Title: Aggregate Expenditure and Aggregate Demand
1Aggregate Expenditure and Aggregate Demand
2Aggregate Expenditure and Income
- Each dollar spent on production translates
directly into a dollar of aggregate income
RememberGDP equals aggregate income - Investment, government purchases, and net exports
are autonomous, independent of the level of
income (some of this will be relaxed in later
chapters).
3Aggregate Expenditures
- Equals the amount that households, firms,
governments, and the rest of the world plan to
spend on U.S. output at each level of real GDP - Consumption, C
- Planned investment, I
- Government purchases, G
- Net exports, X M
- Consumption is the only spending component that
varies with the level of real GDP
4Aggregate Expenditures
- Planned investment amount of investment that
firms plan to undertake during a year - Actual investment amount of investment actually
undertaken equals planned investment plus
unplanned changes in inventories - Whats left over??? Its unplanned
investmentthis is an increase or decrease in
inventories that is not anticipatedSALE!!!
5Exhibit 1 Real GDP with Net Taxes and
Government Purchases (trillions of dollars)
Autonomous
- Suppose the price level in the economy is 130,
30 higher than in the base year. - Can we calculate the MPS and MPC from this table?
(the answer is yes). - This table presents the information that is
needed on the various components of aggregate
demand and expenditure MPC is 4/5 and the MPS is
1/5
6Exhibit 1 Real GDP with Net Taxes and
Government Purchases (trillions of dollars)
- Government purchases equals net taxes
governments budget is balanced - The final column lists any unplanned inventory
adjustment equals real GDP minus planned
aggregate expenditures - When the amount of planned spending equals the
amount produced, there are no unplanned inventory
adjustments. Here, this occurs where planned
aggregate expenditures and real GDP equal 12.0
trillion
7Exhibit 1 Real GDP with Net Taxes and
Government Purchases (trillions of dollars)
- When real GDP is 11 trillion, planned aggregate
expenditure is 11.2, which exceeds the amount
produced by 0.2 trillion - Firms rely upon inventories to make up the
shortfall (unplanned inventory investment of
-0.2) and respond by increasing output
8Exhibit 1 Real GDP with Net Taxes and
Government Purchases (trillions of dollars)
- If the amount produced exceeds planned spending,
firms get stuck with unsold goods unplanned
increases in inventories, however for now, they
arent allowed to reduce prices to sell the
excess inventorieswhat do they adjust???
Production! - When real GDP is 13 trillion, planned aggregate
expenditure is only 12.8, and 0.2 trillion in
output remains unsold - Firms, under the assumption of a fixed price
level, respond by cutting output
9Real GDP Demanded
- The aggregate expenditure line shows the
relationship, for a given price level, of planned
spending at each income, or real GDP. - The total of C, I, G, and (X - M) at each income
level, or real GDP. - Each row in the table above represents a single
point on the AE line.
10Real GDP Demanded
- From this we develop the Income-expenditure
model a relationship between aggregate income
and aggregate spending that determines, for a
given price level, where spending (AE) is equal
to the amount produced (GDP).
11Exhibit 2 Deriving the Real GDP Demanded for a
Given Price Level
- 45 degree line identifies all points where
planned expenditure real GDP - Planned aggregate expenditure is measured on the
vertical axis. - Aggregate output demanded at any given price
level occurs where real GDP equals planned
aggregate expenditures, at point e
12Exhibit 2 Deriving the Real GDP Demanded for a
Given Price Level
C I G (X M)
- Consider what happens when real GDP is initially
less than 12 trillion, say 11 trillion.
Planned aggregate expenditures of 11.2 trillion
(point b) exceeds output by 0.2 trillion - Because we assume prices will remain constant,
firms will reduce inventories - But unplanned inventory reductions cannot
continue indefinitely firms will increase
employment increasing income, increasing
consumer spending. This process will continue
until planned spending equals real GDP at point e.
Aggregate expenditure (trillions of dollars)
AE(b)gtGDP(a)
45º
0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
13Exhibit 2 Deriving Aggregate Output
- When aggregate expenditures exceed real GDP, for
example at 13.0, planned spending (point c)
falls short of production (point d). - Since real GDP exceeds the amount people want to
spend, unsold goods accumulate by 0.2 trillion
more than firms planned - Rather than allow inventories to pile up
indefinitely, firms reduce production, which
reduces employment and income.
AE(c)ltGDP(d)
d
13.0
12.8
c
C I G (X M)
Aggregate expenditure (trillions of dollars)
45º
13.0
0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
14Exhibit 2 The Real GDP Demanded for a Given
Price Level
- At a given price level, any movement away from e
will result in adjustments in inventories,
employment, income and finally consumption to
bring the economy back to point e, where
expenditures output.
15Exhibit 3 Shifting the AE Line(The Effect of an
Increase in Investment)
- Investment increases by 0.1 trillion
- Upward shift of the AE line means that at initial
real GDP level of 12 trillion, planned spending
exceeds output by 0.1 trillion (the distance
between points e and f) - Reduced inventories prompt firms to expand
production by 100 billion (movement from f to g ) - Those who receive the additional 100 billion
spend 80 on goods (movement from g to h) - Firms respond by increasing output again
(movement from h to i) - This 80 billion will stimulate new spending of
64 billion (moving from i to j), which causes
firms to increase output, yet again (from j to k,
etc.) - The initial infusion of 0.1 trillion (or 100
billion) increases output by 0.5 trillion (or
500 million)!!!
)
C I G (X M)
s
r
a
l
l
o
12.5
d
f
C I' G (X M)
o
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
r
t
(
f
e
r
12.1
u
g
t
i
d
12.0
e
n
e
p
x
e
e
0.1
t
a
g
e
r
g
45º
g
A
0
12.0
12.5
Real GDP
(trillions of dollars)
16Exhibit 4Tracking the Rounds of Spending
Following a 100Billion Increase in investment
(billions of dollars)
8
?
- Exhibit 4 summarizes the multiplier process,
showing the first three rounds, round ten, and
the cumulative effect of all rounds - The new spending generated in each round is shown
in the second column and the accumulation of new
spending appears in the third column - Total new spending after 10 rounds sums to 446.3
billion - But calculating the exact total would require us
to work through an infinite series of
roundsthere is a shortcut.
17Simple Spending Multiplier
- Refers to the factor by which real GDP demanded
changes for a given initial change in spending - Simple Spending Multiplier 1/(1MPC)
- In our example, the MPC 0.8 ? a multiplier of 5
- Initial increase in investment spending of 100
billion will eventually boost real GDP demanded
by 5 times this amount, or 500 billion
18Simple Spending Multiplier
- The multiplier depends on the value of the MPC
- Specifically, the larger the fraction of an
increase in income that is spent each round, the
larger the spending multiplier ? the larger the
MPC, the larger the simple multiplier - With an MPC of 0.8, the multiplier is 5
- With an MPC of 0.9, the multiplier is 10
- With an MPC of 0.75, the multiplier is 4
19Simple Spending Multiplier
- Simple spending multiplier 1 / MPS
- In our example, the multiplier process started
because of an increase in investment, but the
same impact would occur if any one of the
components of aggregate expenditures changed, (C,
I, G, or X-M) - If the higher level of planned investment is not
sustained in future years, real GDP would fall
back and the multiplier process would work in
reverse, reducing GDP by a multiple effect.
20Spending Multiplier Whats its importance
- Its used in all types of economic development
work. The reason we provide incentives for
industry to locate in GA is that investment
dollars are multiplied in our economy. - We use a similar multiplier to estimate the
effect of new industries locating in our area.
21Spending Multiplier Air Travel after 9/11
- Lets think of a specific example of how the
multiplier works after a specific event. - After 9/11 very few people were flying.
- Immediate layoffs
- Investment in aircraft falls
- Income falls in airline jobs and any industry
supporting airlines - Airline workers spend less on groceries
- Businesses throughout the economy see sales fall
- More jobs are lost in unrelated industries
- and, so on
22Another way of Deriving the Aggregate Demand Curve
- What happens to the aggregate expenditure line if
the price level changes - For each price level there is a specific
aggregate expenditure line which yields a unique
real GDP demanded, so a change in price level
shifts the AE line. - By altering the price level, we can derive the
aggregate demand curve in a different way than we
learned previously.
23A Higher Price Level
- What is the effect of a higher price level on the
economys aggregate expenditure line and, in
turn, on real GDP demanded? - A higher price level
- reduces consumption because it reduces the real
value of dollar-denominated assets (i.e., cash
holdings) held by householdspeople feel poorer. - An increasing price level increases the market
rate of interest, which reduces investment - An increasing price level makes U.S. goods
relatively more expensive abroad imports rise
and exports fall - All of these results in an inward shift in AE.
24Exhibit 5 Income-Expenditure and Aggregate Demand
(a) Income-expenditure model
Aggregate expenditure (trillions of dollars)
- In panel (a), the AE function intersects the 45
degree line at point e to yield 12 trillion in
real GDP demanded - Panel b shows that when the price level is 130,
real GDP demanded is 12 trillion and we have one
point on the aggregate demand curve, e
45
0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
(b) Aggregate demand curve
140
Price level
0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
25Exhibit 5 Income-Expenditure and Aggregate Demand
- If the price level increases to 140, the increase
in the price level reduces consumption, planned
investment, and net exports as shown by the
downward shift of the aggregate expenditure line
from AE to AE' and real GDP demanded declines
from 12 trillion to 11.5 trillion - If the price level falls, the opposite occurs
consumption, investment, and net exports increase
at each real GDP - The AE function shifts to AE' real GDP increases
to 12.5 trillion - Connecting these three equilibrium points yields
the AD curve
AE" (P 120)
e"
AE (P 130)
AE' (P 140)
Aggregate expenditure (trillions of dollars)
e
(a) Income-expenditure model
e'
45
12.5
0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
11.5
12.0
26Aggregate Demand and Expenditures
- The aggregate expenditure line and the aggregate
demand curve portray real output from different
perspectives - The aggregate expenditure line shows, for a given
price level, how planned spending relates to the
level of real GDP in the economy - The aggregate demand curve shows, for various
price levels, the quantities of real GDP demanded
27Multiplier and Aggregate Demand
- Suppose we return to the situation where the
price level is assumed to be constant - What we want to do now is trace through the
effects of a shift in any of the components of
spending on aggregate demand, while assuming that
the price level does not change, e.g., we want to
look at the multiplier and shifts in aggregate
demand
28Exhibit 6 Shifts in Aggregate Expenditures and
Aggregate Demand
C I G (X M)
- At a price level of 130, the aggregate
expenditure line intersects the 45 degree line at
point e in panel (a), and yields point e on the
aggregate demand curve in panel (b) - When one component of aggregate expenditure
increases and the price level remains constant,
the aggregate demand curve shifts from AD to AD'
and the new point of equilibrium is shown as e
in both panels
(a) Income-expenditure model
Aggregate expenditure (trillions of dollars)
e
45º
0
12.0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
(b) Aggregate demand curve
e'
e
130
Price level
AD
0
12.0
Real GDP (trillions of dollars)
29Limitations of the Multiplier
- Once aggregate supply is incorporated into the
analysis, changes in the price level reduce the
impact of the multiplier - Leakages such as higher income taxes and
increased spending on imports all reduce the size
of the multiplier - The spending multiplier takes time to work itself
out, the process does not occur instantly