Market Structure In the Healthcare Industry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Market Structure In the Healthcare Industry

Description:

Oligopoly. The market for organs. Characteristics of Perfect ... Oligopoly ... Like monopoly, oligopoly will lead to lower output and higher prices than would ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1000
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: ASCC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Market Structure In the Healthcare Industry


1
Market Structure In the Healthcare Industry
  • Professor Vivian Ho
  • Health Economics
  • Fall 2009

These notes draw from material in Santerre
Neun, Health Economics, Theories, Insights and
Industry Studies. Southwestern Cengate 2010
2
Outline
  • Defining perfect competition
  • The market structure continuum
  • Monopoly
  • Monopolistic competition
  • Oligopoly
  • The market for organs

3
Characteristics of Perfect Competition
  • Consumers pay the full price of the product
  • Consumers will respond to differences in prices
    among sellers
  • All firms maximize profits
  • Firms have incentives to satisfy consumer wants
    and produce efficiently

4
Characteristics of Perfect Competition (cont.)
  • There is a large number of buyers and sellers,
    each of which is small relative to the total
    market
  • No one buyer or seller is powerful enough to
    influence or manipulate the market price of a
    product
  • All firms in the same industry produce a
    homogeneous product
  • A consumer can easily find substitutes for the
    product of any given firm

5
Characteristics of Perfect Competition (cont.)
  • No barriers to entry or exit exist
  • New firms can enter the industry
  • All economic agents possess perfect information
  • Consumers and firms can make informed choices
  • All firms face nondecreasing average costs of
    production
  • Rules out a natural monopoly

6
Monopoly Model
  • In contrast to perfect competition, a monopoly
    market has the following features
  • One seller
  • Homogeneous or differentiated product
  • Complete barriers to entry
  • Because there is only one firm, that firm faces
    the market demand curve, which is downward sloping

7
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • What is the profit-maximizing price and quantity
    for a monopolist?
  • Recall that all firms will maximize profits where
    MRMC
  • We have already seen that the marginal cost curve
    for a firm depends on its production function and
    input prices
  • What does the firms MR curve look like?

8
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • MR P Q (?P/?Q)
  • Because the second term in this formula
    represents a revenue loss, it is always negative
  • Thus, at each level of output, marginal revenue
    is always lower than price
  • The marginal revenue curve lies under the demand
    curve

9
Monopoly Model (cont.)
Dollars per unit
Demand
MR
Quantity
10
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • We are now ready to find the profit-maximizing
    output for a monopolist
  • The monopolist sets output at a level where MRMC
  • On a graph, find the level of Q where the MR and
    MC curves intersect
  • To determine the price the monopolist will
    charge, locate the price on the demand curve at
    this same output level

11
Monopoly Model (cont.)
Dollars per unit
MC
P
Demand
MR
Q
Quantity
12
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • The monopolists level of profits can then be
    determined by adding its average total cost curve
    to the graph
  • Profits will be the difference between P and
    ATC, multiplied by Q

13
Monopoly Model (cont.)
Dollars per unit
MC
P
ATC
Profits
ATC
Demand
MR
Q
Quantity
14
Contrast to Perfect Competition
Dollars per unit
Under perfect competition, the market equilibrium
would instead be where PMC
MC
ATC
PC
Demand
MR
QC
Quantity
The higher price and lower output in a
monopolized market is why economists claim that
competition is better for social welfare
15
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • A monopoly only maintains its status if there are
    no substitutes for the product it sells
  • There must be barriers to entry, so that other
    firms cannot enter the market to compete
  • The two most common barriers to entry
  • Economies of scale
  • Legal restrictions

16
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • Economies of scale
  • If a monopoly is producing output at a level
    where long run average costs are declining, then
    new firms cannot compete on a cost basis
  • A monopoly hospital in a small town may have
    substantial economies of scale if it can meet
    demand with only 40-50 beds
  • Unless a new hospital could take away a
    substantial share of the existing hospitals
    patients, it could not match the existing
    hospital in costs (and therefore profits as well)

17
Monopoly Model (cont.)
  • Legal restrictions
  • Physicians require a license to practice medicine
  • Many states require that providers obtain a
    Certificate of Need to offer a new service
  • Drug companies obtain patents for new
    pharmaceutical products

18
The Market Structure Continuum
  • We have talked about 2 extremes of the market
    structure continuum
  • Perfect Competition
  • Pure Monopoly
  • Along this continuum, there are 2 more levels of
    competitiveness that we will encounter in the
    health care sector

19
The Market Structure Continuum
Perfect Competition
Oligopoly
Monopoly
Monopolistic Competition
20
Monopolistic Competition
  • Many sellers
  • Differentiated product
  • No barriers to entry
  • Examples
  • Breakfast cereals
  • Ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin, etc.)
  • Cigarettes

21
Monopolistic Competition (cont.)
  • Because products are differentiated across firms,
    each seller has some ability to control price
  • Each seller faces a slightly downward sloping
    demand curve
  • Sellers have an incentive to differentiate
    their product from competitors
  • Doing so is likely to raise demand for their
    product

22
Monopolistic Competition (cont.)
Dollars per Unit
Demand under monopolistic competition
Demand under perfect competition
Output
2 potential demand curves for an individual firm
23
Monopolistic Competition (cont.)
  • How do sellers differentiate their product?
  • Advertising
  • Is advertising bad for consumers?
  • Creates imaginary or artificial wants
  • Persuasive, not informative
  • Business stealing, w/ no benefits to consumer
  • Habit buying is a barrier to entry

24
Monopolistic Competition (cont.)
  • Benefits of advertising
  • May convey important info on value of a good or
    service
  • People benefit from real diversity choice
  • Cheap info to customers to distinguish b/w
    products
  • May promote quality competition
  • Firms willing to invest in creating a brand name
    reputation will work to keep it
  • May inform the consumer of good or service they
    werent aware of
  • Shift the D curve out

25
DTC Drug Advertising
  • August 1997, FDA permitted brand-specific
    direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising w/o brief
    summary of drug effectiveness, side effects, and
    contraindications
  • DTC advertising rose from 800m in 1996 to 2.5b
    in 2000
  • What were the consequences?
  • (Iizuka Jin, 2003)

26
DTC Drug Advertising
  • Iizuka Jin track monthly expenditures on DTC
    advertising for 1994-2000
  • They also track monthly visits to the doctor in a
    recurring national survey for 1994-2000
  • Survey indicates whether a drug was prescribed
    during the visit, and for what class

27
DTC Drug Advertising
  • Classes of drugs w/ heavy advertising had large ?
    in prescribing

28
DTC Drug Advertising
  • Classes of drugs w/ less advertising had no ?in
    prescriptions

29
DTC Drug Advertising
  • IV column After deregulation, each 1 ? in DTC
    Ads raises of visits w/ a prescription by .0464

30
DTC Drug Advertising
  • IV column After deregulation, each 1 ? in DTC
    Ads raises of visits w/ a prescription by .0464
  • How much ad spending is needed to get one extra
    prescription?
  • 1/.046421.55
  • Does DTC advertising look profitable to drug
    companies?

31
Oligopoly
  • Few, dominant sellers
  • Homogeneous or differentiated product
  • Substantial barriers to entry
  • Examples
  • Tertiary services at teaching hospitals
  • Many prescription drugs

32
Oligopoly
  • Because there are only a few dominant sellers,
    actions of any one firm can change the overall
    market price
  • Like monopoly, oligopoly will lead to lower
    output and higher prices than would be observed
    under perfect competition
  • Regulators are concerned about consumer welfare
    in oligopolistic markets

33
Markets for Organs
  • Should we allow markets for organs for transplant
    surgery?
  • Payment to donors of organs is currently
    forbidden in developed countries.
  • Yet there is persistent excess demand for organ
    transplants (Becker and Elias, JEP 2007)

34
Markets for Organs
35
Markets for Organs
36
Markets for Organs
  • Estimate excess demand from the growth in the
    waiting list in any year, plus deaths for those
    on waiting list.
  • Excess demand in kidney market grew from 2,500
    persons in 1991 to 7,000 in 2000.

37
The Price of an Organ
  • How much pay is required to induce an individual
    to sell an organ?
  • Compensate individual for
  • Risk of death
  • Time lost during recovery
  • Risk of reduced quality of life

38
Pricing Risk of Death
  • risk of death x Value of a statistical life
  • Estimated range 1.5 - 10 m for someone with a
    35,000 average annual income in 2005.
  • Risk of death .1
  • e.g. 5 m x .1 5,000

39
Time Lost During Recovery
  • Assume donor earns 35,000 / year
  • Loses 4 weeks of work while in recovery
  • 35,000 x 4 weeks gt 2,700

40
Risk of Quality of Life
  • No comprehensive data on how kidney donation
    affects QOL.
  • Some studies suggest kidney donors can live
    normal lives, unless high physical contact (e.g.
    athletes).
  • But other studies find kidney donors at high risk
    of high blood pressure.
  • Could arbitrarily assume 7,500.

41
Market for Organs
  • Cost of Performing Kidney transplant surgery
    160K
  • Risk of Death 5,000
  • Time Lost in Recovery 2,700
  • Risk of QOL 7,500
  • 15,200
  • Live donors raise total price 15,200 / 160,000
    9.5,
  • but supply is perfectly elastic.

42
Markets for Organs
  • 13,500 kidney transplants in 2005,
  • 8000 on waiting list
  • gt excess demand 21,500
  • Assume eD for organ transplants -1
  • price 9.5 gt demand 9.5
  • 9.5 x 21,500 2,043
  • Demand 21,500 2043 19,457, but all would be
    supplied.
  • Equilibrium transplants rise from 13,500 to
    19,457 44

43
Excess Demand if Sales are Banned
Excess Demand
D
Q0 Transplants
44
Market for Organs
S

e
S
175,200
160,000
D
Q0 Q1 Transplants
45
Markets for Organs
  • Under a range of assumptions, allowing the sale
    of live donor organs substantially raises the
    of transplants.
  • See Table 3, Becker.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com