Title: Calibration and Validation Activities at NOAANESDIS
1Calibration and Validation Activities at
NOAA/NESDIS
- Changyong Cao
- On behalf of James Yoe
- NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications
- CEOS WG on Cal/Val
- June 15-17, 2004, Sioux Falls, SD
2Overview Scope and GoalsExamples of Methods
and Results
- Current operational NOAA instruments AVHRR,
HIRS, AMSU, SBUV, GOES Imagers/Sounders - Assure Functionality of Current/Near-Future
Operational Systems - Develop maintain on-orbit calibration approach,
algorithms, databases - Oversee pre-launch sensor calibration
- Perform post-launch checkout, monitoring, and
trouble-shooting - Apply Experience to Design of Future systems
- Define future measurement requirements support
development of future systems (NPP, NPOESS,
GOES-R, active sensors) - Assure Required Accuracy, Stability,
Inter-comparability - Serve Community of Data Providers and Users
- NOAA, Other US Government Agencies, Academia and
Industry, International partners
3Intersatellite Calibration with Simultaneous
Nadir Overpass (SNO) Observations
- Two satellites pass the same place at their
nadirs within a few seconds (routinely predicted
with SGP4) - Occurs for all satellites with different
altitudes (typically once every few days) In the
polar regions for sun synchronous satellites - SNO time series very useful for intersatellite
calibration of IR/VIS/NIR, and Microwave sensors - Website www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/spb/calibr
ation/intercal/ - Several publications
Cao et al, J. Atmospheric Oceanic Tech, 2004
4Applications of the SNO method
- Used for postlaunch checkout, longterm monitoring
of instrument performance, and re-analysis of
historical data for time-series analysis to
achieve intersatellite calibration consistency - Procedure is implemented for NOAAs AVHRR, HIRS,
and AMSU instruments also used for Terra/Aqua
MODIS/AVHRR by NASA/MCST - Complement to GOES/POES intercal
- Future work for inflight spectral cal with
hyperspectral thermal sensors - Examples (to the right)
- SNO method reveals seasonal biases caused by
spectral response differences for HIRS (upper
right) - SNO method shows excellent agreement between
satellites for AMSU (low right)
HIRS stratosphere channel (longwave infrared 690
cm-1)
AMSU mid-troposphere channel
(Microwave)
5AVHRR Reprocessing Project
- Re-processing of AVHRR data for better product
quality for climate studies - Standardize calibration coefficients and radiance
calculation procedure, such as non-linearity
correction, and band correction coefficients - Use the SNO method to establish the calibration
link among satellites - Provide consistent calibration coefficients with
improved calibration accuracy
AVHRR
?T in
6AVHRR VIS/NIR Vicarious Calibrationusing the
Libyan Desert Target
CH1
CH2
CH3
Courtesy X. Wu
7NIST verification of HIRS filter spectral
response functions (HIRS Ch 1, CO2 Q-branch,
25mb, worst case)
NIST at 30, 25, 20, and 15 C
Vendor
8GOES Star Based Calibration
Courtesy X. Wu, 2004
9(Passive) Microwave Sensors
- Past
- Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU)- NOAA-6 to 14
- Present
- Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-A (AMSU-A)
- Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B)
- Future
- Humidity Microwave Sounder (MHS) NOAA-N
- Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS)
NPP/NPOES - All sensors are well calibrated before launch and
on-orbit data are monitored for calibration
accuracy - Data are used for temperature humidity sounding
and studies of climate trend - AMSU data have significant positive impact on
global weather forecast scores
Courtesy T. Mo
10Status of NESDIS Uniform Instrument Monitoring
System
- User-friendly (web-based) system with high level
info, documentation, meta-data, eng radiometric
data archived undertaken at NRC recommendation - System requirements document completed December
2003 - System specification document in final stage of
preparation - Government team will meet week of 14 June 2004 to
decide which architecture to employ - Funding in place to develop prototype system in
FY04-05.
Courtesy T. Kleespies
11Ocean Color - MOBY Vicarious Calibration
- Vicarious Calibration Required for Ocean Color
Science - Pre-flight Laboratory and On-board Sensor
Calibrations (TOA 4-5) Cannot Meet the Accuracy
Requirements for Ocean Color Science
Applications. - A Minimum of an Order of Magnitude Improvement in
Calibration Accuracy is Required. - MOBY Presently Provides Water-Leaving Radiances
at the 5 (surface) uncertainty Level Which Meets
the Minimum Accuracy Requirement. MOBY has
demonstrated excellent long-term Stability over
the past 6.5 yrs. - MOBY has provided a NIST Traceable Scale for all
of the Major Ocean Color Missions Since the mid
1990s. A necessary requirement for producing
Climate Quality Data Records.
Courtesy D. Clark
12MOBY Instrument and Spectral Time Series of MODIS
ocean color bands (Accuracy 4 -5)
Courtesy D. Clark
13SST Product Validation
- Periodic global GAC AVHRR SST validation has been
conducted continuously since 1983 - SST retrieval precision has gradually improved to
within 0.5 K rms of buoy matchups - GOES SST became operational since Dec. 2000
Courtesy ORA/ORAD/SST Team
14GPS IPW (Integrated Precipitable Water) stations
operated by the NOAA Forecast Systems Lab.
Courtesy NOAA/FSL (S. Gutman)
15GPS measured vs. AIRS derived IPW for the CONUS
(All match-ups within 0.25 deg lat/lon and
within 30min)
(b)
(a)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3.
Red line linear fit for the match-up data.
16COLLOCATED RADIOSONDES
AIRS
NOAA-16
Courtesy Mitch Goldberg
17MODIS and AVHRR NDVIs Compared for a Site in
South Dakota (16 day composites in 2001)
NDVI Calibration/Validation
Effect of AVHRR Spectral Response on longterm
NDVI time series studies
Courtesy X. Wu
Courtesy ORA/SMCD/EMB, K. Gallo
18GOES land surface temperature and US Climate
Reference Network (USCRN) surface temperature
comparison. 1 3 April 2004 EROS Data Center
For further information contact Kevin Gallo
(NOAA/NESDIS, kevin.p.gallo_at_noaa.gov)
19SBUV/2 Ozone Cal/Val Level 2 Ground-based
Comparisons
In press, Miller et al., JGR Atmospheres
20NPP/NPOESS Cal/Val Activities
- VIIRS, CrIS, ATMS, and OMPS will replace AVHRR,
HIRS, AMSU, and SBUV - NPP NPOESS Preparatory Project (IPO/NASA)
- NPOESS Data Exploitation Team (NOAA)
- Oversight of and support to NPOESS cal/val
- Independent verification and monitoring
- Liaison between IPO and NOAA central/civilian
users on cal/val issues - Cal/val support to NOAA unique products
- Ensure continuity from POES to NPOESS
- NPOESS Prelaunch/postlaunch cal/val meetings
- Currently focus on prelaunch tests, instrument
performance issues and potential science impacts
21Summary
- NOAA/NESDIS has extensive calibration/validation
experience in both prelaunch and postlaunch in
atmosphere, sea surface temperature, ocean color,
ozone, and land validation using a variety of
sources, including other satellites, in-situ, and
ground-based remote sensors - SNO method very useful for the cal/val of all
radiometers - Continued support to NOAA operational
instruments, and reprocessing for climate studies - Transition to MetOP and NPOESS
22 23GOES GSIP-fd surface temperature and CRN surface
temperature comparison. 1 3 April 2004 EROS
Data Center
For further information contact Kevin Gallo
(NOAA/NESDIS, kevin.p.gallo_at_noaa.gov)
24Future Plans
- Communicate more comprehensively between WGCV and
NOAA/NESDIS/ORA - SAR and Scatterometry
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Aerosols
- Air quality
- Explore METOP/NPOESS c/v consistency
Office of Research and Applications, soon to
become the Center for SaTellite Applications and
Research, (STAR)
25Near Future Validation of AQUA/AIRSTemp.
Differences (AIRS - RS80 Radiosonde)
26Near Future Operational AQUA/AIRS IPWV Validation
27Future Operational GPS/RO Vertical Coverage
Verification
CHAMP Data courtesy NASA/JPL Alternate Sources
UCAR/CDAAC and GFZ Potsdam Statistics prepared
by Rama Varma Raja, IMSG for NOAA
28Future Sensors Preliminary CHAMP Moisture Check
- Prepared by Rama Varma Raja
29Future Satellite Sensors -Doppler Wind Lidar
- Highest Unmet Data Requirement for NWP
- Technologically Challenging
- Demonstration Space Instrument (ESAs ADM)
expected in 2007 - Ground-based Instruments for technology
development, assessment (left)
30Histograms of the differences between
corresponding pairs of (left) 1-minute
line-of-sight projected horizontal (LOSH) Doppler
velocities for the GroundWinds and mini-MOPA
DWLs, and (b) GroundWinds (10-min averaged) LOSH
and the component of the height-averaged
radiosonde horizontal wind along the DWL azimuth
31An Eye to the Future
- Communicate more comprehensively between WGCV and
NOAA/NESDIS/ORA - SAR and Scatterometry
- OC
- Microwave sounders
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Aerosols
- Land and Surface Products
- Explore METOP/NPOESS c/v consistency