Larry Gamm, PhD and Linnae Hutchison, MBA, MT, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Larry Gamm, PhD and Linnae Hutchison, MBA, MT,

Description:

DIABETES. Sixth leading ... Diabetes registry and management system - Clinical and ... of both hypertension and diabetes increased, as well as the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: L285
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Larry Gamm, PhD and Linnae Hutchison, MBA, MT,


1
Rural Healthy People 2010 A Companion Document
to Healthy People 2010
Presentation to Healthy People Steering
Committee December 10, 2003
  • Larry Gamm, PhD and Linnae Hutchison, MBA, MT,
  • Southwest Rural Health Research Center, School of
    Rural Public Health, Texas AM University System
    Health Science Center
  • http//www.srph.tamushsc.edu/rhp2010

2
Project Funding
  • The Southwest Rural Health Research Center
  • (SRHRC) at the School of Rural Public Health,
  • Texas AM University System Health Science
  • Center gratefully acknowledges grant support
  • for this project from the Federal Office of Rural
  • Health Policy and Health Resources and
  • Services Administration.

3
Presentation Outline
  • Describe the Rural Healthy People 2010 project
    and its components
  • Review some key points and a model for practice
    for each of two rural health priorities
  • Share some emerging themes, current activities
    and plans

4
Rural Healthy People 2010 Purpose
  • Identify and investigate rural health priorities
    related to Healthy People 2010s 28 focus areas
    and 467 objectives
  • Present current rural health research and models
    for addressing rural health priorities
  • Attract more rural people to impressive resources
    offered by Healthy People 2010

5
Project Components
  • Survey responses from over 500 national, state
    and local rural health leaders to
  • Nominate models for practice
  • Establish rural health priorities
  • Literature reviews on 10 broad rural priority
    areas
  • Identify and describe Models for Practice

6
Rural Healthy People 2010 A Companion Document
to Healthy People 2010 2 Vols.
7
Rural Healthy People 2010 Priorities
  • Determining Rural Health Priorities
  • Surveys sent to over 1000 rural health leaders
  • National agency, foundation, research center
    experts
  • State offices of rural health, state primary care
    offices and associations, and state rural health
    associations and
  • Samples of local rural public health agencies,
    rural health clinics and community health
    centers, and rural hospitals.

8
RHP2010 Top Five Priorities
  • Access to Quality Health Services
  • Heart Disease Stroke
  • Diabetes
  • Mental Health Mental Disorders
  • Oral Health

9
Top 16 Rural Health Priorities
Priority rankings based on average percentages
of four groups of state and local rural health
leaders choosing objectives as a priority. There
are virtual ties among some priorities.

10
Literature Review Format
  • Scope of Problem
  • Prevalence and Disparities in Rural Areas
  • Factors Contributing to Condition in Rural Areas
  • Impact of Condition on Morbidity and Mortality
  • Contributor to Other Health Problems
  • Known Causes so that Solutions are Identifiable
  • Solutions that are Feasible in Rural Areas
  • Identified by Rural People as a High Priority
  • Community Models Known to Work


11
Models for Practice Format
  • Blue Print
  • Making a Difference
  • Beginnings
  • Challenges and Solutions

12
General Themes in Rural Health
  • Cannot generalize to all rural areas
  • Glass is both half-full and half empty
  • More serious health problems in rural than in
    many urban areas and, particularly, suburban areas
  • Many rural populations lack access to insurance
    or to professionals to address these problems

13
Rural Health Themes (cont.)
  • Rural communities, disadvantaged and not, are
    addressing many of these problems
  • Many of Models for Practice efforts reflect a
    search for local solutions even as advocacy is
    pitched to state and national policy-makers to
    address rural disparities

14
All health is local key factors
  • life-style, e.g., smoking, diet
  • timely access to screening/treatment
  • educational and social support to control disease
    or stay healthy
  • gaining more education
  • gaining decent jobs and health insurance

15
Priorities Models for Practice
  • Will highlight two rural priority
  • areas treated in the Rural Healthy
  • People 2010 companion document.
  • Will provide capsule accounts
  • of a two of the 55 Models for
  • Practice included in the
  • final document.

16
DIABETES
  • Sixth leading cause of death
  • Sixth and seventh leading cause of
    hospitalization for men and for women,
    respectively, 45 and older
  • Self-reported prevalence is 17 higher in rural
    than central cities and 11 higher than in all
    MSAs

17
DIABETES
  • Diabetes rates
  • Higher in Southwest and Southeast
  • Among obese and those with sedentary lifestyles
  • Among Hispanics and African Americans
  • Increasing rapidly among children

18
DIABETES-PENNSYLVANIA
  • Snapshot Laurel Health System
  • National Diabetes
    Collaborative
  • Problem Addressed Diabetes management
  • Services Provided
  • Diabetes registry and management system
  • - Clinical and self-management
  • - Analysis of patient health status
  • Estimated financial impact of intervention
  • Diabetes education by community partnership

19
DIABETES (cont.)
  • Population Served
  • Six federally qualified health centers of large
    health care system
  • Beginnings
  • Community-needs assessment revealed 45 higher
    incidence of diabetes-related mortality than
    state average

20
DIABETES (cont.)
  • Outcomes
  • 10,000 to 20,000 cost savings for each averted
    stroke, MI, or coronary artery bypass
  • Consistent monitoring of HgA1c levels, annual
    foot exams, immunizations, controlling blood
    pressure, and lipid profile performed
  • Increased primary care revenue
  • Challenges
  • Institutionalization (met)
  • Funding

21
Diabetes/Hypertension-Mississippi
  • Snapshot Delta Community Partners in Care
  • Problem Addressed Diabetes and hypertension
    outreach case management
  • Services Provided
  • Case management
  • Financial Assistance
  • Transportation to provider clinics for assistance
  • Referral and follow-up of social issues that may
    cause barriers in a patients response to care
  • Individualized health education/self care
    planning
  • Organized support services

22
Diabetes/Hypertension (cont.)
  • Population Served
  • 11 county rural area in the Mississippi Delta
    region of northwest Mississippi
  • Under- or uninsured between the ages of 21 and 64
    who have a diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension,
    or both.
  • Beginnings
  • Concerns of the local medical community
  • Greater than expected numbers of patients in ERs,
    or with hypertension, strokes and undiagnosed
    diabetes
  • Coalition of 19 partners

23
Diabetes/Hypertension (cont.)
  • Outcomes
  • Decrease in past year from
  • 1.01 visits to ER to 0.65
  • 0.68 outpatient visits to 0.31
  • 6.37 nights hospitalized to 3.4
  • 26.74 sick days to 15.77
  • Knowledge of both hypertension and diabetes
    increased, as well as the patients ability to
    control their own blood pressure and blood sugar
  • Challenges
  • Continuation of funding

24
ORAL HEALTH
  • Surgeon Generals Report acknowledgement of
    orals health importance to overall health
  • Identified as the 5th highest ranking rural
    health priority with variation by respondent type
  • Contributor to many other health problems
  • Causes access to preventive care limited,
    linkages with tobacco, alcohol consumption, lack
    of flouridation

25
ORAL HEALTH (cont.)
  • Variation in dental disease incidence by age,
    gender, ethnicity, SES, and rurality
  • Hispanic and African American children have
    higher rates of dental caries
  • Rural versus urban
  • Rural children - higher dental caries rates
  • Fewer rural adults have dental visit in the past
    year
  • Edentulism higher in rural areas

26
ORAL HEALTH (continued)
  • Why is oral health worse in rural areas?
  • Differences in access and utilization
  • Economic challenges
  • Dental workforce shortages
  • Proposed Solutions
  • Dental insurance reform
  • Flouridation, sealants
  • Dental professionals supply

27
ORAL HEALTH-MARYLAND
  • Snapshot Choptank Community Health System
  • Services Provided Oral health services at
    schools (using portable equipment)
  • Problems Addressed
  • Screenings, cleanings, education
  • Fluoride applications sealants
  • Referral to community health clinic

28
ORAL HEALTH (cont.)
  • Population Served
  • Low-income elementary school age children in 2
    rural counties
  • Beginnings
  • No dental providers to this population group
  • Local dentist initiated school-based program

29
ORAL HEALTH (cont.)
  • Outcomes
  • Increased percentages of elementary children
    screen and treated for oral health needs
  • Challenges
  • Recruitment of hygienists and allied dental
    providers (met)
  • Parent awareness (met)
  • Funding (met)

30
Recurring themes across priorities
  • Less access to insurance, health professionals,
    regular care in rural settings
  • Disparities across income, education, and ethnic
    groups
  • Medical and social co-morbidities, e.g.,
    depression, obesity, diabetes, oral health,
    tobacco use, substance abuse

31
Themes across Models
  • Some rural providers and community partnerships
    offer Make Do strategies
  • Others are developing health promotion,
    screening, and care management strategies that
    may become affordable options in rural areas
  • Common challenge of funding and stretching local
    resources

32
In Conclusion
  • Rural health disparities are real for much of
    rural America.
  • Access to insurance and health professionals may
    be the levers to major change
  • Prevention and care management models are
    essential in rural areas
  • Providers in models take a community
    problem-solving focus

33
In Conclusion (cont.)
  • Funding challenges promote dual strategy of
    opportunism in external funding and stewardship
    in managing local resources
  • Community-based models and their evaluation
    should be encouraged evaluation activities need
    to become transparent to the conduct of work

34
Whats next?
  • Additional rural priorities and associated models
    for five more HP2010 focus areas - web-based
  • Infectious disease and immunizations
  • Injury and violence prevention
  • Educational Community-Based Programs
  • Public Health Infrastructure
  • Access to Long Term Care and Rehabilitation
    Services

35
  • Contact Information
  • Rural Healthy People 2010
  • Southwest Rural Health Research Center
  • gamm_at_srph.tamu.edu
  • Telephone 979-458-0083
  • http//www.srph.tamushsc.edu/rhp2010/
  • Southwest Rural Health Research Center
  • School of Rural Public Health at the
  • Texas AM University Health Science Center
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com