ZeroPoint Energy in Spheroidal Geometries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

ZeroPoint Energy in Spheroidal Geometries

Description:

Oblate spheroid (with b = 0.1) For fixed b and increasing a the ZPE again decreases. For large oblate ellipticity the ZPE is negative. a ... oblate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:212
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: IT136
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ZeroPoint Energy in Spheroidal Geometries


1
Zero-Point Energy in Spheroidal Geometries
  • Adrian Kitson
  • Institute of Fundamental Sciences
  • Massey University
  • New Zealand

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Spheroidal geometry
  • Scalar field
  • Vector field
  • QCD flux tubes

3
Motivation
  • Lattice QCD simulations

4
Spheroidal geometry
  • Cartesian equation
  • Prolate
  • Oblate
  • Ellipticity
  • Prolate
  • Oblate

z
b
y
a
x
5
Spheroidal geometry
  • Prolate spheroidal coordinates
  • where

z
b
y
a
x
6
Scalar field
  • Consider a massless scalar field satisfying
    Dirichlet boundary conditions on the surface of a
    prolate spheroid
  • Assuming harmonic time dependence, , the
    field equation becomes Helmholtzs equation
  • This can be solved by separation of variables in
    prolate spheroidal coordinates

7
Radial function
  • The radial function satisfies the following
    differential equation
  • In the spherical limit this reduces
    to
  • which is the spherical Bessel differential
    equation with

8
Radial function
  • For general c
  • where
  • The coefficients satisfy a
    three-term recursion relation
  • The radial functions are normalized to have the
    same asymptotic behaviour as the spherical Bessel
    functions

9
Dirichlet boundary condition
  • The Dirichlet boundary condition becomes
  • In terms of dimensionless variables
  • where e is the prolate ellipticity
  • The eigen-energy modes are

10
Zeta-function approach
  • The ZPE is defined as
  • (though from now on let )
  • Spectral zeta function
  • The zeta-function approach defines the ZPE as

11
Zeta-function approach
  • In terms of dimensionless variables
  • This can be written as a contour integral
  • This can be analytically continued to give
  • which is valid for

12
Zeta-function approach
  • For small ellipticity
  • The first term is simply the zeta function for a
    spherical boundary

13
Zeta-function approach
  • Rescaling , and writing in terms of
    Ricatti-Bessel functions
  • where and the Ricatti-Bessel
    functions are

14
Bessel functions
  • Uniform asymptotic expansion
  • where and

15
Zeta-function approach
  • Rescaling , and writing in terms of
    Ricatti-Bessel functions
  • where and the Ricatti-Bessel
    functions are

16
Zeta-function approach
  • The coefficient of
  • Using the uniform asymptotic expansion for the
    Bessel functions the integrand is expanded to

17
Zeta-function approach
  • Laurent expansion of the zeta function about
  • The contribution to the ZPE from the coefficient
    of
  • Including exterior modes gives

18
Greens function approach
  • The Greens function for the scalar field
    satisfies
  • If all space is considered, the zero-point energy
    is given by
  • Working to , the contribution to the
    ZPE from the coefficient of

19
Zero-point energy
  • The zero-point energy of a massless scalar field
    subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions on a
    prolate spheroidal shell
  • The spherical part is taken from Romeos work on
    the zeta-function approach in spherical
    geometries 1
  • 1 A. Romeo, Bessel ?-function approach to the
    Casimir effect of a scalar field in a spherical
    bag, Phys Rev D52 7308 (1995)

20
Results
  • Prolate spheroid (with a 0.1)
  • For fixed a, the ZPE of a scalar field subject
    to prolate spheroidal boundary conditions
    decreases as b increases
  • Oblate spheroid (with b 0.1)
  • For fixed b and increasing a the ZPE again
    decreases
  • For large oblate ellipticity the ZPE is negative

a
b
21
Results
  • ZPE of a scalar field subject to Dirichlet
    boundary conditions on the surface of a spheroid

prolate
b
a
oblate
22
Vector field
  • The vector Helmholtzs equation cannot be solved
    by separation of variables in prolate spheroidal
    coordinates
  • If axial symmetry is assumed, then the vector
    field can be separated into transverse electric
    (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) modes
  • The boundary conditions are

23
Results
  • ZPE of an axially symmetric electromagnetic field
    inside a perfectly conducting prolate spheroidal
    cavity

a 0.1
b
24
QCD flux tubes
  • Oxman et al. found for an infrared modified gluon
    bag model the ZPE of a spherical bag is
    attractive 2
  • For an infrared modified propagator the
    zero-point energy is
  • Assuming the above relation, and accounting for
    the 8 gluons, the QCD ZPE for a prolate
    spheroidal cavity is
  • 2 L. E. Oxman, N. F. Svaiter R. L. P.G.
    Amaral, Attractive Casimir effect in an infrared
    modified gluon bag model, hep-th/0507195 (2005)

25
Results
  • ZPE of QCD flux tube?

a 0.1
26
Summary
  • The zero-point energy of scalar fields in
    spheroidal geometries can be calculated for small
    ellipticity
  • Vector fields in spheroidal geometries are more
    of a challenge
  • Assuming the infrared modified result, the ZPE of
    a QCD flux tube gives rise to an attractive
    inter-quark force

27
Acknowledgments
  • Prof. Tony Signal
  • Massey University
  • Institute of Fundamental Sciences and the Royal
    Society of New Zealand
  • QFEXT05 Organizing committee
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com