Title: Industrial Organization PGDMM501
1Industrial Organization PGDMM501
- Lecture 11 Market Clearing
2Introduction
- So far we assumed that prices adjust in order
that markets clear. i.e. at the prevailing price
QsQd - Conventional micro models that assumed the above
- Alternative theories that questions the above and
suggest ways other than prices which helps market
clearing (discussed mainly within macro tradition)
3A concise family tree
Classical Economics Supply creates its own
demand. (Smith, Ricardo etc.) A general glut was
impossible. "substance" theories of value
Neo-classical 1870s Marginalist Revolution of
Jevons, Menger and Walras. Value comprise of
costs of production and subjective elements,
called "supply" and "demand."
Keynes (1936) The great depression
Micro
Macro
4(No Transcript)
5Theories of how markets clear
- Competition
- Prices adjust so as to clear the markets
- Price changes are perfectly correlated across
various buyers - No transactions cost (see p.3)
- Oligopoly
- Price may be sticky in response to small cost
changes - http//www.tutor2u.net/economics/content/topics/mo
nopoly/kinked_demand.htm - Monopoly
- Draw examples in p.545
6Oligopoly price increase vs. price decline
7Oligopoly Kinked demand
8Oligopoly Price stickiness
9Theories of how markets clear
- Competition
- Oligopoly
- Monopoly
- In all of the above three models generally
- Transactions cost is zero
- Price changes among buyers are correlated
- No unsatisfied demanders or suppliers at existing
price - Price adjustment depend on shape of S and D curves
10Role of price Empirical Evidence
- Price Rigidity
- Queues at petrol station (Excess demand)
- Empty shelves at Cargills
- How do we explain the unsatisfied demanders?
11Mills (1972)
There could be twoexplanations of the U
shaped frequency dist. 1. That there are
markets in which prices to not adjust much (price
rigidity) 2. There are markets that under go a
fewer number of shocks to demand and/or supply
12Other studies
- Means (1935) attempt to explain great depression
using the concept of administered prices - Stigler an Kindahl (1970) Uses a different data
set revealing more flexible prices. Also - long term buyer seller relations
- During booms spot prices go above long term
contract prices - Contracts specify neither a price nor a quantity
13Other studies
- Carlton (1986) reexamine Stigler-Kindahl data.
- Price rigidity differs across industries
- Price movements across buyers in some markets not
highly correlated - High correlation between industry concentration
and price rigidity (no such relation in simple
models!!)
14Explaining the evidence
- How to explain
- Rigidity-concentration relations
- Poor correlation between price changes of
different buyers. i.e. Buyer X gets a lower price
when Buyer Y gets a higher price - Two approaches
- Extend the simple theories
- Find alternative theories
15Extension 1 Include Time
- This enables inter-temporal substitution in both
demand and supply - The effect of this on the competitive model
- Shocks to D and S can be absorbed by something
other than prices today
16Today Tomorrow
Increase in demand today can should increase the
price. But alternatively it could force the
consumers to consume tomorrow. Confirmed by large
fluctuations in delivery dates and small
fluctuations in prices.
17Dynamic theory
- For oligopoly theory the time factor has a
similar impact - MonopolyMay want to absorb temporary cost
increases leading to price rigidity
18Extension 2 Menu Cost
- fixed costs of changing prices
- Apart from the menu costs a price change can
trigger a consumer search session which might
lead to loss of business - Change prices only if cost thereof is less than
the benefits
19Extension 3 Inventories
- Monopolies set prices and output before observing
the demand - Do this by equating expected price to marginal
cost - Expected price Price ? Probability of
purchase - Inventory policy f (price cost margin)
- This is because of the trade off between cost of
holding inventory and profit from sales - P(stock out) increase with falling mark up
- Fluctuating demand requires high inventories
therefore S f (D)
20Inventories
q
q
T
T
- S f (D)
- Explains poor correlation between price changes
of different buyers.
21Extension 3 Adverse Selection and moral Hazard
- The lemons problem can lead to higher prices and
excess demand. This is useful because the buyer
has no idea of the quality of the car. - Similarly excess supply could also result from
asy.
22Explaining the evidence
- How to explain
- Rigidity-concentration relations
- Poor correlation between price changes of
different buyers. i.e. Buyer X gets a lower price
when Buyer Y gets a higher price - Two approaches
- Extend the simple theories
- Find alternative theories
23General theory of allocation
- Even financial markets are costly to set up (this
is why you pay fees for the use of such markets) - That is when you want to have prices clear the
market - What helps the establishment of price clearing
markets?
24Price rigidity not inefficient if
- When other methods of clearing markets are in use
(salespeople) prices do not move to even if
markets are cleared - Sellers knowledge (due to long term associations)
of buyers