Title: WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades
1WisDOTs Policy on Select Materials in Subgrades
- Frozen Four Workshop
- Madison, WI
- October 8, 2008
2Presentation Highlights
- Brief History and Introduction of WisDOT Select
Materials Policy - Design Details and Information
- Recent Research Findings
3Historical Background
- Mid-90s Subgrade Process Review
- Address Cost Over-runs Attributed to Soils
- Team Established - Findings
- Greatest subgrade stress during construction
- Few subgrade problems after paving
- Do what is necessary to pave roadway
- Change orders during construction are costly in
time and money - About 2/3 of state has difficult soils
4Historical Background Contd.
- Recommendations From Study Team
- Developed list of 22 items
- Use of select materials in subgrades ranked as
highest priority - Assemble a team to investigate further and
provide guidance
5Historical Background Contd.
- Departmental Directions Team Goals
- Use select materials in the upper portion
- of subgrades
- Limit the use to areas of difficult soils
- Provide details/guidance for usage
- Develop WisDOT policy for inclusion in
- design manual (FDM)
6Historical Background Contd.
- Results of Team Discussions
- Eight different methods/options of materials
- Desire for all alternatives to provide
- equivalent performance
- Selection of particular alternative is based
- on local conditions/availability /cost and
- identified in the soils report
- Estimate total impacts/costs
- to the Department
7Areas of Inclusion
8Select Material Alternatives
- Breaker Run Stone
- Breaker Run Stone w/Geogrid
- Grade 1 Granular Backfill
- Grade 2 Granular Backfill or Select Borrow
- Pit Run Sand and Gravel
- Pit Run Sand and Gravel w/Geogrid
- Flyash, Lime, Cement Stabilization
- Salvage Materials or Industrial By-products
- with optional Geogrid
-
9Breaker Run Stone
10Breaker Run Stone
- Crushed Material From Quarry Face
- Processed Through the Primary Crusher
- Acceptance Based On Visual Inspection
- Desire At least One Fracture Face on 50
- of the R 1½ Material
- Approximate Gradation -
- Sieve Percent Passing
- 5 100
- 1½ 20 - 50
- 10 0 - 10
11Granular Backfills
12Grade 1 2 Granular Backfills
- Generally Sand Materials
- Gradations -
- Maximum Percent Passing
- Sieve Grade 1 Grade 2
- 4 100 100
- 40 75 -
- 100 15 30
- 200 8 15
13Pit Run Sand and Gravel
14Pit Run Sand and Gravel
- Obtained From Naturally Occurring Sand and Gravel
Deposits - Minimum 50 Retained on 1½ Sieve
- Approximate Gradation -
- Sieve Percent Passing
- 6 100
- 2 0 - 75
- 10 0 - 40
15Stabilization and Recycled Matls
16Drainage Implications
- Drainage Concern With Thick Layers
- Do Not Want to Create Bath-tub Sections
- Complicated By Different Thicknesses
- Special Cross-section Details Developed
- Daylight Where Possible
- Drains Where Necessary
17Policy Guidelines
- Use in Upper Portion of Subgrades Constructed in
Difficult Soils as Shown on Plans Begin 2006 - Will be Used in Identified Areas Unless Exception
Justified in Soils Report - Will Not be Used in Areas Outside of Identified
Areas Unless Justification is Provided - Soils Report Will Provide Recommendation of
Appropriate Alternative Material - May be Used in Segments of Project (2000-3000)
18Policy Guidelines Contd.
- Use on Projects With Significant Earthwork
Volumes - Will be Used in Both Cuts and Fills (Some
exceptions for rock or dense cut areas) - One of Eight Alternative Designs Should be
Selected and Shown on the Plan - Appropriate Bid Items Included in Plan
- Considered Part of Subgrade
- Must Adjust Earthwork Quantities
- Account For in Pavement Design
19Incorporating Benefits Into Pavement Design
- Primary Purpose is to Facilitate Construction
- Recognize that Subgrade is Improved
- Realize That Some Benefit to Pavement Structure
- Alternatives Reduce pavement structure or
extend pavement life - Investigated Methods to Account for Benefits
20WisDOT Pavement Design
- Using Outdated AASHTO 1972 Methods
- Compute Structural Numbers Using
- Soil Support Value (SSV) for asphalt
- Subgrade Modulus (k) for concrete
- Soil Strength Numbers Arrived at Using DGI
System, Based on Soil Pedology - Separate PCC and HMA Design Methods
- Moving to New AASHTO MEPDG
21Asphalt Pavement Design
Subgrade Strength Based on DGI and Correlated to
SSV
22Concrete Pavement Design
- Compute Pavement Thickness Using Standard Design
Procedures - Deduct ½ inch From Computed Thickness
- Recommendations Based on Sensitivity Analyses
23Estimated Costs (For Planning)
Alternative Cost/Mile Breaker
Run Stone 110 k Breaker Run Stone
w/Geogrid 150 k Grade 1 Granular
Backfill 95 k Grade 2 Granular
Backfill or 95 k Select
Borrow Pit Run Sand and Gravel 105
k Pit Run Sand and Gravel 145 k
w/Geogrid Flyash, Lime, Cement Stabilization
90 k Salvage Materials or Industrial
100 k By-products Late-90s
24Cost/Benefit
- Est. Cost for Policy is 8 M - (180 Lane Miles)
- Cost offset by reduced bid prices
- Reduction in contractor claims
- Reductions in contract administration costs
- Other Benefits
- Reduction in structural pavement designs
- Provides solid base for paving operations
- Reduction in future pavement rehab. costs
25Recent Research In Area
- Five Recent Research Projects With UW-Madison
- One deals with geosynthetic reinforcement
- Two deal with industrial byproducts/flyash
- Two deal with equivalency of alternatives and
inclusion into pavement design - Implementation Study
26Summary of Recent Research
- Major Findings
- Provided recommended material thicknesses
- Provided recommended modulus and layer
coefficients for pavement design - Added geogrid-reinforced alternatives
- Deleted breaker run geogrid option
- Provided geogrid property recommendations
- Investigated specific recycled and
- stabilized materials
27Research Recommendations
28Future Directions
- Review/Analyze Research Findings
- Compare to Existing Knowledge/Guidelines
- Potential Adoption of Results - Revision of
Existing Guidelines - Continue Use of Select Materials
29Questions/Comments ??