The past really is a different country - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

The past really is a different country

Description:

... more and interact more and are less parochial I think, because I know when you ... are more parochial, they just don't integrate, they just don't have any ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: surr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The past really is a different country


1
The past really is a different country
  • Lesley Storey PhD Evanthia Lyons PhD
  • SPERI, University of Surrey

2
Methods 1
  • Interviews lasted between 35 minutes and 1 hour,
    15 minutes
  • Audio tape-recorded and transcribed in full
  • Analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological
    Analysis (IPA) (Smith, 1996).
  • All conducted by same researcher

3
Methods 2
  • This paper is based on a study which consisted of
    an interview based around a sorting task.
  • This was done with two groups of British people
    British-born UK citizens of African Caribbean
    descent and heritage and White UK citizens.

4
Interview Study
  • All participants were asked to choose an era or
    event which had been critical in shaping modern
    Britain and to explain why they felt it had been
    so important.
  • They were also asked to state whether they felt
    that this had been a positive or negative effect.
  • Time lines have been constructed to show
    graphically the events identified.

5
Aim of Time Line analysis
  • The time line analysis aims to address the
    following questions
  • To what extent is the factual history shared?
  • To what extent are the interpretations/readings
    of history shared?

6
Time Line (All participants)
  • Roman Invasion
  • William the Conqueror
  • Industrial Revolution
  • Empire
  • The Victorians
  • Second World War
  • Post war non-White immigration/Windrush
  • 60s Black Civil Rights
  • Murder of Blair Peach
  • Thatcherism
  • 80s race riots
  • Murder of Stephen Lawrence
  • New Labour Victory

7
Time Line (Black participants)
  • William the Conqueror
  • Industrial Revolution
  • Empire
  • The Victorians
  • Post WW2 non-White immigration / Windrush
  • 60s Black Civil Rights
  • World Cup victory
  • Murder of Blair Peach
  • Thatcherism
  • 80s race riots
  • Murder of Stephen Lawrence

8
Time Line (White Participants)
  • Roman Invasion
  • Second World War
  • Social changes of 60s 70s
  • New Labour Victory (1997)

9
Shared past?
  • Common events identified by both White and Black,
    similar eras are identified but the significance
    of the era is different.
  • For the White sample we have a timeframe covering
    the full chronological period up to the present
    day picking economic, political and military
    events.
  • For the Black sample, the emphasis is far more on
    recent events and specifically events which have
    occurred since the large-scale post-war
    immigration of Black people into the UK, the
    events are also far more personal with two murder
    victims being mentioned by name.

10
To what extent is the factual history shared?1
social changes of the 60s
  • V umm the 60s, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X
    and all that
  • I so the sort of effect of that American change
    on on? And what sort of changes do you feel it
    made?
  • V well, in like at school the history work that
    we did do was like where like the Black people
    had to sit at the back of the bus and wasnt
    given the right to go into places where White
    people were or anywhere and I think that was
    completely wrong because they was all uman just
    skin colour thats different thats it, so I
    think I dont even know how I would, how I would
    even respond if it was like that now, but
    probably be no difference if it hadnt changed
    but thank God for that
  • I so in a sense you feel like youre personally
    benefiting from that time period?
  • V yeah I think every every Black person would
  • v
  • DPR I mean I was I was perhaps doesnt feel
    like an event but the sort of late 60s 70s umm
    feel of change in society is probably something
    that I see as quite important, maybe thats
    associated with err what I said earlier about
    perhaps what I feel is a lessening in class,
    broadening in tolerance in some ways umm in
    limited ways actually but umm and perhaps I mean
    you know associated with that some of the
    breakdowns in terms of umm roles of the
    traditional family, increasing acceptance of umm
    not needing to get married, not needing to have
    the 2 children I think its quite an important
    change in society

11
To what extent is the factual history shared?2
WW2
  • Similarly the Second World War/Immediate post-war
    era was mentioned by both Black and White but
    with different elements being identified as
    important.
  • DPR well I suppose the one that immediately
    jumps to mind is the second world war and the
    enormous effect that had on my parents
    generation
  • I mm hmm
  • DPR umm in terms of umm both in terms of what
    theyve said and people of their generation have
    said in terms of political change in the way umm
    society was thought about but also a sort of a
    bringing together in terms of joint hardship type
    thing ummin my own personal experience umman
    event .
  • V
  • CT yeah definitely, the war itself I think that
    umm the influx of more immigrants, definitely umm
    yeah take it back absolutely.I suppose its kind
    of hard, I sppose its things like that I guess

12
Themes (Black participants)
  • Theme 1 - Race-specific events/eras with racial
    consequences.
  • Theme 2 - Race neutral or generic events from
    which racial consequences or implications are
    drawn.
  • Theme 3 - Non racially-oriented events with no
    race-specific consequences.

13
Theme 1 - Race-specific events/eras with racial
consequences.
  • CT yeah, it was I mean it actually shows how
    the relationship between white and black people
    has changed, I mean it was so overtly racist and
    now it has changed and the amount of Black people
    who were killed it was so explicit and up until
    the death of Stephen Lawrence, I think it has
    been a watershed because I think it was, I think
    that white societys consciousness has been
    raised umm and I think that has a lot to do with
    just time that the white kids these days because
    they mix more and interact more and are less
    parochial I think, because I know when you go
    further out in the country people are more
    parochial, they just dont integrate, they just
    dont have any understanding of the other and so
    people in mixed marriages and so on are not, its
    much more of a normal thing now at least in some
    parts of London and some parts of England so I
    think because of that its forcing people to
    challenge the old way of looking at things as
    well so I think yeah I think the death of Stephen
    Lawrence I think was quite a big umm social event
    I think.

14
Theme 2 - Race neutral or generic events from
which racial consequences or implications are
drawn
  • I ok, and thinking about sort of Britain now in
    the early part of the 21st century, if you had to
    pick either a time period or a particular event
    from the past thats been sort of absolutely you
    know pivotal in making Britain what it is now,
    which would you pick?
  • ED - industrial revolution
  • I mm hmm why would you pick that one?
  • ED - .the period leading up to it is when the
    institutions came into being, banks, insurance,
    the slave trade, institutions have developed
    forging a sort of a can-do mentality, umm we rule
    the world type attitude and it laid it laid the
    foundations for the institutions that are still
    running and still umm still running the show now,
    so yeah that would be the sort of thing, that
    would be the era.

15
Theme 3 - Non racially-oriented events with no
race-specific consequences
  • I ok, and umm you talked a bit about things
    that have gone on in the past, if you had to pick
    from history or even more recent events one
    either an event or a period of time that you feel
    has been critical in making Britain the country
    it is now, which would you choose?
  • SH - ..umm the industrial revolution because
    although all of the you know many other periods
    could you know deal with things that evoke more
    emotion, umm the very fact that we got division
    of labour, 9 to 5 working days umm and all the
    toasters in our kitchen all this sort of stuff
    all sprang from there and thats what people deal
    with on a daily basis, so however mundane it is,
    thats probably it.

16
Themes (White participants)
  • Theme 1 - maintaining group boundaries and
    in-group positive esteem
  • Theme 2 no relationship between sub-groups and
    pivotal events
  • Theme 3 - concept of threat.

17
Theme 1 - maintaining group boundaries and
in-group positive esteem
  • KF oh Lord I should come up with something
    really intellectual like well I think it was the
    1834 Poor Law amendment act (laughing), well
    failing that one umm oh I dont know World War 2,
    I should think possibly because there are enough
    people around who remember that to have it affect
    on how the world is now.
  • I right and when you think of how thats sort
    of had an effect on how things are now, is it
    because those people are still around or is it
    because or particular changes?
  • I so its continuity?
  • KF yes, because those people are still around
    and they all remember it, it accounts for my view
    that Germanys violent when it isnt at all
    (laughing) umm and I dont know and I think an
    approach to situations sort of that sort of
    feeling that the world could suddenly become
    undone if youre not careful

18
Theme 2 no relationship between sub-groups and
pivotal events
  • Whites tended not to identify pivotal events
    relating to sectional interests of their own
    sub-groups eg class, gender, sexual orientation
    despite making references to the importance of
    these affiliations elsewhere in the interviews.

19
Theme 3 - concept of threat.
  • This was a recognition that the race of the
    interviewer may have prompted a defensive
    response in participants. In contrast to the
    Black participants.
  • The White interviewees tended to have a more
    positive representation of Britain and
    Britishness.
  • They assigned negative characteristics to the
    British past and emphasised positive changes over
    time using a discourse of progress.
  • They also made external attributions for negative
    qualities or behaviours either through linguistic
    form or by associating negative behaviours with
    people unlike themselves.

20
Does it matter?
  • In December 2003, the UK Black poet Benjamin
    Zephaniah refused an OBE from the Queen because
    of his perception of the honours links with
    colonialism and slavery.
  • Upon receipt of the letter informing him of the
    Award, Mr. Benjamin Zephaniah wrote Me? I
    thought, OBE me? Up yours, I thought. I get angry
    when I hear that word "empire" it reminds me of
    slavery, it reminds of thousands of years of
    brutality, it reminds me of how my foremothers
    were raped and my forefathers brutalised. It is
    because of this concept of empire that my British
    education led me to believe that the history of
    black people started with slavery and that we
    were born slaves, and should therefore be
    grateful that we were given freedom by our caring
    white masters ...

21
Other possible explanations
  • A clash between his Rastafarian religious values
    and the acceptance of a secular honour
  • An anti-monarchist personal stance
  • Against his political or moral code
  • Only for toilet cleaners

22
Theoretical implications
  • Difficult to look at issues such as alienation
    only in the present tense
  • Issues of identity benefit from a social memory
    perspective
  • Past has different resonances for different
    groups
  • Without engagement with the meaning of the past
    opportunities for dialogue are limited.

23
Conclusion 1
  • Difficult question for some interviewees
  • Requires a degree of historical knowledge but
    historical inaccuracy is not a problem
  • Requires some degree of articulacy in
    participants
  • Needs larger scale study with matched
    participants

24
Conclusion 2
  • Pivotal event question generates data not
    otherwise accessible
  • Qualitative analysis of this type of data raises
    new issues
  • New type of data for social memory theories
  • Would benefit from larger-scale study in its own
    right

25
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com