Producing Data: Sampling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Producing Data: Sampling

Description:

Researchers often want to answer questions about some large group of individuals ... an alternative school--public, private, or parochial--of the parents' choosing? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: james221
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Producing Data: Sampling


1
Chapter 7
  • Producing Data Sampling

2
Population and Sample
  • Researchers often want to answer questions about
    some large group of individuals (this group is
    called the population)
  • Often the researchers cannot measure (or survey)
    all individuals in the population, so they
    measure a subset of individuals that is chosen to
    represent the entire population (this subset is
    called a sample)
  • The researchers then use statistical techniques
    to make conclusions about the population based on
    the sample

3
How Data are Obtained
  • Observational Study
  • Observes individuals and measures variables of
    interest but does not attempt to influence the
    responses
  • Describes some group or situation
  • Sample surveys are observational studies
  • Experiment
  • Deliberately imposes some treatment on
    individuals in order to observe their responses
  • Studies whether the treatment causes change in
    the response.

4
Experiment versusObservational Study
  • Both typically have the goal of detecting a
    relationship between the explanatory and response
    variables.
  • Experiment
  • create differences in the explanatory variable
    and examine any resulting changes in the response
    variable (cause-and-effect conclusion)
  • Observational Study
  • observe differences in the explanatory variable
    and notice any related differences in the
    response variable (association between variables)

5
Why Not Always Use an Experiment?
  • Sometimes it is unethical or impossible to assign
    people to receive a specific treatment.
  • Certain explanatory variables, such as handedness
    or gender, are inherent traits and cannot be
    randomly assigned.

6
Confounding
  • The problem
  • in addition to the explanatory variable of
    interest, there may be other variables
    (explanatory or lurking) that make the groups
    being studied different from each other
  • the impact of these variables cannot be separated
    from the impact of the explanatory variable on
    the response

7
Confounding
  • The solution
  • Experiment randomize experimental units to
    receive different treatments (possible
    confounding variables should even out across
    groups)
  • Observational Study measure potential
    confounding variables and determine if they have
    an impact on the response(may then adjust for
    these variables in the statistical analysis)

8
Question
A recent newspaper article concluded that smoking
marijuana at least three times a week resulted in
lower grades in college. How do you think the
researchers came to this conclusion? Do you
believe it? Is there a more reasonable
conclusion?
9
Case Study
The Effect of Hypnosis on the Immune System
reported in Science News, Sept. 4, 1993, p. 153
10
Case Study
The Effect of Hypnosis on the Immune System
Objective To determine if hypnosis strengthens
the disease-fighting capacity of immune cells.
11
Case Study
  • 65 college students.
  • 33 easily hypnotized
  • 32 not easily hypnotized
  • white blood cell counts measured
  • all students viewed a brief video about the
    immune system.

12
Case Study
  • Students randomly assigned to one of three
    conditions
  • subjects hypnotized, given mental exercise
  • subjects relaxed in sensory deprivation tank
  • control group (no treatment)

13
Case Study
  • white blood cell counts re-measured after one
    week
  • the two white blood cell counts are compared for
    each group
  • results
  • hypnotized group showed larger jump in white
    blood cells
  • easily hypnotized group showed largest immune
    enhancement

14
Case Study
The Effect of Hypnosis on the Immune System
What is the population? What is the sample?
15
Case Study
The Effect of Hypnosis on the Immune System
Is this an experiment or an observational study?
16
Case Study
The Effect of Hypnosis on the Immune System
Does hypnosis and mental exercise affect the
immune system?
17
Case Study
Weight Gain Spells Heart Risk for Women
Weight, weight change, and coronary heart
disease in women. W.C. Willett, et. al., vol.
273(6), Journal of the American Medical
Association, Feb. 8, 1995. (Reported in Science
News, Feb. 4, 1995, p. 108)
18
Case Study
Weight Gain Spells Heart Risk for Women
Objective To recommend a range of body mass
index (a function of weight and height) in terms
of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in women.
19
Case Study
  • Study started in 1976 with 115,818 women aged 30
    to 55 years and without a history of previous
    CHD.
  • Each womans weight (body mass) was determined
  • Each woman was asked her weight at age 18.

20
Case Study
  • The cohort of women were followed for 14 years.
  • The number of CHD (fatal and nonfatal) cases were
    counted (1292 cases).
  • Results were adjusted for other variables
    (smoking, family history, menopausal status,
    post-menopausal hormone use).

21
Case Study
  • Results compare those who gained less than 11
    pounds (from age 18 to current age) to the
    others.
  • 11 to 17 lbs 25 more likely to develop heart
    disease
  • 17 to 24 lbs 64 more likely
  • 24 to 44 lbs 92 more likely
  • more than 44 lbs 165 more likely

22
Case Study
Weight Gain Spells Heart Risk for Women
What is the population? What is the sample?
23
Case Study
Weight Gain Spells Heart Risk for Women
Is this an experiment or an observational study?
24
Case Study
Weight Gain Spells Heart Risk for Women
Does weight gain in women increase their risk for
CHD?
25
Bad Sampling Designs
  • Voluntary response sampling
  • allowing individuals to choose to be in the
    sample
  • Convenience sampling
  • selecting individuals that are easiest to reach
  • Both of these techniques are biased
  • systematically favor certain outcomes

26
Voluntary Response
  • To prepare for her book Women and Love, Shere
    Hite sent questionnaires to 100,000 women asking
    about love, sex, and relationships.
  • 4.5 responded
  • Hite used those responses to write her book
  • Moore (Statistics Concepts and Controversies,
    1997) noted
  • respondents were fed up with men and eager to
    fight them
  • the anger became the theme of the book
  • but angry women are more likely to respond

27
Convenience Sampling
  • Sampling mice from a large cage to study how a
    drug affects physical activity
  • lab assistant reaches into the cage to select the
    mice one at a time until 10 are chosen
  • Which mice will likely be chosen?
  • could this sample yield biased results?

28
Simple Random Sampling
  • Each individual in the population has the same
    chance of being chosen for the sample
  • Each group of individuals (in the population) of
    the required size (n) has the same chance of
    being the sample actually selected
  • Random selection
  • drawing names out of a hat
  • table of random digits
  • computer software

29
Table of Random Digits
  • Table B on pg. 654 of text
  • each entry is equally likely to be any of the 10
    digits 0 through 9
  • entries are independent of each other (knowledge
    of one entry gives no information about any other
    entries)
  • each pair of entries is equally likely to be any
    of the 100 pairs 00, 01,, 99
  • each triple of entries is equally likely to be
    any of the 1000 values 000, 001, , 999

30
Choosing a Simple Random Sample (SRS)
  • STEP 1 Label each individual in the population
  • STEP 2 Use Table B to select labels at random

31
Probability Sample
  • a sample chosen by chance
  • must know what samples are possible and what
    chance, or probability, each possible sample has
    of being selected
  • a SRS gives each member of the population an
    equal chance to be selected

32
Stratified Random Sample
  • first divide the population into groups of
    similar individuals, called strata
  • second, choose a separate SRS in each stratum
  • third, combine these SRSs to form the full sample

33
Stratified Random SampleExample
  • Suppose a university has the following student
    demographics
  • Undergraduate Graduate First Professional
    Special
  • 55 20
    5 20

A stratified random sample of 100 students could
be chosen as follows select a SRS of 55
undergraduates, a SRS of 20 graduates, a SRS of 5
first professional students, and a SRS of 20
special students combine these 100 students.
34
Multistage Sample
  • several stages of sampling are carried out
  • useful for large-scale sample surveys
  • samples at each stage may be SRSs, but are often
    stratified
  • stages may involve other random sampling
    techniques as well (cluster, systematic, random
    digit dialing, )

35
Cautions about Sample Surveys
  • Undercoverage
  • some individuals or groups in the population are
    left out of the process of choosing the sample
  • Nonresponse
  • individuals chosen for the sample cannot be
    contacted or refuse to cooperate/respond
  • Response bias
  • behavior of respondent or interviewer may lead to
    inaccurate answers or measurements
  • Wording of questions
  • confusing or leading (biased) questions words
    with different meanings

36
Nonresponse
  • To prepare for her book Women and Love, Shere
    Hite sent questionnaires to 100,000 women asking
    about love, sex, and relationships.
  • 4.5 responded
  • Hite used those responses to write her book
  • angry women are more likely to respond

37
Response Bias
  • A door-to-door survey is being conducted to
    determine drug use (past or present) of members
    of the community. Respondents may give socially
    acceptable answers (maybe not the truth!)
  • For this survey on drug use, would it matter if a
    police officer is conducting the interview?
    (bias from interviewer)

38
Asking the UninformedWashington Post National
Weekly Edition (April 10-16, 1995, p. 36)
Response Bias
  • A 1978 poll done in Cincinnati asked people
    whether they favored or opposed repealing the
    1975 Public Affairs Act.
  • There was no such act!
  • About one third of those asked expressed an
    opinion about it.

39
Wording of Questions
A newsletter distributed by a politician to his
constituents gave the results of a nationwide
survey on Americans attitudes about a variety of
educational issues. One of the questions asked
was, Should your legislature adopt a policy to
assist children in failing schools to opt out of
that school and attend an alternative
school--public, private, or parochial--of the
parents choosing? From the wording of this
question, can you speculate on what answer was
desired? Explain.
40
Wording Deliberate Bias
  • If you found a wallet with 20 in it, would you
    return the money?
  • If you found a wallet with 20 in it, would you
    do the right thing and return the money?

41
Wording Unintentional Bias
  • I have taught several students over the past few
    years.
  • How many students do you think I have taught?
  • How many years am I referring to?
  • Over the past few days, how many servings of
    fruit have you eaten?
  • How many days are you considering?
  • What constitutes a serving?

42
Wording Unnecessary Complexity
  • Do you sometimes find that you have arguments
    with your family members and co-workers?
  • Arguments with family members
  • Arguments with co-workers

43
Wording Ordering of Questions
  • How often do you normally go out on a date?
    about ___ times a month.
  • How happy are you with life in general.
  • Strong association between these questions.
  • If the ordering is reversed, then there would be
    no strong association between these questions

44
Inferences about the Population
  • Values calculated from samples are used to make
    conclusions (inferences) about unknown values in
    the population
  • Variability
  • different samples from the same population may
    yield different results for a particular value of
    interest
  • estimates from random samples will be closer to
    the true values in the population if the samples
    are larger
  • how close the estimates will likely be to the
    true values can be calculated -- this is called
    the margin of error
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com