services, Customers
OverQoS Customers Streaming media server,
Leasing overlay networks, Pipe abstraction for
large institutions
7
(No Transcript)
8
Extractable Bandwidth
9
What bandwidth guarantees?
10
Conclusions
  • Inferences from our study
  • FECARQ has better overhead characteristics than
    FEC-based CLVL implementation
  • Loss recovery is not possible during large
    periods of bursts
  • OverQoS can be used to provide some form of
    statistical bandwidth guarantees
  • Limitations
  • Need more statistical measurements across overlay
    links
  • Many overlay links (except cable modems) are not
    lossy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com