Title: FDA Marketing Regulations
1FDA Marketing Regulations
2FDA Summary of PDMA (Source 1), 1987
- Amends the FDCA of 1938
- Permits only U.S. manufacturers to reimport their
drugs, except for emergencies
- Prohibits selling, purchasing, or trading
prescription drug samples or coupons
- Prohibits selling etc. of prescription drugs that
were donated or supplied at a reduced price to a
charitable organization
- Permits the distribution of samples only to
practitioners licensed to prescribe such drugs
3FDA Summary of PDMA, 1987
- Requires distribution of drug samples only upon
written request by physicians with proper
documentation
- Requires unauthorized distributors to inform
wholesale customers of all previous sales of the
product before it is sold to them
- Drug company must maintain for the public a list
of all authorized distributors of record
- Directs Sec. of HHS to issue guidelines for
licensing persons to make wholesale distributions
of interstate commerce of prescription drugs
4FDA Summary of PDMA, 1987
- Obviously, the PDMA is designed to curb marketing
abuses
- Where considerations other than medical affect
doctors decisions as to what drugs to prescribe
- During the 1980s free samples were sometimes
sold by recipient doctors or hospitals
- Also of concern were counterfeit drugs
- Authenticity of drugs could be established
through licensing of wholesale distributors and
- documentation (paper trails) from manufacturer to
retailer
5FDA Report to Congress, 2001
- In spite of the PDMA, there were significant
concerns about how drugs were marketed
- A major report to Congress took place in 2001
(Source 2)
- Increasingly the focus is upon verifying the
authenticity (or pedigree) of drugs
- Since 1988 a wholesale drug diversion submarket
had developed
6FDA Report to Congress, 2001
- The PDMA requires States to license wholesale
distributors of prescription drugs
- Unauthorized wholesale distributors must provide
a paper trail to purchasers
- Prohibits sales of prescription drugs that have
been purchased by a hospital or other health care
entity,
- or that have been donated or supplied at a
reduced price to the charitable organization
7FDA Report to Congress, 2001
- The PDMA was passed in 1987 and yet but there are
still debates about the rules to implement the Act
8Government Enforcement Efforts Against Drug
Companies (3)
- Fraud by pharma companies is combated by the
Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Dept. of
HHS
- Among the important issues are
- Compliance the 1997 Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act (FDAMA)
- Whether pharma companies are completing their
post study requirements in a timely manner
- Direct to consumer advertising
- FDA oversight of off-label drug uses
- Compliance with mandatory reporting requirements
for adverse events involving medical devices
- Huge fines for violations of various drug
distribution laws continue to be issued
9Government Enforcement Efforts Against Drug
Companies
- There are three main statutes that have been used
against pharma companies for illegal marketing
- Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute
- Civil False Claims Act
- Prescription Drug Market Act (PDMA) of 1987
10The Anti-Kickback Statute
- Prohibits intentionally offering remuneration to
induce business payable to a federal healthcare
program
- In addition to fines and other penalties, the
def. could be barred from Medicare and Medicaid
programs
- The intent element has been watered down by the
courtsknowledge is sufficient
- Among the factors the courts look at in deciding
whether the intent element has been satisfied
is
- Does the arrangement have the potential to
interfere with clinical decision-making?
11The Anti-Kickback Statute
- Factors used to determine if the def. engaged in
knowing and willful conduct
- Does the practice have the potential to increase
costs to federal healthcare programs,
beneficiaries, or enrollees
- Does the practice have the potential to increase
the risk of over or under use
- Note that the OIG has elucidated a large (22)
number of safe harbors
12The Anti-Kickback Statute
- Needless to say the rules regarding kickbacks are
quite complicated
- Compliance with a safe harbor is not necessary
13False Claims Act (FCA)
- FCA makes a person liable for a civil sanction
if
- The def. knowingly makes, uses etc. a false
record to secure a payment on the false claim
- Or conspires to defraud the govt.
- The knowledge requirement of the FCA is even
broader than of the Anti-Kickback Statute
- The FCA has bounty hunter and whistleblower
provisions
- Bounty hunters are entitled to 15 to 30 of the
recovery
- For egregious cases damages can be tripled
14Prescription Drug Marketing Act
- Passed to address marketing practices that
- Resulted in diversion of drugs into a grey
market
- Among the questionable marketing practices are
- Distribution of free samples, the use of coupons
redeemable at no or low cost
- Sales of deeply discounted drugs to hospitals or
other healthcare facilities
- Prevention of mislabeled, adulterated, or
counterfeit drugs
- Sales of drug samples is punishable at up to 10
years in jail
15Prescription Drug Marketing Act
- This act prohibits resale of any drug that was
previously purchased by a healthcare entity
- Most of these drugs were purchased at deeply
discounted prices
- Drug wholesalers are required, prior to
distributing any prescription drug,
- To provide the purchaser with a statement of
origin identifying all prior sales of the drug
- These provisions do not apply to drug
manufacturers and authorized distributors
- This provision is supposed to foster a paper
trail
- The FDA has not instituted the paper trail, or
pedigree, requirements because of protests from
secondary wholesalers. Some states have gone
ahead anyway with pedigree requirements
16Prescription Drug Marketing Act
- Other provisions of the PDMA include
- Purchase or sale of prescription drug coupons
redeemable for free or low-cost prescription
drugs
- Wholesale distribution of prescription drugs
interstate without a state license
- Reimportation of prescription drugs by anyone
other than the manufacturer
17Govt. Enforcement Actions against Drug Companies
- A number of pharma companies have been the target
of govt. actions
- TAP sells a prostate cancer drug called Lupron
- TAP had to pay the govt. 875 million
- TAP allegedly inflated the price the govt. would
reimburse it for Lupron through Medicare
- and also for allegedly violating the
Anti-Kickback statute and the Fraud Claims Act
(FCA)
- TAP offered to sell Lupron to physicians much
lower than physicians were being compensated for
the drug by Medicare
- TAP was able to escape being excluded from
Medicare and Medicaid programs by signing a
Corporate Integrity Agreement
18Govt. Enforcement Actions against Drug Companies
- Pfizer/Warner-Lambert
- The anti-epilepsy drug Neurontin was the subject
of a govt. settlement
- PWL was accused of promoting off-label use of the
drug
- PWL had to pay 430 million in the settlement
- Again, in lieu of being excluded from Medicare
etc. PWL agreed to a Corporate Integrity
Agreement for 5 yrs.
19Govt. Enforcement Actions against Drug Companies
- Schering-Plough sells the anti-allergy drug,
Claritin
- SP was required to report its best prices to the
fed. govt. and to pay rebates to Medicaid
- Due to competition from Allegra with various
large managed care customers, SP lowered its
prices but did not pay the rebates to Medicaid
- The settlement required SP to pay more than 345
million in criminal and civil fines
20Govt. Enforcement Actions against Drug Companies
- GlaxoSmithKline sells Paxil which is an
anti-depressant
- GSK allegedly failed to disclose information
related to safety and effectiveness
- Again it was alleged that Paxil was being
promoted for off-label uses
- When information about Paxil was requested, GSK
only included favorable information.
- Part of the settlement included a requirement to
release the results of all clinical trials
21Increased Govt. Scrutiny
- Pharmaceutical companies are big targets for
politicians and prosecutors
- The authors recommend
- Written compliance programs
- All personnel must receive vigorous regulatory
compliance training
- Companies should have internal crisis
communication strategy
22Compliance Plan
- The culpability of pharma companies may depend on
the extent to which they implement a Compliance
Plan
- An effective Compliance and Ethics Program
requires
- Due diligence to prevent and deter criminal
conduct
- Promote an organizational culture that encourages
ethical conduct
- The program must be reasonably designed to detect
criminal conduct
23Compliance Plan
- Compliance programs have become increasingly
specific in involving management in
responsibility for criminal actions of
subordinates - Among the characteristics of compliance plans
are
- Standards and procedures that reasonably capable
of reducing the likelihood of violations of law
- Upper level management should be involved
- Substantial Authority Personnel should not
include those who failed a due diligence test in
the past (something bad occurred under their
watch) - On-going training and dissemination of standards
and procedures
24Compliance Plan
- Compliance Plan
- Enhanced obligations for monitoring and auditing
to ensure the compliance plan is being followed
- Internal auditing reporting systems and
- Providing for anonymity or confidentiality
- Consistent Promotion and Enforcement of
Compliance Program
- Really involves an obligation of employees to
report suspected violations of other employees
- If criminal behavior is detected the business
must do what is necessary to prevent a
reoccurrence
25Compliance Plan
- A focus should be on sales and marketing staff
- Risk areas include
- Discounts to purchasers, rebates and coupons,
product support services, educational and
research grants, relationships with physicians,
gifts to those who refer or purchase, formulary
relationships, switching arrangements, consulting
payments, compensation of sales representatives,
price calculations, and drug samples
26Crisis Management Plan
- When the govt. launches an investigation, the
company should be prepared
- Employees who are contacted by govt.
investigators should be told that they have to a
legal counsel and informed generally of their
legal rights - A well crafted crisis management plan can reduce
the adverse impact of govt. investigation